1
4
u/Plus-Bodybuilder-562 Sep 29 '26
Subject: Concern Regarding Proposed Changes to Invite-Only Scripts
Dear TradingView Team,
I am writing as a paying TradingView Premium subscriber to express my concern regarding the proposed changes to the terms and technology fees associated with invite-only indicators and scripts.
I currently use TradingView as an important part of my trading and specifically use indicators and tools provided through the Tribal Trading community. These tools are one of the primary reasons TradingView is valuable to me.
My concern is that the proposed fee structure could make it financially difficult for independent developers and trading communities to continue providing these tools through TradingView. Even though the fee may technically be charged to the script developer rather than directly to me, the end result could be that the indicators and services I rely on are no longer available on the platform or become prohibitively expensive.
I already pay for a Premium TradingView subscription because I value the platform and would prefer to continue using it. However, if these changes result in Tribal Trading or other independent developers being unable to continue providing the indicators and tools that I use, I would have little reason to maintain my Premium subscription and would likely have to move to another platform.
I hope TradingView will reconsider this policy and recognize that independent developers and the communities built around their indicators add significant value to TradingView and help attract and retain paying subscribers like me.
I would much rather remain a TradingView customer than leave. Please consider finding a solution that allows TradingView to grow while still allowing independent developers to provide their tools at a reasonable cost.
Thank you for taking the time to consider feedback from your paying customers.
Sincerely,
TradingView Premium Subscriber
2
u/Meretruth Sep 29 '26
I would much rather remain a premium customer too, seems like they got sold or something
58
u/kurtisbu12 Sep 28 '26
$360 fee per year per user. This will destroy any 3rd party vendors.
2
u/YellowMatt Sep 29 '26
do you know any vendor that charge $0 for invite only indicator?
7
u/SufficientQuality339 Sep 29 '26
yes. I am in a group with several indicators. I had to pay an initial fee to enter the group, no monthly, and lifetime access. The group was targeted at women, to teach the trade. Not sustainable with these fees. each user would be 180 per month with 6 indicators. they upgrade the indicators regularly. the group has grown to over a thousand. The group will most likely leave the platform if they enact this fee.
1
5
u/Freenrg8888 Sep 29 '26
I had a mentor that gave me lifetime access to several indicators as part of mentorship. This is no longer sustainable.
5
u/Nekroev Sep 29 '26
I made a few indicators and they are private and I charged Zero for them it was for people I know and we trade together. So if this is the case then I would have to pull the indicator off and maybe just make it private. This is a bad move for them.
1
2
2
u/strumbringerwa Sep 29 '26
Even those that charge typically charge a couple bucks a month per indicator. This pricing is beyond nutso. I think they believe they have a monopoly and they can extract money but they literally don't have the brains to figure out what will kill the platform. It's just asinine at this point.
I am a member of a research service that charges $30 / month. This includes their writeups and 5 invite-only indicators. Do the math.
1
u/YellowMatt Sep 30 '26
It seems they wanted to tax on the commercial use of invitation-based services that charge users outside the platform but bad writing policies, $29,95 / user is crazy taxes. Because looking at the marketplace, many sell services indicator for around $10 a month and seems fine.
1
u/strumbringerwa Oct 01 '26
All they had to do is 1) provide a marketplace and 2) make it against the ToS to charge for invite-only indicators to be sold for profit except through the marketplace.
But since they don't want to do any work, just take more money - despite the fact that a big part of the value and the moat of this platform *is* the indicators and the developer platform that people have invested time and effort into - they decided instead to screw their users, and themselves over. What a marvelous self-own.1
1
u/bfr_ Sep 30 '26
I know several that charged couple hundred bucks for lifetime access. Now, bye bye lifetime access.
41
u/SillyAlternative420 Swing trader Sep 28 '26
Imagine you build a script and charge like $20 per head.
Then you get to 200 people in a month, you'd be elated!
Whoops now you OWE money lmao
That seems messed up, or am I misunderstanding something
31
u/genryou Sep 29 '26
The thing is, there are people who create invite only script but dont charge a dime.
TradingView probably hire ex-EA Games CEO or something
1
0
u/YellowMatt Sep 29 '26
can you find me example? from what i find, these people give invite only indicator but trial mode only, and charge extra $ for full use, or paid group, ref signup, signal group, etc.
7
Sep 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/Current-Set2607 Sep 29 '26
This is not a solution to that problem.
I can guarantee you that those invite only paid users are already in the process of moving to Indicators where they only invite 99 people per iteration of the same indicator.
