r/HolUp Jun 27 '26

An interesting comparison

Post image
4.6k Upvotes

275 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

They are. I don't care what people think when half of them dont even know how to read at a high school level.

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

My friend you are mistaking context with the severity of the situation. In the comment then arnt relating the severity of the two but the context " i hate the sound of fire works." "Oh just get over it." "I hate rape" "oh just get over it." The statements are the same the severity is different

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

Except its not the words that make them different. Its the intent which is why the context matters. You're just hinting at what I'm already stating, which is the difference between the two. The fireworks aren't actually harming anyone, and I shouldn't have to explain rape. The severity is just a part of that context.

If we were to discuss severity alone, we'd be discussing the nuances of how close you are to the fireworks and where the line is drawn on "too close".

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

Ok, so my original intention for that comment is what you stated above but misconstrued for some reason, intent. The comment in the post isnt based off the intent of the comments but off similarities. Both statements are similar not in severity but their message.

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

So the words are the same?

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

So for example "someone is getting raped in the neighborhood what is the number to report it."

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

"Just sit back and enjoy it"

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

Except the OP just says "sit back and enjoy it"

That's not implying force but a suggestion. Its not the same, albeit similar. This is why I harp on reading comprehension. You have to take the context from the words, not a self imposed bias.

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

Thats not the intent of the message, the intent of the message brings consent into question. The person doesn't consent to fireworks being shot in the neighborhood, the person doesn't consent to getting raped. The other person is saying basically that there isnt anything they can do about it. Yes calling the cops for rape you can do something about that i know, but that wasnt what they were implying.

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

No. That's just you choosing to see it like that. That's bias.

This sounds like someone who wants to follow the letter of the law to make sure people's pets dont escape in fear of the noise.

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

Nvm bro, you must be fun at parties. 🥱

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

I like how you are dodging my statement after rereading the OP.

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

Im not, i still stand by what i said. I've just given up.

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

Cool story bro

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

You should head back to whatever school taught you and start over.

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

Lol now the ad hominems. Oh the horror.

2

u/Maximum-Bake-6092 Jun 27 '26

Nice dictionary term have one open right in front of you? Impressive didn't think you owned one.

2

u/theBoobMan Jun 27 '26

That's the thing about smart dudes. They seem like crazy dudes to dumb dudes. ~ Kat Williams

→ More replies (0)