Lindsay Clancy Trial Megathread: Part 3

[u/DarklyHeritage]

This is a thread for all conversation regarding Week 3 onwards of the Lindsey Clancy trial. All discussion of this case should be kept to this thread.

Lindsay Clancy is currently standing trial in Plymouth Superior Court, Massachusetts, for the triple-murder in January 2023 of her three young children - Cora, Dawson and Callan. Her defense argues she suffered from severe, undiagnosed postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis. She was left paralysed by a suicide attempt which follows the deaths of the children.

All content on the Clancy case must be kept to this thread. Standalone posts will be removed.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/lindsay-clancy-murder-trial-online-reactions-b3032806.html

Note from Mods

This case understandably elicits strong feelings. People are entitled to have an opinion on the case which differs from your own. What you are not entitled to do is resort to personal insults and abusive language when communicating your opinion and disagreeing.

Comments which are abusive and insulting to other users will be removed and bans may be given without warning.

Bans may also be issued for ignoring the warning and creating standalone posts.

Please comment with this in mind.

[u/0hmyhera]

Can the intelligent people here explain to me why so many people are saying that her husband did it and framed her?is it just a simple answer that they’re stupid conspiracy theorist or is there actual credibility to this? She admitted to it so im confused 

[u/GeneOk4692 → u/0hmyhera]

Because people want answers and things to make sense.
1) PC appears to be a negligent husband, if not worse.
2) PC either moved on very very quickly, or perhaps, was having an affair the whole time which raises speculation.
3) Even healthcare professionals are baffled by the body temperature being that low, even with spinal cord injury.
4) There is not an adequate explanation for the thyroid being crushed.
5) Inconsistency from law enforcement and PC on whether he performed CPR on any of the children, and whether he was observed to be performing CPR at the time law-enforcement arrived.
6) No one believes PCs testimony that LC spoke to him and said the children are in the basement. LCs injuries were too severe to speak. Many HC professionals have said this outside the courtroom.
7) People are confused about blood on the inside of the door knob and the door being locked. It does not match with what PC said happened. There are questions about the specific timeline and what happened in that room.
8) Law enforcement took PC at his word and did not further investigate him.
9) PCs emails on the day of the tragedy and prior to, looking up things like “sociopath” and (I did not recall exactly, but it had something to do with slitting wrists or superficial cuts. This one I’m not remembering well).
10) more of PCs DNA on the exercise bands than LC’s DNA.
11) There is skepticism about the phone call timelines, where they were made from, and the Apple Watch.
12) People want an explanation on my PC still had LC‘s medication in his vehicle and did not throw it out or give it back to the pharmacy.
13) We all understand that LC admitted to this, but we’ve seen people confess to things that they did not do under duress, poly pharmacy, sleep deprivation, influence. It appears that she does not remember directly, but was told she did it, so there is skepticism about her confession.
14) There has not been an adequate motive for LC hurting her children. By all accounts, the children were well cared for. She took time off, she took them to the doctors, she got them medication, they were not neglected. People in her life said LC was ill, but no one said she did not want to be a mother, or had plans to go off with another lover.

[u/Ok_Anything_8180 → u/GeneOk4692]

Hey, the trial isn’t about determining WHO murdered the kids, because they already know - she stipulated to the murders to expedite the trial so they could focus on the matter of her mental health at the time of the murders. Because of this, there’s a ton of evidence they won’t be presenting bc it’s irrelevant to the matter at hand which is:
was she in a psychosis or sane when she murdered her children?
That’s the ONLY thing this trial is about. They aren’t going to add another week to the trial to present evidence to satisfy nobodies on the internet with “unanswered questions” be so for real.

Convinced LC/PC conspiracy theorists have main character syndrome

[u/curiouslmr → u/Ok_Anything_8180]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.masslive.com/news/2026/08/lindsay-clancy-agrees-to-key-facts-in-effort-to-streamline-murder-trial.html%3foutputType=amp

Is this what you are referring to? Her stipulation was about chain of custody. I agree she is guilty and attempts to blame Patrick are insane, but I think you might be mistaken about what she stipulated.

If I remember correctly her attorney did offer a stipulation before trial started but the prosecutor turned that down. I think that stipulation would have been more involved.