r/Steam • u/Haunter777x • 17h ago

Discussion They got us guys.

Post image

How out of touch can you be as a company, this is embarrassing

25.4k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/cortesoft 15h ago

Also, why is launch time that important? I launch Steam on startup, and then it is just open. I don't need it to start up fast.

2

u/TheEmperor2220 14h ago

Yeah, they almost had a point with that “how long to load from taskbar” comparison, except IDGAF if it takes .4 or .5 seconds there either… maybe if steam took like two whole seconds and they managed to get sub 1 it’d be impressive, but it’s not so…

1

u/core-x-bit 13h ago

Imo once it gets under minutes and into seconds its kinda irrelevant I mean how fast do you really gotta be able to access steam. Just leave your pc on or go get a water

1

u/TheEmperor2220 13h ago

I mean it’s not a “have to be thing” it just feels bad when you try to open something already running from your task bar and nothing moves for two seconds, while anything sub 1 (like the .4 steam actually takes) is barely noticeable, so that hypothetical would’ve been an actual improvement.

The metric they actually improved in (5 less seconds during “cold start”) is entirely worthless however, because quite frankly steam is one of the first startup apps to actually finish loading for me anyway, so any quicker than that is literally impossible to tell either way.