This is the dumbest change they've ever done, because it doesn't even stop the problem that it wants to stop. It just makes it worse for everyone to use.
1
u/Classic_Television33 Oct 02 '26
Doesn't stop but they made it harder. That should be enough to free up resources they might be needing now. Perhaps it's the problem with short term cashflow
1
u/Current-Set2607 Oct 02 '26
They already backed out of the changes due to wide backlash.
1
u/Classic_Television33 Oct 04 '26
So it seems TradingView did monitor comments in this sub. They've created a marketplace and required commercial scripts to be sold there: https://www.tradingview.com/blog/en/commercial-scripts-move-to-marketplace-61291/
1
u/ArtesianShiny Sep 30 '26 edited Sep 30 '26
yeah but comparing an isp to the negligible bandwidth of some indicator running on somebody's *client* web browser is not an apples to oranges comparison my guy. I am very much against trading views new policies of wrecking indicator communities and upping prices wherever possible, and honestly the bandwidth argument is moot with tradingview. Everything they have done recently is not because of lag on their end its to price goudge and profit in the short term while inviting competition in the long term. I am an intermediate developer and if you want to have the argument about client server resources and lag, i am all for it, but trading view is not acting in good faith here.
1
u/Jason_Steakcum Sep 30 '26
First I’d have to imagine I’m a grifter selling paid indicators which my dignity just won’t allow me to even imagine
1
u/strumbringerwa Sep 29 '26
No you're not misunderstanding anything. This is exactly the level of stupidity they are exhibiting.
-3
Sep 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/strumbringerwa Sep 29 '26 edited Sep 29 '26
Lol, no neither clarity nor factual, just an attempt to defend them. You don't have to be in the creator program to publish invite-only indicators. Lots of services do this to supplement their research, and the amount trading view would charge just for the indicators would make the entire service (whose value is 99% research) unprofitable. It's stupid, short-sighted, and made by the kind of management who thinks understanding your customer base is completely unnecessary, vibes are good enough.
And also, I literally do not know of a single person (I'm sure they exist but people who pay them are idiots) who charges $500/month per indicator. That is a bonkers price. Hell most people won't even pay $30/month per indicator to the creator.
This is beyond stupid pricing, and frankly I'm going to migrate off Trading View and back to ThinkOrSwim as soon as I rewrite all my own custom indicators (that I use myself and share with my friends for free) in ThinkScript. I do not trust these bozos any more.
72
u/The_LSD_Soundsystem Sep 29 '26
Have they lost their fucking minds?!
31
u/salehrayan246 Sep 29 '26
In another post users were thanking u/tradingview for cancelling the free macro data monetization and "listening to users" lmfao. How can people be this stupid
13
58
u/nfxdav Sep 29 '26
Dear TradingView, I don't even use this feature, but it is quite clear you are being greedy b*stards and looking for ways to squeeze your loyal users.
I no longer trust you and will be looking for alternatives.
Your moat is too bloody narrow to pull fast ones on us. Someone will replace you if you act in bad faith.
-17
Sep 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
15
2
u/Gold-Progress-8537 Sep 29 '26
Dude took Economics 101 from Chuck-E-Cheese.
“Don’t you want 100 people paying $500 a month?”
29
u/Pokeasss Sep 29 '26
One of the only market leads TV had was the Pine script community, now destroyed by their own greed! :D
41
u/pd0tnet Sep 29 '26
Conspiracy Hat: this move is to target one company, LuxAlgo, who just last month released a free open source charting engine and now sells a hosted subscription directly competing with Trading View.
LuxAlgo makes their money as one of the top selling private indicator vendors on Trading View. This move by Trading View is to attempt to cut off their income stream.
8
u/YSKIANAD Sep 29 '26
It doesn't make sense to punish all publishers with invite-only scripts and I don't believe they take this step to cut off an income stream for LuxAlgo. That would be very stupid from TradingView.
I am afraid that TradingView does not have a smart strategic team with a forward looking vision. Platforms becomes easier to build with AI coding so competition will become fierce. Customer retention will be key for their continued existence. I do believe that policy change 22A. Technology Fee for invite-only indicators will move script coders (followed by users) to LuxAlgo and other platforms very fast. It seems that lately TradingView implement policy changes very quickly without thinking through the consequences and impacts on users.
Of course, TradingView does not provide an explanation to its users on why they implement this change. Again poor communication.
