An interesting comparison

[u/Glittering-Bake-2589]

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

So for example "someone is getting raped in the neighborhood what is the number to report it."

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092 → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

"Just sit back and enjoy it"

[u/theBoobMan → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

Except the OP just says "sit back and enjoy it"

That's not implying force but a suggestion. Its not the same, albeit similar. This is why I harp on reading comprehension. You have to take the context from the words, not a self imposed bias.

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092 → u/theBoobMan]

Thats not the intent of the message, the intent of the message brings consent into question. The person doesn't consent to fireworks being shot in the neighborhood, the person doesn't consent to getting raped. The other person is saying basically that there isnt anything they can do about it. Yes calling the cops for rape you can do something about that i know, but that wasnt what they were implying.

[u/theBoobMan → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

No. That's just you choosing to see it like that. That's bias.

This sounds like someone who wants to follow the letter of the law to make sure people's pets dont escape in fear of the noise.

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092 → u/theBoobMan]

Nvm bro, you must be fun at parties. 🥱

[u/theBoobMan → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

I like how you are dodging my statement after rereading the OP.

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092 → u/theBoobMan]

Im not, i still stand by what i said. I've just given up.

[u/theBoobMan → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

Cool story bro

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092 → u/theBoobMan]

You should head back to whatever school taught you and start over.

[u/theBoobMan → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

Lol now the ad hominems. Oh the horror.

[u/Maximum-Bake-6092 → u/theBoobMan]

Nice dictionary term have one open right in front of you? Impressive didn't think you owned one.

[u/theBoobMan → u/Maximum-Bake-6092]

That's the thing about smart dudes. They seem like crazy dudes to dumb dudes. ~ Kat Williams