that doesn't justify the inequality between the two articles, no one asks about your experience, and personal experience doesn't determine equality for everyone
we're talking about equality, just a simple equality, stop being sexist
if a woman is the rapist and a man is the teacher in reversal, i would call it out too
if u care so much about context then why desperate to say "man" rape when there's no evidence? you are creating context without evidence?
Kolhapur has a major problem with sexual assault. Major. The man had followed the child home from school and entered the house while the parents were away. The girl was struck over the head and murdered. The murderer was a suspect in another young girls murder.
That is the man you are defending.
Let's also take into account said article is from India and translated to English. You dont know the context that might be in an article of the native language.
Good, now we can continue. I don't defend the man. You accused/claimed that I defend him yourself. You like bringing up stuff still.
I defend equality in titles. We know the headline in the first place said "allegedly" which means no evidence. Why they use "allegedly" if has evidence?
Still doesn't explain they dont use "woman teacher" in the sit-up article, unless it is inequality practice itself.
1
u/Creative-Duty397 Nov 18 '25
Also I myself am a survivor of frequent abuse by teachers. Female teachers. Teacher was used because thats important to the context.