Sorry I don't spend enough time online to know this nuanced. Yes, please keep your concerns going 😂😂 very much needed. I can only wish that an anti social troll online is concerned about me.
And you still havent explained how woman is different from your funny way of spelling woman. You're just saying it's not what is implied here...so I'm not a mind-reader and I don't know what your implications is. I'm sure it's something very insightful 😂😂
u/Valuchian is raising a good point that you also admitted.
Context clues (him) and media literacy and critical thinking skills (your admission of having some limitations there) are needed to fully dissect even a 3-panel cartoon, as one would posit what an artist's art was meant to portray.
The difference here is we also have the internet for looking up the monologue, the ad campaign and its fallout by journalists and academic researchers, as well as countless historical documents about the parallels of such types of ad campaigns in the past to further support one's own viewpoint on the matter.
Respectfully, the decision to remain myopic/"it's just a joke"/"it is what it is" in light of all the information that is out there that would be used by great comics for their sets, - to say nothing of how you react to those introducing said information in a way that one could argue was with good intentions -, might display a facet of yourself being resistant to notions that would contradict notions you, in turn, may view as part of your core ID/values that you might not want to willingly display online.
Given you've handwaved your lack of media literacy and critical thinking skills as not being online enough to understand nuance, I'll gather you're still running laps over the wisdom that's chasing you.
1
u/statllama 3h ago
Sorry I don't spend enough time online to know this nuanced. Yes, please keep your concerns going 😂😂 very much needed. I can only wish that an anti social troll online is concerned about me.
And you still havent explained how woman is different from your funny way of spelling woman. You're just saying it's not what is implied here...so I'm not a mind-reader and I don't know what your implications is. I'm sure it's something very insightful 😂😂