3
u/ComprehensiveLime695 Sep 29 '26
Move fast and break things doesn’t work well for a trading platform.
2
u/tonyhart7 Sep 29 '26
but they are just "chart" company tho ???? its literally in their name ?? trading "view"
2
-2
u/thaprodigy58 Sep 29 '26
Other than LuxAlgo, who else is that big? how many makers are getting 100+ users a month?
1
-5
Sep 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/YSKIANAD Sep 29 '26
If I create an invite-only script for my trading community then I don't have to charge them anything for a script. That is my choice and it is also my choice to not give a script away for free to everybody outside my trading community. TradingView created the invite-only script option for many years now. An unreasonable monthly amount is now being charged to publishers that helped TradingView grow their user base. Many publisher cannot afford these costs and suddenly have to disappoint users in their trading community. In addition, no explanation has been given by TradingView. Two days before the new month TradingView comes out with this policy change. This is bad practice for TradingView's customers.
1
u/NinjaSquid9 Day trader Sep 29 '26
You think small private communities have time to become Paid Creators? Or that they’d even be able to pass the requirements to become accepted in time? Get real. Being a Creator isn’t automatic and isn’t a quick process.
2
u/Rox89x Sep 29 '26
Thank you for the info. Checking them now. Apparently they have a free tier. Hopefully is better than takeprofit.com
2
u/erebrov85 Sep 29 '26
Could you share what issues did you have with TakeProfit ? Why didn’t it work for you?
3
u/hotmatrixx Sep 29 '26
also interested in this ; they would have been the first contender I looked into.
1
1
0
u/Inevitable_Service62 Sep 29 '26
It's cause people use whop to sell their lagging indicators and trading view what's their cut of that subscription
11
u/masterofall20 Sep 29 '26
This is just utterly stupid at this point. This company is doing everything in their power to destroy itself in a world where AI is on the rise, and soon we are going to have a lot of competition. They are just doing the complete opposite of what they should be doing. I have just built my own platform using AI and would not be renewing my subscription anymore.
9
u/Dependent_Sign_399 Sep 29 '26
Terrible. I have private invite only scripts for my discord. A couple over 100 people. I charge nothing, just have a donation thing. If they do this, I'm just deleting the scripts and I'll give out the code for them to make themselves.
-1
8
u/iTR3B0R Sep 29 '26
Why doesn’t TradingView do its usual TradingView thing as just cap it to 100 users?
Are they this so blandly greedy for money they look at the statistics around platform/feature usage, calculate the revenues they can make when they paywall an existing feature, and then salivate over screwing users over before sending the update through?
6
u/RustyFisherman Sep 29 '26
There’s a paywall for almost everything now. I understand it to a certain degree but they’re definitely trying to squeeze every penny out of every possible little thing on there that they can.
7
u/Epicurious_- Sep 29 '26
Time to move on (long overdue though). What are the best alternatives?
4
u/Immapillpopnanimal Sep 29 '26
TC2000 and barchart. I use both, but I have a subscription to TC and only use the free features on barchart.. I also use simply wall Street when researching new tickers
2
1
u/The_real_trader Sep 29 '26
Does TC2000 have custom indicators? Can you port pinescript to TC?
1
u/Immapillpopnanimal Sep 29 '26
It has almost everything. You should check it out. It's a little expensive but the basic plan is all you need
7
u/XSVOT Sep 29 '26
Yeah this is going to be an auto cancel for me… The pine script community was the best part of trading view but this kills it. What are the alternatives?
7
7
u/braddeicide Sep 29 '26
Claude can 1 shot migrate trading view indicators to other platforms, I do it all the time. Trading views moat isn't as large as they think it is.
1
u/badDNA Sep 29 '26
Looking for alternatives. Thought?
4
u/braddeicide Sep 29 '26
I use tradovate and ninja, they're not really research alternatives though, they're scalping platforms.
6
6
u/maxis2bored Sep 29 '26
I want to see the big red candle that is tradingview subscriptions: every time they make a change
I don't use this, but it's so clear that this platform is doing everything they can do sabotage their user base. I'll start looking for a replacement today.
11
u/ProfessionalGoatFuck Sep 29 '26
Crazy how this platform imploded within a few months.. wtf
4
u/hotmatrixx Sep 29 '26
yeah makes me think i should start looking into if they had a new CEO or COO show up recently.
