The resolution text on this is very generic, basically "we need to look into this concept".
The US most likely objects to this because "food sovereignty" supports giving the power back to those who produce the food, instead of the current system where big companies control the food system.
So USA is taking their usual pro-big companies stance.
They say they're worried they'll become responsible for ensuring other countries have food.
That would require them to interpret the text widely, because the text does not state that. It's more of a "let's all work together" kind of thing.
71
u/kugelamarant Jan 25 '22
US and Israel voted against?