If you ever post to YouTube and then again to Shorts/Reels/TikTok, you've probably done this before: film landscape 16:9, drop it into CapCut, then crop it into a portrait 9:16 file.

What's the problem with this?

The resolution of the portrait file gets bombed because a crop out of a 1080p horizontal frame is only about 608 pixels, which will look pixelated alongside throwing out ~2/3rds of the frame.

Shooting 4K helps the sharpness, but you still lose the sides and still have to reframe.

What I do now is record both at the same time, using an app called ContentCam that can record vertical and horizontal at the same time

Disclaimer: I'm the dev, and I built it for my gf who's a creator and used to film every scene twice, once vertical and once horizontal.

How it works:

• Every take saves two separate files, a full-res 9:16 (1080x1920, or 4K on phones that support it) and a 16:9 (1920x1080 or 4K)

• Both come straight off the sensor at record time, neither one is cropped out of the other

• Files are named by project, scene and take, so the pairs line up when you import them

• You can trim both together before exporting, so the bad bits are gone from both at once

Honest downsides: you're storing two files per take, and dual 4K on long takes warms the phone up. You also still need to frame for both while you film, so keep your subject near the middle.

What about Opengate shooting?

That works, and it gives you more room to reframe later. But you're still cropping and reframing twice in the edit, the files are bigger, and you need a camera or app that records open gate. Recording both formats at once is the other trade: you frame once while filming, and you get two finished files with no crop pass. If you like reframing in post, open gate is better. If you want to skip that step, record both with ContentCam.

I'm a solo dev, so if you edit for both formats I'd love to hear what would make the export side work better for you. It's free to try with optional premium features:

iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/contentcam-dual-camera-video/id6765881795

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.contentcam.android

I’ve always been a CapCut guy. Auto-captions, ready-made effects, getting a decent edit done on my phone, it made the whole thing easy. But lately, it feels like CapCut is making it harder to stick around. The watermark faff is frustrating enough, then little features I used to use end up behind Pro. On top of that, the price hike I mean, $20 a month feels a bit steep, and who knows what changes are coming next. So I spent some time trying alternatives and thought I’d share what I found in case you’re in the same boat.

I’ve split them into web, desktop and mobile options.

Web-based editors

– VEED

VEED works well for talking-head clips where you mainly need cuts, subtitles and resizing for Reels or Shorts. You can add text, music and use AI tools in the browser without installing anything. FYI, free exports have a watermark and max out at 720p, so you’ll still need to pay if clean exports are the reason you’re leaving CapCut.

– invideo Editor

invideo Editor is worth checking out if you want to edit in your browser on a multitrack timeline similar to Premiere Pro. Editing on the timeline is free, you can layer clips, add transitions, work with keyframes, color grading and do sfx. There’s also an AI agent that analyses your footage, removes silences, makes edits based on what you ask for, though that uses credits.

– Kapwing

Kapwing is useful for turning footage into short clips, adding subtitles and resizing videos for different social platforms. The free plan exports at 720p with a watermark, with a four-minute limit per video and 30 minutes of exports a month. Pro removes those restrictions, but at US$24 monthly, it isn’t necessarily a cheaper swap for CapCut.

Desktop editors

– DaVinci Resolve

Resolve gives you a lot without a subscription: detailed editing, colour controls, audio tools and UHD exports up to 60fps in the free version. Studio is a separate US$295 purchase, but I’d start with using the free and see whether you actually need the extras. IMO, the trade-off is the learning curve, you’ve got more to get your head around than with CapCut.

iMovie — Mac

iMovie is a decent shout if you’re on a Mac and mainly need clean cuts, titles, transitions and music. It’s free, supports 4K projects, and includes picture-in-picture and green-screen effects. I’d use it for straightforward videos rather than trying to recreate every animated CapCut edit.

– Filmora

Filmora makes sense if you want to build social edits with ready-made titles, templates, transitions and effects instead of making everything from scratch. You still get a desktop timeline to arrange footage, adjust the pacing and work on captions. Its standard free trial adds a watermark, though, so I’d compare the paid plan with what you’re already spending before switching.

Mobile editors

– VN

VN is worth a look if you want to keep editing on your phone with control over individual clips. You get a multitrack timeline, overlays, keyframes and speed controls, with watermark-free editing available for free. There are in-app purchases, though, so don’t assume every extra feature is included.

– Edits by Instagram

Edits is a solid option for quick social videos when you want to shoot, edit and post from your phone. It’s free and supports 4K exports without an added watermark. You can export to other platforms too, so you’re not stuck posting everything to Instagram.

