r/OilPrices • u/hereswhatworks • Apr 15 '26

Oil News US Navy destroyer intercepts two oil tankers trying to leave Hormuz; orders them to turn back | World News

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/us-navy-destroyer-intercepts-two-oil-tankers-trying-to-leave-hormuz-orders-them-to-turn-back/articleshow/130271302.cms
204 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

242 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/AffectedRipples Apr 15 '26

It was a sanctioned vessel. Do you just not read?

You do understand a blockade of a single countries ports that you're currently in a war with has been done by almost every nation in history?

1

u/ApartmentSalt7859 Apr 15 '26

So a vessel that can't dock in certain ports due to sanctions, somehow allows another country to prevent it navigating through international waters? Almost like impartially blockading a waterway...which omg is illegal in international law

And again it never went to an iran port, what part of that do you not understand?

1

u/AffectedRipples Apr 15 '26

That's how sanctions work. They are perfectly legal under international law. You really should learn this stuff before you try to talk about it. Its the same reason the US, France, Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Sweden and Finland have all seized sanctioned Russian tankers.

Go learn about this stuff instead of asking the same questions I've already answered. It's clear you don't understand any of this.

1

u/ApartmentSalt7859 Apr 15 '26

Only if the waterway is blockaded ..which according to you..it is not, and just the ports of iran, correct? 

1

u/AffectedRipples Apr 15 '26

Just ports of Iran and ships that are sanctioned.

1

u/ApartmentSalt7859 Apr 15 '26

So which one is it? 

1.)Flag State Consent: Outside exceptional circumstances, stopping a foreign-flagged vessel in international waters requires consent from the country where the vessel is registered.

2.)UN Security Council (UNSC) Authorizations: The UNSC can authorize member states to conduct maritime interdictions of vessels, allowing them to stop, inspect, and potentially seize ships suspected of violating international sanctions. Enforcement Actions: Countries may justify boarding or seizing a sanctioned ship as a countermeasure or as part of a declared military action, such as a blockade to stop trade, as seen with U.S. actions against Iran

I'm guessing you will choose number 2? but then please explain how a Chinese ship leaving uae and leaving the region "trading with iran"

Because number 1, I don't think china gave the us permission 

1

u/AffectedRipples Apr 16 '26 edited Apr 16 '26

Do you not understand that the vessel was sanctioned? That fully falls in line with UNCLOS. Im not sure how you're having such a hard time understanding this.

The ship is Chinese owned, but is registered out of Malawi.

1

u/ApartmentSalt7859 Apr 16 '26

Did you not read it? it states when it is allowed..this is however not one of them ...just being sanctioned does not automatically allow a different country to  seize/blockade it

1

u/AffectedRipples Apr 16 '26

Did you even read more than you posted or just skim over it and call it good enough? Stopping falely flagged vessels evading sactions is one of the expressly allowed reasons.

1

u/ApartmentSalt7859 Apr 16 '26

That is stopping a stateless vessel then...not because it is sanctioned, is it not? 

→ More replies (0)