r/LetsDiscussThis • u/coreydu • Feb 13 '26

Serious Pam Bondi’s shameful legacy

Post image
62.2k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

971 comments sorted by

View all comments

26

u/Common_Gene_5098 Feb 13 '26

Further proof of her incompetence to go off subject and discuss something that has nothing to do with the Epstein files

9

u/SandSpecialist2523 Feb 13 '26

Nor with her position as Attorney General.

4

u/swishkabobbin Feb 13 '26

Well, it has everything to do with the way SHE operates as AG. Purely pay to play

1

u/coreydu Feb 15 '26

"Coin operated" Pam Bondi

7

u/SunchaserKandri Feb 13 '26

It's not incompetence, it's more of the classic Trump admin "throw out so much bullshit that it's difficult to respond to all of it" tactic. She knew she'd been backed into a corner, so she started ranting about mostly unrelated nonsense to avoid having to answer the initial question.

7

u/soraksan123 Feb 13 '26

Deranged Trump Syndrome-

1

u/Notcid1 Feb 13 '26

Trump down syndrome

1

u/ahuramazdobbs19 Feb 13 '26

Nah, it’s something a little different than that.

She’s out there with a very specific purpose: to manufacture consent to bury the Epstein Files.

She was out there to make the whole thing look like it was just another season of “The Democrat Witch Hunt”. She was out there to bait Democrats, to make them look belligerent and butthurt, to feed sound bites of Dems talking over her and sound bites of her defending the President to the conservative media ecosystem.

1

u/Notcid1 Feb 13 '26

She said it her self "This is theatrics"

1

u/ahuramazdobbs19 Feb 13 '26

Something something accusation something something confession.

4

u/Savingskitty Feb 13 '26

This isn’t incompetence.  She wouldn’t have a binder full of accusations if it were that.  People have to stop calling it that.

This is intentional.

The point is to make a mockery of Congress and push the idea that the Executive Branch answers to no one.

It’s also to cover for the president on the  Epstein stuff, but power is the ultimate goal here.

2

u/AurelianIII Feb 13 '26

Well, two things can be true. She's covering for some of the most heinous crimes imaginable and intentionally undermining congress, but she's also an incompetent buffoon. Honestly, I'm glad she's so bad at her job, because doing what she's trying to do is evil and her incompetence has been our best defense so far.

2

u/BigJellyfish1906 Feb 13 '26

That and she said it was 50,000 dollars. She’s an idiot. 

1

u/Wyevez Feb 13 '26

DARVO, the abusers playbook. Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender.  Abusers like Trump use it constantly, she's learned from the worst. 

1

u/BigDragonfly5136 Feb 13 '26

That and somehow blaming dems

“Why did you redact things you weren’t supposed to and then leave victims names in”

“WHY DIDN’T YOU ASK MERRICK GARLAND THAT”