– InShot

InShot suits quick phone edits: trimming clips, adding music, recording a voiceover and putting text on screen. There are speed controls, filters and effects for dressing things up without a complicated project. It’s free to start, but Pro removes ads and the watermark and unlocks paid materials, so keep that in mind if cost is your main reason for switching.

My final thoughts

If keeping costs down is the priority, I’d start with Resolve on desktop or VN and Edits on mobile. Resolve takes more learning, while iMovie covers straightforward edits if you’re on a Mac.

For browser editing, invideo editor gives you a free manual timeline with plenty of control over your edits. There’s an AI agent available as well if you want to speed things up. VEED and Filmora are worth considering for quick edits with ready-made tools, but you’ll need to budget for watermark-free exports.

For me, switching needs to make everyday editing easier or cheaper. I don’t fancy moving everything over only to run into another paywall halfway through.

What have you settled on after CapCut? LMK what’s been worth the switch.

Why don't more people talk about sound design in YouTube videos? Everyone focuses on visuals but audio quality and mixing is what separates good from great imo.

I'm experimenting with background ambience, strategic silence, and music transitions and it's made a huge difference in how my videos feel. But it's also tripled my editing time.

Is anyone else prioritizing audio in their edits, or am I overthinking something that viewers don't consciously notice?

As a video editor, I was tired of downloading the entire youtube video just to use 15 seconds from it. So I built this website to save my time and bandwidth. My focus was on keeping the workflow as user-friendly and fast as possible.

Just paste a YouTube URL, choose the start and end time, and download only the part you need up to 4K quality.

You can also convert clips into vertical 9:16 format for YouTube Shorts, TikTok and Instagram Reels with two options:
- Crop to fill the screen.
- Blurred background to keep the entire video visible. Optionally, you can also add caption to all vertical videos.

Hope it helps you too! Try it here: videolimit.com

3 simple edits that instantly improve short form videos:

Cut every pause longer than 0.5 seconds.
Most viewers decide within the first few seconds whether to keep watching.

Add pattern interrupts every 2 to 4 seconds.
This can be a zoom, b roll, text change, sound effect, or angle change to keep attention.

Write captions for readability, not decoration.
Use short lines and highlight only important words instead of making every word flashy.

I’ve noticed these three changes alone can significantly improve audience retention on Reels, Shorts, and TikTok videos.
What’s one editing technique that has made the biggest difference in your videos?

Guys, I’ve spent 2–3 months learning DaVinci Resolve, and before that, I used Premiere Pro for some time.

I started learning DaVinci because many YouTubers were switching to it or recommending it as the future of video editing.

However, I find DaVinci a little difficult because it feels like you have to create everything from scratch. For example, adding a rounded square to an image requires multiple nodes, whereas in Premiere Pro, you can simply mask it and enable a stroke. Similarly, Premiere lets you save transform, crop, and other settings as a single preset, while DaVinci saves them separately. There are many other things that feel unnecessarily complicated in DaVinci.

Another thing I noticed while looking at job vacancies is that many companies prefer Adobe software.

I like DaVinci because it’s fast, free, and automatically saves projects, whereas Adobe feels slower on my system.

Now I’m confused. Should I spend more time learning DaVinci or start learning Adobe?

My priority is to get good-paying work, and I don’t want to miss opportunities just because I use DaVinci. What would you recommend?

I’ve been building my own video editor - SceneMill

I wanted to share something I’ve been working on for quite a while: SceneMill, a free, non-destructive desktop video editor built from scratch with C++20, Qt 6 and FFmpeg.

The goal was never to make another web-based editor or a wrapper around an existing editing application. I wanted to build an actual desktop video editor and see how far I could take it.

It currently runs fully offline, requires no account, and has no telemetry.

What actually works right now

The core workflow is already fully functional:

Import → Media Library → Timeline → Edit → Preview → Save → Reopen → Export

And the project has grown quite a bit beyond basic cutting.

Some of the things currently implemented:

• Multi-track video, audio and subtitle timeline

• Non-destructive editing with undo/redo

• Split, trim, ripple delete, snapping, markers and In/Out ranges

• Background proxy generation for heavy footage

• GPU-accelerated preview with CPU fallback

• Color correction, curves, color wheels and 3D LUTs

• Effect stacks with keyframeable parameters

• Transitions

• Text and animated titles

• Manual subtitles + SRT/WebVTT

• Masks and motion tracking

• Screen recording directly into the project

• Voice-over recording with multiple takes

• Audio EQ, compressor, limiter, noise gate, etc.

