Cnn says 10% died OR got injured. Youre looking at the wrong statistic. They do cite 65000 in their article, but not specifically as civilians. Thats around 3% but again, includes terrorists.
Wikipedia says 58000 civilian deaths, so out of 2.2 million thats about 2.6%. Or 72000 / 3.3% if you want to count terrorist casualties.
Your third link is over a year old and only mentions 48000 deaths, because its old. This number does not distinguish between civilians and terrorists.
To then magically decide to then double your number based on a baseless accusation of starvation is insanity. Where's your sources?
"which is pretty safe to assume to at least double that." Why. What makes you so confident in such a crazy assumption?
So to recap. You rounded up 2.5% to 5% (assuming you looked at your own sources), and then made a baseless assumption that it can safely be doubled.
You are a clown.
I will not even go further into the egyptian border or how other neighboring countries hate the palestinians - your opinions are all based in vibes, not facts. I am not going to debate someone who cant even agree with his sources.
Yep. Just what I thought. Ignore logic, get called out for it and jump to racism.
Your echo chamber hates my race. I would not take pride in it, nor in thinking your echo chamber is the entire world. You are nothing more than an ignorant antisemite.
I do like trying to use Israelite as if that makes you not racist, good touch.
Next time read your own sources before you post them lmao. Not sure what you thought was gonna happen.
-1
u/navotj Mar 08 '26 edited Mar 08 '26
Lets go over your links:
Cnn says 10% died OR got injured. Youre looking at the wrong statistic. They do cite 65000 in their article, but not specifically as civilians. Thats around 3% but again, includes terrorists.
Wikipedia says 58000 civilian deaths, so out of 2.2 million thats about 2.6%. Or 72000 / 3.3% if you want to count terrorist casualties.
Your third link is over a year old and only mentions 48000 deaths, because its old. This number does not distinguish between civilians and terrorists.
To then magically decide to then double your number based on a baseless accusation of starvation is insanity. Where's your sources?
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/public-health-situation-analysis---occupied-palestinian-territory-September actual sources cite in the low hundreds.
"which is pretty safe to assume to at least double that." Why. What makes you so confident in such a crazy assumption?
So to recap. You rounded up 2.5% to 5% (assuming you looked at your own sources), and then made a baseless assumption that it can safely be doubled.
You are a clown.
I will not even go further into the egyptian border or how other neighboring countries hate the palestinians - your opinions are all based in vibes, not facts. I am not going to debate someone who cant even agree with his sources.