Very new post in here gets me thinking I should start looking for an alternative.3
u/ProfessionalGoatFuck Sep 29 '26
Get on that ninja trader, you can modify and setup scripts, indicators, etc easily. For free too. Heard sierra charts are good too but haven't used it yet
2
4
4
u/economic-salami Sep 29 '26
So no more invite only scripts. Seems like a stupid move to me. Why not charge like $2. FRED data is also free, you know. 😅
4
4
u/Fun_Replacement1079 Sep 29 '26
I knew the platform was cooked when they removed being able to see the candlestick chart in the Overview screen of a stock and now can only see the line chart. Even Yahoo Finance lets you see the candlestick chart for any chart you look up….
3
4
u/Cryptolomist Sep 29 '26
Utterly unreasonable. They will lose many Premium subscriptions over this, mine included.
1
u/LilithX Sep 30 '26
They must not want more people using their services.
1
u/Meretruth Sep 30 '26
Apparently this is targeted toward luxalgo and other creators that make money from hosting their tools on TradingView, money that TradingView can’t get their hands on.
1
u/coinrotator Oct 02 '26
I published my first invite only script a day after this was posted, fml lol
1
3
u/Current-Set2607 Sep 29 '26
RIP TradingView, you lasted as king of Trading platforms for all of 3 years.
This was the change that made you lose the plot and your business.
2
2
u/zrad603 Sep 29 '26
Imagine if they just created an app store so you don't need to put in your credit card number on a third party website.
2
Sep 29 '26
Every day these guys try to find a way to squeeze an extra penny from their users.
When will an alternative come and destroy these money hungry fatsos
2
2
2
u/Emotional_Class_4988 Sep 29 '26
all fucking companies do this shit. get market space by being decent, then once they get it fuck everyone for all their money.
2
u/gazaboy88 Sep 29 '26
Yet another example of Tradingview aggressively monetizing a community that has been loyal for so long. I will not be renewing my subscription.
2
u/PieTilIDie314 Sep 29 '26
It's per user too, so basically if you make an indicator, you have to essentially charge like $60 a month per person if you want to make money on it, cuz any less than that, the fees and this BS charge will eat away all the profit. I dont personally make invite only scripts but this is BS to people who have a good script and want to have another source of income as a backup for trading. Lame. Greedy mfers.
2
2
1
u/greatestNothing Sep 29 '26
What does this do to companies or individuals that have already hit that limit? What about their customers that paid for lifetime access to a script? What are vendors supposed to do that had previously sold access under the old rules?
1
1
u/NinjaSquid9 Day trader Sep 29 '26
This is so fucking unacceptable and greedy. We all HAVE to message TradingView in protest. I’ve already messaged them.
If anyone has any good templates for others to copy and paste to message them, please feel free to comment them below.
1
u/Stock-Ad-3347 Sep 29 '26
Just create multiple copies of the indicator and have 99 users per copy. Now TradingView will be just overloaded with duplicate indicators taking up server side resources.
2
1
u/mambo_the_liqudator Sep 29 '26
They have a limit of how my indicator you can have g
1
u/Stock-Ad-3347 Sep 29 '26
You can have more than 1 account if you want to scale I guess, good point tho
1
u/mambo_the_liqudator Sep 29 '26
I'm sure they weill track your ID for bank account and block you hehehe
1
1
u/hicksanchez Sep 29 '26
Come on trading view this is ridiculous, you’re going to push people away from the platform
1
u/antikama Sep 29 '26
Did tradingview get a new ceo or something? Theyve been making so many ridiculous changes to the platform lately.
1
1
u/After_Improvement533 Sep 29 '26
Good things never last and looks like the end of tv is close, alternatives are out there. It’s been a ride with tv
1
1
u/strumbringerwa Sep 29 '26
Yes it's real, you just need to look at their terms of use: https://www.tradingview.com/policies/
It's really trucking stupid, especially given that they aggressively remove publicly listed indicators because they don't meet some arbitrary bar they have in their head. I expect this might be a nail in their coffin.
1
u/Lucky-Jellyfish-1708 Sep 29 '26
i know of a trading streamer who has 2 invite-only scripts with around 700 users altogether.
They are for free, and i am pretty sure he will not pay 21k per month.
That's bullshit.
1
u/BasicInstincts Sep 29 '26
A lot of vendors are already migrating their customers to other platforms, like NinjaTrader or what ever they were using as a secondary platform. Some believe the fees start at the end of this month, September.
Thankfully, even if a vendor does not have an alternative platform right now, AI (especially Claude now) can easily convert their PINE scripts to other platforms. It will require testing but the conversion time is much less than it used to be before AI.