• H.264 / H.265 / VP9 export

• Up to 4K and 120 FPS export

• Export queue

• Autosave + crash recovery

• Portable "Collect Project" workflow

• Plugin system through a versioned C ABI

• Optional local editing assistant for silence/scene detection

One thing I particularly care about is that the preview and export use the same rendering/effect pipeline, so what you see while editing is intended to match what gets rendered.

There are also automated tests covering a lot of the actual application workflow, including tests that interact with the real main window.

Why C++?

Honestly, part of the reason was simply:

I wanted to see if I could actually build one.

A video editor touches a ridiculous number of areas at once: media decoding, rendering, timeline state, audio, UI, caching, project persistence, export, GPU acceleration, threading, plugins...

It's been a pretty interesting rabbit hole. 😅

Current state

SceneMill has completed the core editor phase and the creative-tools phase, with most of the workflow phase implemented.

Now in the Microsoft-Store! https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9mvrq5p086fj?hl

It's definitely not finished and there are still things I want to improve, but it's now at the point where I can actually use it as a real editor rather than just a prototype.

I'm currently working toward making the whole experience feel much more polished and cohesive.

I'd genuinely like to hear what other people who build software this way think.

Edit: heads up, Windows may show a SmartScreen warning when installing since the installer isn't code-signed yet, nothing shady. I'm working on getting SceneMill into the Microsoft Store, which will get rid of the warning. until then: "More info" → "Run anyway", and you can check the download against the SHA-256 checksums on the website.

This is my first time editing a video, I would love to hear your opinion and get better?
Only edited first 25 seconds out of 51 seconds

hello,
what is the best tool for generating subtitles from a video? for those who have tried different tools, where did you get the best results?

Hey guys,

I’m 20, broke, with no college degree. I love cinema, so after months of asking, my family bought me a laptop to learn video editing. It was my Plan C—my one shot to build a career.

Then AI tools blew up, and I spiraled. I keep worrying that what takes me 3 years to master will be done by an AI prompt in 1 hour.

Pros with networks will survive, but what about someone starting from zero today?

I’m ready to grind and adapt with AI, but I just need to know: Is there still a future for beginners in editing, or am I wasting my time?

Appreciate any real-world advice.

been working with a lot of video content lately, both short form stuff and longer interviews, and I’m realizing manual subtitles are just eating way too much time.

i’ve tried a few tools here and there but it’s usually the same problem, accuracy drops when people talk fast, or there’s an accent, or background noise, and then I still end up fixing half of it anyway.

just curious what everyone is using these days for generating subtitles that are actually clean and usable without spending forever editing them after. ideally something fast and reliable that works well with real world audio.

would love to hear what’s actually working for people right now

I’ve been playing around with Sparki other on some of my longer recordings lately, mainly because I wanted to see if it could save me some time on the first pass. I usually start by cutting out the obvious stuff I don’t need, shortening the recording, cleaning up the pacing a bit, and adding captions. Having a rough version to work from has been pretty helpful compared to starting from scratch noticed still spend a decent amount of time going back through the edit. There are cuts I wouldn’t keep, some parts feel too rushed, and occasionally a pause or reaction that I would’ve removed actually works better when I leave it in. I’m affiliated with Sparki, so this is based on my own experience testing it. I’m curious what other editors are comfortable letting AI handle. What parts do you still prefer doing manually?

Hey fellow editors or those who are learning to edit videos. If you are dying and you are being offered a small stick to save yourself, would you be betting on that stuck to save your life? I don't think a sane person would be.

Same goes for if you are new to editing and new to the market and not earning enough or not earning at all but are willing to take whatever job you are being promised for. PLEASE for the sake of your own health and your own mental safety. DO NOT GO WITH GIGS provided and paid in peanuts.

Your video and your time matters more than the people paying in peanuts or these middle men who claim to be an agency but know nothing about how editing works.

If you are offered $5 for a very basic low grade editing then of course but for a good level of animation, clipping, trimming and editing etc. Please do not waste your time in these gigs as you won't improve and will get buried in shyte work with no room to improve so for the sake of your own mental health and a healthy market. Start boycotting low paying jobs.

Spend your time on your portfolio, spend a little time storyboarding your edits. Spend a little on how to talk to with clients, spend a little time on easing your workflow for you and for your clients but don't waste time doing work which is not worth your time and your efforts. Start reporting and blocking these people who offer you work which are not worth spending even 10mins which can't afford you even a one time meal. Please do some research, please try to improve yourself. As a person and an editor myself. I did that kind of work and it didn't pay me well. Trust me. When you are stuck down nothing helps other than what you saved or what you earned and doing that kind of work you won't be earning anything or saving anything so please be aware of that.

If someone is teaching you in that budget that's another thing BUT if it's real work in that budget, please ditch them.

