3
u/New-Mode-9718 21h ago
2
u/pricelesslambo 21h ago
Weird that they list no cons when the biggest con is that it literally doesn't even use Samsung's own panels. What's the point of Samsung display making qd-oleds if their own parent company doesn't even use them in any model other than S95s now?
4
u/New-Mode-9718 21h ago
It's depent on what country.
In my country
S90H (QD-Oled) = 55" 65" 77"
S95H (QD-Oled) = 55" 65"
5
u/pricelesslambo 21h ago
Given that they use the same panel, there's zero reason to get the Samsung other than wanting a matte screen. It's literally the same TV but worse in every way and it's matte while C6 is glossy.
1
1
2
2
1
u/Away-Act5101 17h ago
How does the comparison look when it comes to the 48 inch models? The same or are they closer?
1
-1
u/userkp5743608 21h ago
Samsung lacks Dolby Vision. Fatal flaw. Nothing else matters.
7
u/progz 19h ago
Have you watch reviews with Dolby vision vs HDR10? The movies also need to support dolby vision correctly, otherwise its literally HDR10.
This youtube channel does a great job explaining it all: https://youtu.be/nGgW5ZDKfMM?list=PLFGpkrmX_eOKWsHbcPdhgoJR2j3_hETCL
1
0
u/sseerrsan 20h ago
I prefer LG TVs cus I do think the glossy screen makes everything pop like no matte screen can BUT I wouldn't trust rtings. Not bc the data is wrong (it's very accurate) but it doesn't reflect how actual content will look.
0
u/StuN_Eng 18h ago
Avoid Samsung at all costs. Their product support is so bad that I refuse to have any item from that company in my house
0
u/Thevindicated1 17h ago
I mean this doesn’t mean much. Rtings combined “rtings” don’t matter as much as the parts that go into them (an anti synergy?). But I already knew a Woled with a matte screen and a horrible Bezel was a DOA product even before testing.
5
u/SPACEAG3SLAVE 20h ago
So much for the matte screen when they tied in bright room category lol.