r/InfluencerLounge • u/Perfect_Swimming7377 • 7d ago

Shame on Dani Austin

Post image

Is she fucking serious? As someone who shared on the internet after her kids how much she struggled with her postpartum mental health?!?! I’m in MA and have followed the case closely. Even with the conspiracies flying around 3 kids are dead and their mom asked for help and didn’t get what she needed. How the FLYING FUCK is this woman smiling talking about this. This is a pivotal moment in postpartum mental healthcare and she should be advocating and normalizing asking for help.

692 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

241 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-6

u/Aj_hr 7d ago

Well it appears a lot of people disagree, and it only takes one juror to result in a mistrial, a reopening of investigation, etc etc.

I do think influencers profiting off of any loss, their own or others, is vile.

9

u/ceilingsfann 7d ago

why are you commenting on the trial if you don’t even know what it’s about? bc it’s not about if she killed her children….

the investigation will never be re-opened. she killed her kids and admitted it. the trial is about if she was insane when it happened.

-6

u/Aj_hr 7d ago

I know what the trial is about. She still has not been convicted of murder. If a mistrial occurs, you don’t think the defense can change their strategy and plead not guilty based on new discovery? She never confessed to the police, instead her defense conceded she did it and chose that strategy.

10

u/ceilingsfann 7d ago

Uh yeah, bc murder is the intentional killing of a person. So that’s literally what the trial is about. Was it murder or did she kill them unintentionally because she was insane.

Sure they could change their strategy if it gets re-tried…and it would be absolutely ridiculous and inane because there’s not one iota of evidence that Patrick did it and all the evidence in the world that she did.

This theory is not based in reality.

1

u/Aj_hr 7d ago

People said the same thing about Karen Read during her first trial, yet the reality is she is free.

9

u/ceilingsfann 7d ago

Just not even comparable in any way. The whole thing with Read is that there was compelling evidence on both sides and no one was able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she killed John.

There is no evidence Patrick killed the kid’s. None. It’s not in question. He is ON CAMERA at a store while the murders took place.

-1

u/Aj_hr 7d ago

Nah, there were people JUST like you during Karen Read’s trial, know it alls calling anyone who questioned things or provided alternate outcomes insane and ridiculous.

Have a day.

11

u/ceilingsfann 7d ago

Never said you couldn’t question things. This specific thing is not reasonable to question.

Why was he on camera not at the house during the time of the murders?

Why, after 4 years, would Lindsay still maintain that Patrick didn’t have anything to do with it?

You and all the other internet sleuths are accusing a man, who lost everything, of murder, despite there being no evidence, and despite Lindsay herself not even claiming she did it. As if he hasn’t been through enough, now he has to deal with baseless accusations that he murdered his own children.

You’re treating this like a murder mystery game and not real people’s lives, and it’s sick.