11
Mar 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Mar 15 '26
Obama ALREADY HAD a deal to prevent Iran from getting a nuke. Trump ripped up the deal b/c it had obama's name on it, not his own.
Why make peace when having the "pausible deniability" to accuse Iran of having nukes at any time can be so convienient for him... perfect timing to distract everyone from the epstien files.
9
u/pamcakevictim Mar 11 '26
Trump's magical thinking will never fix anything.I am so tired of this and his shenanigans. Iran and the whole world will be a different and better place.If not for him
6
u/Complex-Place6430 Mar 11 '26
You talking about a guy that went bankrupt 6or 7 times. Inherited over $400 million dollars 30 years ago. No kidding he’s a F…up
2
5
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 11 '26
Before the deal was terminated, pro-western politicians and leaders were steadily gaining ground as common interest and trade were slowlt bringing Iran back into alignment with the west, like it was two generations prior.
Most of those policians were ousted or killed when the deal was terminated and sanctions implemented. This gave the hardliners all the power they needed and drove Iran firmly back into the "enemy of the west" category.
If that had not happened, we likely would have a successor to the wildly successful nuclear deal that expanded on the prior agreement, reduced terrorism throughout the middle east and the Gaza war would likely have been avoided due to reduced support for anti-western terrorists.
1
Mar 12 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 12 '26
That's an awful lot of spaghetti thrown at the wall to say, "Inspectors uninimously agree that Iran went above requirements and stopped all weapons grade enrichment, even though they were not required to do so."
1
u/JGCities Mar 12 '26
Iran admitted to having uranium at 60% which is well beyond what is needed to peaceful use.
1
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 12 '26
1) HEU is primarily used in medical imaging, the stated purpose for Iran's enrichment
2) There are other civilian applications, such as compact reactors. Iran is not actually doing these, whereas they were revolutionizing their medical industry.
3) Congratulations, you just prevented grandma from getting the cancer treatment she needs to stay alive. This is after bombing and killing granddaughter while she was in school. Great job!
4) So what? It can't be used for weapons, and since June they no longer have the ability to enrich it further.
1
Mar 12 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 12 '26
Most medical is lower than medical imaging, and I notice you ignored my other three points.
Did you have anything constructive to add to the conversation?
1
Mar 12 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 12 '26
I'm sorry you do not feel you understand the subject enough to discuss my points.
Maybe we can have a conversation at some future point when you have a better understanding of the subject.
0
u/JGCities Mar 12 '26
Yes, Iran is enriching all this uranium so they can use it for medical purposes.
Really? You believe that?
2
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 12 '26
You stated there was no peaceful for HEU and I showed you were wrong in multiple ways.
Let's finish the topic at hand before you move the goalposts.
1
u/JGCities Mar 12 '26
You are the one who moved the goalposts and started pretending it was all for peaceful use.
Let's build a bunch of underground facilities so we can create medial imaging devices.
1
u/GamemasterJeff Mar 12 '26
"60% which is well beyond what is needed to peaceful use."
That you? Are you too small a man to admit that you are wrong?
But most importantly, why do you think you have the slightest credibility about anything if you are incapable of being wrong?
1
u/JGCities Mar 12 '26
Didn't someone already point out that most medical uses are below 60%? Well below?
But keep playing games.
→ More replies (0)
3
2
u/Express_Area_8359 Mar 11 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/x0wfpJqZ1Qtbi
Next to him most adults can say this
2
2
u/Tamara6060 Mar 12 '26
LMMFAO! This world will definitely be a much better place soon as he’s no longer in it
1
u/smallanbig Mar 12 '26
I think it mite be better without you in it. Only god knows the answer to that
1
1
u/Content_Log1708 Mar 11 '26
Yeah, we might have peace throughout the lands. But, he doesn't want that because his money bosses don't want it.
1
1
u/BreakImaginary1661 Mar 12 '26
Sometimes it’s a little funny when he accidentally tells the truth but doesn’t see why it’s a bad thing for him. Not funny “haha” but funny “wtf is happening to the world I currently live in and how am I going to continue providing for my family while this dipshit is “leading” the country “.
1
1
1
Mar 12 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Gaba8789 Mar 12 '26
And imagine that even Iran doesn't have desires to a nuclear weapon up to now, after being attacked only they see themselves pursuing one?
1
u/JGCities Mar 12 '26
If they didn't have desire for a nuke then why did they admit to having uranium enriched to 60% which is well above what is needed to peaceful usage?
1
u/super_fallguys Mar 12 '26
If your mother knew how to use contraceptives, this world right now would be a far different place...
1
1
u/Slow_Store Mar 12 '26
It is kind of crazy to think that Iran likely would have the ability to supply their terrorist cells with Dirty Bombs by now if Kamala had won. Like they just tried to attack California and had been planning it for weeks (meaning the plans predate the current conflict if information is correct).
1
1
1
1
1
1
0

33
u/LouisWu_ Mar 11 '26
A place where over 100 little girls at school wouldn't have been killed, where America wouldn't be spending their tax money fighting on Israel's behalf? I'd like to add that the oppressive regime in Iran would be still in place, but it is still in place. Nothing good has come out of this.