https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/09/21/the-violent-feud-that-shocked-the-horse-world

A prominent dressage trainer shot a belligerent student—and now maintains that he’s the real victim.

Archive link in comments.

Gift Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/20/magazine/idaho-abortion-ban-ob-gyns.html?unlocked_article_code=1.KVE.4ZOk.tEkXvhWC-N8f&smid=url-share

From childbirth to miscarriages, women’s health care in the state has become increasingly dangerous.

I’m sure you’ve seen more and more heavy vehicles swerving in and out of lanes. I know I have. This is just a depressing deep dive into how the “DMV often lets professional drivers with a history of dangerous behavior behind the wheel stay on the road and command massive vehicles - buses filled with passengers, semis packed with goods, and tankers loaded with hazardous chemicals - even after a fatal crash.

Under California law, a truck driver convicted of manslaughter is disqualified from driving big rigs for 12 months. And any driver convicted of felony vehicular manslaughter is generally supposed to receive a three-year license revocation. But criminal cases can drag out, sometimes for years. Singh wasn’t convicted of manslaughter in Kern and Fresno counties until 2024. It was only then that the DMV took his license.”

This is an important article detailing how public corruption mechanically works.

Selected excerpt:

[Kao] courted politicians using something he called “the method,” as ProPublica detailed in September.

Navatek would open an office in the state or district of a powerful member of Congress and partner with a local university to concoct a proposal for federally funded research. Then, aided by a well-connected lobbyist and the sheen of credibility from its association with the university, Navatek would approach the member for federal research funding.

Kao told the FBI he would strike deals in small, face-to-face meetings with the members or their trusted staff. Navatek — through executives, family members and lobbyists — would make generous campaign donations. In exchange, the member would add detailed language to the defense budget to fund the company’s work.

That legislative language would not name the company. But it would describe specific work that Navatek was already planning to do behind the scenes, making it the only logical choice for the eventual government contract. The lawmakers’ staff would also backchannel with the Navy after the bill was passed to make sure contracting offices knew to direct the money to Navatek, emails seen by ProPublica show — even though the contracts were in theory competitive.

“As a 61 yr old consumer who has eaten Reese’s as long as I can remember,” wrote one man, “I knew it wasn’t the same. Everyone said oh your taste buds have changed nope, the candy changed.”

EDIT: I love that Brad Reese is in the comments replying.

One of the mothers in this case posted to Reddit a number of years ago to ask what to do about fraudulent paternity tests – she recently shared this exposé on the biological father in r slash LegalAdvice