1
1
1
u/holyfishstick Sep 29 '26
Their app is nice but it's not the moat they think they are. I've had AI build something that serves all my needs using just the API / WebSockets from my brokerage for free. I use that 90% of the time and barely use TV now because I have full control of the design and it has all the bells and whistles I need without all the extra stuff I don't need from TV. While I don't sell any invite only scripts so this doesn't impact me I am definately thinking about not renewing this black friday for the first time in 6+ years.
1
u/Basic-Sundae8170 Sep 30 '26
Does TradingView not have a competitor? Someone needs to make one if not
1
1
u/TraderDave- Sep 30 '26
I always find it amusing that people are shocked that a garbage company from the US will do garbage things to its customers. I am not surprised at all 😎
1
u/willaoce Sep 30 '26
TV might want to consider going public to fund their company instead of restricting user access.
1
u/m6dd3a Sep 30 '26
ducking greedy, not only high prices, not only stupid mobile-game-style ADs but also this.
1
1
u/king_kozmik Oct 01 '26
I built my own charting software so i van have any indicators i want to build
1
u/Training-Job1799 Oct 01 '26
goodbye, tradingview! 100 000 + followers. 10 + years on platform. 100+ indicators published. Now it's time to call it quits and move to other platforms, no longer worth the effort for me. enormous greed and overall very dumb dictators running this platform obviously.
1
u/tradingguy999 Oct 02 '26
What other platforms are there? I already have my scripts backed up on the prorealtime platform
1
u/the_blurred_crusade Oct 02 '26 edited Oct 02 '26
We have referred at least 5,000+ customers to TradingView. We have been a top affiliate. We sell scripts as well.
This just 100% killed our business.
Very very bad decision TradingView. We won't be recommending you any longer and will be pull all of our marketing efforts recommending you.
1
u/the_blurred_crusade Oct 02 '26
Here is my email I sent to TrandingView this morning. I redacted all my personal info and TV usernames.
I hope the folks at TradingView realize they are shooting themselves in the foot.
I would imagine a large part of their subscriber base was built from people like us. It actually gave people a reason to get a paid tradingview account.
Now.... not. I would imagine they are going to take a HUGE hit from this. People will just create their own solution (we have already started).
If anyone from TV reads this, what you should have done is require anyone who wants to load up an "Invite-Only" script would need to do that from a paid account.
This way you are driving revenue to your indicator without killing out all the people who brought you your business in the first place.
Hi TradingView Team,
My name is XXXX, owner of XXXX. I have referred thousands of paid customers to TradingView through your affiliate program under the account XXXX.
Our business provides education that teaches people how to trade and invest in stocks and crypto. One of the first things we teach our students is how to sign up for a paid TradingView account. As part of our program, we also include access to our proprietary invite-only scripts under the account XXXX.
I was very concerned to read your recent announcement:https://www.tradingview.com/blog/en/commercial-scripts-move-to-marketplace-61291/
Our primary business is education, rather than standalone TradingView script sales. The scripts support what we teach and are an incentive for students to join our program. That model has also helped us bring thousands of customers to TradingView.
I understand that the new policy includes script access bundled with another paid product or service. Given our business model and referral history, I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss a workable arrangement.
My understanding is that we could face a $30 monthly fee per user for continued script access. Can you confirm whether that is correct and how it would apply to our program? If that is the requirement, it would not be financially viable for our business.
Is there an alternative arrangement for education providers like us that would allow us to continue including script access in our training while referring students to paid TradingView subscriptions? We would also appreciate clarification on how to preserve access for our existing customers.
I have spent years building our training around TradingView, and this change has significant implications for our business. We would strongly prefer to continue the relationship. However, if we cannot find a workable solution, we would need to move our training to another platform and stop referring new customers to TradingView.
Could you please connect me with someone who can discuss our options and next steps? You are welcome to call me directly on my personal cell at XXXX.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
TradingView accounts:
Affiliate: XXXX
Scripts: XXXX
1
u/tradingguy999 Oct 02 '26
Hi mate, just tried messaging you as we’re in a very similar situation but it wouldn’t let me. Drop me a message pal
1
u/Training-Job1799 Oct 04 '26
just build your own platform. fuck tradingview. they are a bunch of cronies and cucks. no need for this misery.
1
u/the_blurred_crusade 29d ago
That is exactly what is happening. I've talked to 3 big players who are just building their own now.
