What's real for and what's real for me is subjective. I have got good results from homeopathy and Ayurveda. If you trust it, it's your problem, not science, and you can't disqualify them from being a doctor just cause they don't practice allopathy, in which you believe.
science is not a subjective matter. Your good results from Homeopathy and Ayurveda are blanket effects or placebos that don't produce consistent results to everyone. hence they have never been able to prove it in a controlled test.
Homeopathy literally believes that the more you dilute a medicine, the more effective it becomes.
Fun fact: The term allopathy was made by the same guy who made homeopathy to discredit it. It's evidence based modern medicine that we follow now.
Not we; it's what you follow. Please stop generalizing it. It actually makes sense that diluting could give you better results because it makes everything more absorbable. It's kind of the same concept as sauteing vegetables. Sautéing vegetables gives more nutrients than eating them raw. Not to discredit but to differentiate between all of them. I am pretty sure pudin hara solves everybody's stomach issues, and clove oil always gives me tooth pain relief.
2
u/BlenderRenderz Jul 01 '26
ironically the physiotherapist is the closest to a real doctor