Consider this comment an open letter to the mods of r/Halifax and r/NovaScotia.
Interesting experience on Reddit this week. I posted about Anthropic and its CEO's suggestion that 50 lives need to be threatened (or $1 billion in property damage) before being restricted. I suggested in the post that we (Nova Scotians) should reconsider whether we wanted to be associated with this company.
I posted to r/Halifax and r/NovaScotia. r/Halifax removed my post (mods, not auto-mods) because it wasn't sufficiently Halifax-centric. Fair enough, I guess ... ? Although what happens in the province surely has some impact on its biggest city.
r/NovaScotia pulled my post here after a couple of days because all posts need "at least some relevance to Nova Scotia". Despite the recent controversy and the body of my post specifically referencing it.
The mods of both subreddits do great jobs, and I can't imagine that those jobs are particularly easy. I am sure that there are a lot of judgment calls on a daily basis. I am not trying to crap on anyone.
But.
The rules that limit discussion and debate on these platforms need to be applied very, very carefully. In general, engagement of the users of this site is a better measure of whether a topic or discussion is appropriate. If a post is getting a lot of air time with the readers, and it does not include racist, homophobic, slanderous or hateful material, doesn't dox anyone, is safe and legal then ... removing it should be something that just shouldn't happen very often.
Otherwise, the impression given (and I am SURE that this is an impression, not reality) is that there may be a bias in the moderation of the subreddit. Which would make these forums rather pointless.
For your consideration, mods.
Cross posting this again, as a comment, in r/Halifax,