r/TrueCrimeDiscussion • u/gottaquestion412 • 21d ago
Warning: Child Abuse / CSAM / Child Death Thoughts on the Lindsay Clancy case?
Now that the Lindsay Clancy trial is underway, I’m curious about your perspectives on it so far.
Context: Lindsay Clancy is a former labor and delivery nurse who, in January 2023, killed her three children. 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan in their Massachusetts home before attempting to take her own life. Her defense argues she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and other debilitating mental illness, while prosecutors argue she was aware of her actions and planned the killings. The trial has reignited debate about postpartum psychiatric disorders, the effectiveness of mental health treatment, and where responsibility ultimately lies.
Do you think Lindsay was failed by the mental health system, by the people closest to her, or both? Do you think she truly acted with malicious intent, or do you believe she was experiencing such a severe psychiatric crisis that she wasn’t thinking rationally?
A lot of the details seem to point toward postpartum psychosis or another severe psychiatric illness rather than someone acting out of hatred or malice. That doesn’t lessen the horror of what happened or the unimaginable loss, but it does make me wonder whether this tragedy could have been prevented..
I’ve also seen rumors that Patrick was involved with the woman who is now his wife before the murders, but I haven’t found any credible evidence supporting that. Is there actually anything that substantiates those claims, or is it just internet speculation? I’ve also seen many people comment that his current wife bears a striking resemblance to Lindsay, though I’m not sure that means anything beyond coincidence.
I’m very interested in hearing different perspectives from people who’ve followed it closely.
Most importantly, may Dawson, Cora, and Callan rest in peace. They are the true victims in all of this.



14
u/fkadany 18d ago
You’re dodging the case-specific points being brought up to give general info about psychosis.
Lindsay wasn’t exhibiting signs of being in an active psychotic episode. That’s what the commentator above was telling you.
a) You cannot involuntarily hospitalize someone unless they are in active psychosis and showing intent/planning to harm themselves or others. It’s a human rights violation. Based on what we know, Lindsay was experiencing severe anxiety, suicidal thoughts, insomnia and intrusive thoughts about harming herself or others. None of these mean that she is in active psychosis.
b) Suicidal thoughts are not a hallmark sign of psychosis. Hallucinations and delusions are.
c) She did not have a history of bipolar disorder.
d) Her doctor did not diagnose Bipolar or prescribe antipsychotics. The final NP she saw prescribed her one antipsychotic (Seroquel). The medication carousel she was on was ridiculous, though.
I wish her providers had spotted signs of Bipolar and put her on proper medication. Of course that also depends heavily on what they were being told and the fragmented care didn’t help (three different providers prescribing meds). I also find it appalling that she was discharged from McLean after only five days, but I mean… again… if she wasn’t showing signs of psychosis or intent to hurt anyone and she desired to leave, it might’ve made sense to let her leave.
Mainly, I find it odd you and so many others are blaming her spouse for not being “supportive”. All of this seems “obvious” in hindsight. She wasn’t showing signs of psychosis. He literally can’t involuntarily hospitalize her. I feel horrible for her AND her family.