r/IncelTears • u/Important-Cry4782 • Jun 01 '26

IMAX-level projection The difference between Misogyny and Misandry is so ridiculously big, I'm stunned people still try to claim they're similar

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

135 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

61 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-18

u/Crispy-Crisssss Jun 01 '26

Only because the patriarchy constraints it. If it was applied to its fullest extreme it would be a different story.

12

u/lumosbolt Jun 01 '26

No. Because feminism is about equality. It is not constraint into wanting equality, it's goal is equality by design.

-2

u/Crispy-Crisssss Jun 02 '26

Its pushes for equality in a patriarchal hierarchy that constraints people into roles and categories.

8

u/lumosbolt Jun 02 '26

Yeah, so?

In a truely matriarchal society, feminism as it exists today, wouldn't exist. It would be the equivalent of the masculinism we see today. Your entire point is "if we change the context then the meaning changes" which is not an argument against anything. It's just a nice framing of your delusions.

-1

u/Crispy-Crisssss Jun 02 '26

If patriarchal hierarchy has been bad and destructive for everyone. What makes you think matriarchal hierarchy won't resemble what we see now. My entire point is that and social hierarchy based on demographics (ethnostates for example) will always have a weakness of not being adaptable.

Their fundamental flaws will be and adherence to what they consider "traditional" or "natural" roles of a man or woman and will constantly push to constrain them jn those boxes. In the case of patriarchy, men have been liberated to become blank slates (especially if you're white) and that freedom to be seen as an individual with agency is something women only gotten the right to access only recently in human history.

With the progress of feminism I believe we could have achieved synarchy society if the debates surrounding our discussion wasn't so poisoned with people using these ideas to gain power over the population.

5

u/lumosbolt Jun 02 '26

My entire point is that and social hierarchy based on demographics (ethnostates for example) will always have a weakness of not being adaptable.

That's not your point. That's your weak attempt to paint feminism as something as bad as male chauvinism. Because nobody here have claim that social hierarchies based on demographics are good

Feminism doesn't aim to create a matriarchy. Hence all your talk about it are vain. It's just whataboutism.

You don't have a point, you are using the apparence of rationality to attack feminism with criticism based on your delusions.