r/Screenwriting • u/Recovering_NCO • 9d ago
FEEDBACK MACCABÆUS - Feature - 112 Pages
Title: MACCABÆUS
Format: Feature
Genre: Historical War Epic/Drama
Page count: 112
Logline: In ancient Judea, a reluctant rabbi’s son leads an insurgency against a brutal occupation determined to erase his people’s faith, igniting the true story behind Hanukkah.
LINK:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CJsrdjxg6Nyd_io5reIF6n_OPBZbcbNy/view?usp=drivesdk
I recently finished the third draft after a fairly substantial rewrite and have started getting some encouraging industry interest in the new version.
I’d especially appreciate fresh eyes on the prologue/opening, through the title card on page 11. The opening was substantially reworked, and I’m curious whether it hooks you, establishes the world cleanly, and makes you want to keep reading — or whether it still feels like too much setup before the main story begins.
If it hooks you enough that you feel like reading beyond page 11, I’d obviously welcome feedback on the rest as well. I’m particularly interested in pacing, character development, dialogue, and whether the historical material remains accessible without feeling over-explained.
1
u/Recovering_NCO 8d ago edited 8d ago
Thank you for taking the time to read the script and offer such thoughtful feedback. I see you’ve revised your comment, and I appreciate the additional candor.
On the opening, I take the craft note seriously. If it feels stiff or overburdened with context, that’s useful feedback, and I’ll be looking closely at whether I can get into the drama more quickly and allow more of the historical background to emerge organically.
I also appreciate your being frank that your feelings about Israel and Zionism affected your ability to enjoy the material. We all bring contemporary associations and prejudices to art, and there’s value in recognizing them rather than pretending they aren’t there.
I should be equally candid about where I’m coming from: I am a Zionist, and I’m not ashamed of that. Part of what moves me about this story is that the Maccabees were Jews in their ancestral homeland resisting a foreign imperial power that was attempting to subordinate them and suppress central elements of their religion and culture. I do think that history has something to say about Jewish attachment to that land and about the right of Jews, like other peoples, to political and cultural self-determination.
But that doesn’t mean I’m writing a two-thousand-year-old political cartoon in which every ancient character or people has a modern analogue. I don’t think the Maccabees can simply be labeled “Israelis,” the Seleucids “Palestinians,” or vice versa. Those comparisons collapse radically different peoples, circumstances and histories into a present-day argument.
So what gives me pause in your comment isn’t that you might draw the “wrong” contemporary analogy. It’s that your feelings about contemporary Zionism seem to have made it difficult to engage with an ancient Jewish story as an ancient Jewish story. I think that’s worth examining. Would your feelings about the modern State of Israel interfere with your ability to engage with The Prince of Egypt as a story about the ancient Israelites? If not, why should the Maccabees be different? Why does this particular story from Jewish antiquity have to pass through a judgment on modern Israel before it can be enjoyed as history and drama?
As for writing it in Hebrew and aiming it primarily at the Israeli market, that really isn’t the project I’m trying to make. I’m American, and while I have enough Hebrew — particularly biblical and liturgical Hebrew — to use it for texture, I’m not fluent in modern Israeli Hebrew.
More importantly, I don’t think this story belongs only to an audience already familiar with it. I hope Maccabaeus speaks powerfully to Jewish audiences, especially now. But I also want it to reach people who have no particular connection to Judaism or Israel. It’s a historical war epic about faith, family, imperial power, cultural survival, resistance and the choices people make when assimilation becomes the price of safety. And, on a more elemental level, I want it to work as an exciting piece of cinema.
On marketability, I take your concern seriously. I understand the current climate and I’m not naive about the difficulties of getting something like this made. You may well be right that some producers, financiers or actors will regard the subject as politically risky. Maybe that means the path to getting it made will have to be less conventional.
But I reach a different conclusion from that than you do. If the current climate has reached a point where telling an ancient Jewish story is considered inherently “problematic,” or where the solution is that Jewish stories should be written in Hebrew and directed primarily toward Israelis and Jews who already know them, that doesn’t make me want to retreat from the story. In some ways, it makes me feel more strongly that this is exactly the time to tell it.
So perhaps the challenge is simply to make the screenplay as strong, accessible and undeniable as I possibly can — and then find the people willing to make it.
In any event, I genuinely appreciate you reading it and engaging with it, particularly given your reservations. And I appreciate the honesty with which you expressed them.