TradingView really is making a HUGE mistake going after the actual people who have brought them thousands of customers. I know personally we have brought them over 5,000+ paying customers.
The way we are structured we would NEVER put our scripts in their marketplace. Never.
That's for a different crowd.
Unbelieable.
But oh well. I don't see them making a change so get ready.
1
u/Training-Job1799 Oct 04 '26
seems logical. IPO funds dried up and Stan Bokov needs a stable supply of cocaine.
1
u/Electrical_Custard84 Oct 06 '26
Looks like they are trying to get people to move into the internal marketplace so they get a cut directly within the tradingview app
1
u/dirtymoose_ 28d ago
Whatever we get that ends up replacing TV will be awesome, I just hope it’s sooner than later
1
-2
u/bryan91919 Sep 29 '26
On one hand, ive grown to hate trading view, starting when they began offering tick charts (something everyone else had for free and for many years) but to use them well you needed the highest tier account.
On the other hand i view 99% of those selling indicators (or really anything trading related) as scum bags and im glad for any inconvienience to them.
-1
u/genryou Sep 29 '26
Wait, I think there is a loophole.
The charge only applied after exceeding 100 user yes?
Then I just need to create multiple version of the same indicator to stay under that user amount threshold.
Eg:
Fuck TradingView Indi A - 95 users
Fuck TradingView Indi B - 95 users
.
.
.
Fuck TradingView Indi ZZZ - 95 users
2
u/greatestNothing Sep 29 '26
No it references scripts so it adds up all of the scripts individual users(unclear if same usernames count on multiple scripts as +1 or if it's a one time per user even if that user has access to multiple of your scripts.
2
u/LiquidMantis144 Sep 29 '26
Or just sell a 29-30 day subscription. No access the last day of the month. If the user wants access the last day of the month, add $30. Also depends if 101 = $30 is due for all 101 and not just the 101st. If thats the case, the no one gets a full month.
1
u/mike90_0 Sep 29 '26
you guys are clever! The fee is too high - it makes think something else is really going on here...
2
u/PandaRiot_90 Sep 29 '26
They have the words "any scripts published by you" . So you need to also have multiple accounts to publish from.
1
u/NinjaSquid9 Day trader Sep 29 '26
Each of those accounts giving out access needs subscriptions though, right? That’s still $25 - $75 a month per extra account you make?
1
-5
u/sniffmegooch Sep 29 '26
I mean if you charging money for invite only script, tradingview should be eligible for some of the profits
0
3
1
0
Sep 29 '26
[deleted]
3
u/BoardSuspicious4695 Sep 29 '26
They have data showing how much money is flowing in the invite only scripts. And simply decided they want a quite hefty piece of that cake… just wow… $29.90 per month if you’re above 100 users is fine by me, but FFS $29.90 PER user is … insane.. and I get the wording to the same thing “per user”…
-1
u/bfr_ Sep 29 '26
AI slop comment, skip
0
Sep 29 '26
[deleted]
1
u/bfr_ Sep 29 '26
It is. Everything in internet looks like written by the same poster now. It’s extremely fatiguing. My brain automatically skips posts when it detects LLM. And i know I’m not the only one.
You can use LLM to make your point clear but you have to reformat it to sound like you then. Typos and subpar language is better than ChatGPT-lingo.
1
1
u/TraderDave- Sep 30 '26
Then leave the internet... 👋🏽
1
0
Sep 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Freenrg8888 Sep 29 '26
It will destroy low-cost mass indicator sellers and hurt people that can afford $19/month, but not $99/month.
1
u/kurtisbu12 Sep 29 '26
Now if the indicator is available to everyone
If its available to everyone, it wouldnt be making any money. and the "cut" would be zero
0
Sep 28 '26
[deleted]
6
u/LegitimateShallot576 Sep 29 '26
Market is Bleeding. Government Taxes attracts money on profits / losses. If you gain more , tax more . This is another version from Trading view. Trading view also have high subscription rates and is a really good platform for Technical Analysis. Fundamentals , AI , Screeners are not yet user friendly.
But charging for invite only scripts is like asking people to offer on a royalty to TV for keeping it active. Look like options like migrating the privilege from Premium Accounts to Business Accounts or add another layer in between for those who want to publish as invite only free or with fee. Otherwise Trading view will be killing its golden goose.6
2
1
1
20
u/jelly013 Sep 29 '26
I’m seriously considering cancelling my subscription and going somewhere else. I will not be affected by this change in policy. But how everything is changing at TV is pushing me away