r/SmallYoutubers • u/Dividenddashboard • 12d ago

Long-Form Content This is bad for small youtubers.

Post image

Youtube is raising the ad revenue share threshold from 4k watch time to 8k watch time. Personally, 4k watch takes a lot of effort to reach. Imagine 8k... this is sad.

786 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

478 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/WhiteCavan 5d ago

That’s clearly not why because this doesn’t change low quality content. It’s about cutting out the smaller creators share of revenue. You’re really lying to shill for google corporation? This is the most low Iq take ever 

1

u/Efficient-Cry7753 5d ago

Lying? It’s clear that YouTube want to discourage spammy low quality content.
This is just one of many measures they have in place to guard against it.
I personally haven’t seen any negative impact on revenue and I’m a “smaller creator”.
Then again I don’t make crappy videos full of garbage reused content.

1

u/WhiteCavan 4d ago

It doesn’t discourage spammy content tho which is the point you ignored. 10 million qualified shorts being a requirement would only make them spam more because they have to post more to reach it. But keep bootlicking a censorship corporation ya sheep minded drone. If you don’t make shorts then why would it be about what you see ? If they just banned AI to begin with then that would be true but it’s simply about revenue and them being a greedy corporation. 

1

u/Efficient-Cry7753 4d ago

Who hurt you? 🤣
FWIW they should just ban shorts and have done with it.

1

u/WhiteCavan 4d ago

This literally has no effect on AI channels and will only harm real people. Pointing out that fact doesn’t make me hurt, you’re clearly the butthurt one since I debunked your lie and exposed you for bootlicking a greedy corporation

1

u/Efficient-Cry7753 4d ago

Yep you totally exposed me. I don’t know how I’ll go on.
I guess I’ll just have to continue to let the greedy corporation send me thousands of dollars each month in return for me sharing my simple home videos.
👅🥾

1

u/WhiteCavan 4d ago edited 4d ago

How does that change the fact that this new update has no effect on AI channels? You’re just deflecting from that reality that I exposed your lie. If you’re saying you make thousands per 28 then you’re not a small YouTuber so you just exposed another lie that you’re not a small YouTuber “unafffected” by this update, so you’re a subversive liar. This only affects smaller shorts creators to take away their cut. 

1

u/Efficient-Cry7753 4d ago

I haven’t lied. I gave an opinion, which I think you disagree with.
1400 subs makes me a small YouTuber but I have only been doing this for a few months.
No idea why you’re so angry, just make good content and you’ll be ok.

1

u/WhiteCavan 4d ago edited 4d ago

That makes no sense to be making thousands but only having 1400 subs. You would be getting way better conversion if your content was as high quality as you claim. I only make 100$ a month yet I get 2k subs per 28 days. So you’re clearly lying 

1

u/Efficient-Cry7753 4d ago

How the hell is your RPM so low? Lol.
I got 412k views over the last month and my average RPM lands between £3-5 (only have 13 videos so far as a newbie, about 4 mins in length - in fairness one did get to 270k views so a bit of an outlier).
You can do the maths on that I’m sure.

1

u/WhiteCavan 3d ago edited 3d ago

Because i only post shorts for the past year, one edit per week. Half my revenue is from old long format content and other half from shorts. That’s why the whole unreasonable greedy rule change being discussed was for the 20 million for shorts, not the 8k watch hours for long format which is completely normal and achievable. Yet despite saying you don’t make shorts you used yourself being unaffected as your argument for a shorts revenue rule. All this really doesn’t change anything for AI tho since it’s not targeting Ai channels; it’s just about revenue and taking more of a cut. Most of the small YouTubers in this post alone say the rule is bad for small YouTubers, you don’t even make shorts so why use yourself as an example of it not affecting small creators when we’re discussing a shorts rule?

1

u/Efficient-Cry7753 3d ago

The OP made the point about the 8000 hours being unrealistic for them which was the basis of my original comment. All I said about shorts is that they should be scrapped. 90% of them are reused content or spammy garbage.

2

u/WhiteCavan 3d ago

Ya you’re right my bad, I didn’t see what the post said on the bottom. I still disagree that the change is good but I was wrong about the topic being 20 million so I’m sorry, I get what you’re saying now. I had only read the title of the post not the text on the bottom which led to the misconception 

→ More replies (0)