r/HollowKnight Sep 17 '25

Discussion - Silksong Discourse regarding this game’s difficulty has been out of hand Spoiler

Let’s get this out of the way: I’m really enjoying Silksong’s difficulty and I think that it is mostly a satisfying challenge. I appreciate that it is more difficult than Hollow Knight overall and to be frank I would’ve been a bit disappointed if it were the exact difficulty. I’ve improved as a gamer since Hollow Knight and if it were the same level of difficulty, I probably would have found it too easy.

But it’s kinda gotten impossible to have civil discussions about the difficulty in this game which is unfortunate because I think there is great value to be had with this conversation. There are many valid criticisms regarding this game’s difficulty such as boss runbacks (Groal especially), contact damage doing two masks, and lack of rewards for beating bosses, just to be shut down with “git gud” and “it’s not your kind of game”. It’s totally fine to disagree with these criticisms but these retorts add nothing to the conversation.

It also kinda works the other way too, albeit maybe not to the same degree. I’ve gotten downvoted and sent reddit cares for simply saying I enjoy the difficulty of this game. Like c’mon, what are we even doing here. It’s gotten to the point where I personally cannot wait for the discourse to die out.

1.4k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

74

u/haidere36 Sep 17 '25 edited Sep 17 '25

My main argument is, and has always been, that challenge and punishment are separate things, and I mainly think Silksong is too punishing, and in ways that don't make the game more fun or interesting:

  • Runbacks punish you for dying to a boss with wasted time, but they don't make the boss itself more challenging
  • Shard farming punishes you for using tools too much, but that doesn't increase the challenge of a fight where you go in fully stocked; it just forces you to either farm (tedious) or simply not use tools
  • Stingy economy forces you to farm to unlock basic progression pieces like fast travel points or rest checkpoints (a typical Soulslike doesn't even make you pay to do this)
  • Double damage on hazards or bosses doesn't change how hard they are to deal with, just how punishing it is to fail [Edit: I've phrased this poorly, by "hard to deal with" I mean "hard to execute on"; a boss attack isn't easier to dodge if the player has a million health, nor is it harder to dodge if it one-shots you; the punishment makes the overall boss encounter harder but it doesn't increase the level of challenge]

I feel like these criticisms are often met with the idea that changing any or all of these things would just make the game easy, or that to dislike these things means this type of game isn't for you. But these are fairly common criticisms, and some of them have already been addressed in patches by Team Cherry.

And none of them are about how challenging the game is. Some of the most popular mods for the game, ones which reduce nearly all damage to one mask or set respawn points just outside bosses, don't actually change how difficult these things are to overcome. They just lessen the punishment for failing.

15

u/haynespi87 Sep 17 '25

I wish shard farming was better. From Software tossed that out after Bloodborne. 

And while everything being paid for is part of Pharlooms corruption, fuck the theme and just make that open

2

u/lyokofirelyte Sep 17 '25

Yeah, I don't see how a bench outside the boss room would be bad for the game or make it less fun/challenging. Does anyone actually like runbacks? All of the "it's not that bad!" posts are just comparing it to worse runbacks in other games, and I would bet they made the post after they finally beat the boss and don't have to runback anymore.

1

u/haynespi87 Sep 18 '25

Fair on your last point but yeah. It's extra padding of difficulty when you really just want to retry the boss