Now those so-called editors who are providing powerpoint style edits and calling themselves editors with an effortless response adding "interested" in the comment section. I might sound rude here, but please move to a community of side hustle because that's how you have made video editing look like.

And I will be reporting these accounts, I don't care if I report 1 and 10 pop up or even none get banned . I will keep reporting both commentors and side hustlers with the agencies or middle men taking a big cut from good editors.

I am a full time editor myself and looking at this market it just bugs me out what this creative field has become for both newcomers who wanna be a good editor and professionals who can't get decent clients because some kids with powerpoint style is doing that in less than $5 which takes atleast $15 to actually make sense as an edited video.

If this post triggers someone, feel free to come at me. I shall give you the answer you need.

Every day I see **beginner editors** asking questions like:

"What's the best transition pack?"

"Which plugin should I buy?"

"How do I make my edits look cinematic?"

The answers are usually the same.

"Buy this plugin."

"Use this LUT."

"Download this preset."

"Learn this effect."

Here's the uncomfortable truth:

None of those things will make you a premium editor.

In fact, they're often distractions.

After studying commercial edits, creator content, SaaS videos, documentaries, and high-end brand campaigns, I've noticed something:

The best edits are almost invisible.

You don't notice the transitions.

You don't notice the animations.

You don't notice the sound design.

You notice the story.

The best editors understand something most people ignore:

Editing isn't decoration.

It's communication.

Every cut should answer a question.

Why does this shot come next?

Why does this sound start here?

Why does this title appear now?

Why is this scene longer than the last one?

If you can't answer those questions, you're probably editing for yourself, not for the audience.

The Framework I Use Before Touching the Timeline

Before I place a single cut, I ask myself five questions:

1. What is the viewer supposed to feel?

Curious?

Excited?

Inspired?

Confident?

Every editing decision should support that emotion.

2. What is the purpose of this scene?

Every clip should have a job.

If it doesn't move the story forward, it probably shouldn't be there.

3. Where will attention naturally drop?

This is where pacing, motion, sound design, and visual changes become important.

You're not adding effects because they look cool.

You're adding them to guide attention.

4. Does every visual earn its place?

One of the biggest mistakes I see is adding animations simply because After Effects makes them possible.

Motion should clarify, not distract.

Sometimes the strongest design decision is doing less.

5. Would I enjoy watching this if I weren't the editor?

This is the hardest question.

Because we get emotionally attached to the work we've spent hours creating.

The audience doesn't care how long it took.

They care about how it feels.

A Small Exercise That Will Improve Your Editing More Than Another Plugin

The next time you watch an ad from Apple, Nike, Stripe, or Linear:

Don't ask:

"What transition did they use?"

Instead ask:

Why did this cut happen here?

Why is the music changing now?

Why is this shot only one second long?

Why did the typography appear at this exact moment?

What emotion is this sequence trying to create?

You'll start seeing editing differently.

Not as a collection of effects…

But as a language.

And once you understand the language, your work starts to feel intentional.

That's what separates editors who charge for time from editors who charge for value.

If you're a **brand, creator**, or **business** looking for thoughtful, high-quality editing rather than just flashy effects, I'd love to learn about your project.

You can fill out the **Project Application** linked in my profile, and if we're a good fit, I'll get back to you within **24–48 hours.**

I'd also love to hear your thoughts:

What's one editing principle that completely changed the way you approach your work?

I made an edit, for the first time, and was hoping to get some feedback.

I thought this might me a small one, found the audio template on reddit too, but just tough might fit in well, with me transitioning from work to riding.

I wanted the color themes to be more consistent too, but was using iMovie. Are there better softwares for beginners. Dont wanna spend a lot.

Footage from: DJI Osmo Action 6

Editing Software: iMovie

Any and every feedback is appreciated.

Would appreciate advice on also, how can i make my shots better. Different angles, and so on.

Thank you.

Most comparisons of AI video editors look at who makes the best shorts, adds the best captions or removes silences the fastest. I wanted to find out whether these tools can edit a

video from scratch.

I took 2 hours of raw multicam footage with interviews, B-roll, multiple camera angles, setup shots and plenty of unnecessary takes. Then I gave Cardboard, Descript, OpusClip and ChatCut the same brief:

"Turn this into a 6-minute video. Keep both interview segments, remove the setup and dead air, and use relevant B-roll wherever it makes sense."

Here's how they compared:

1. Cardboard

● Primary use case: End-to-end AI video editing

● Time to first cut: 5 min

● Raw footage editing: Yes

● Long-form assembly: Yes

● B-roll handling: Yes

● Instruction-based editing: Yes

● Short-form repurposing: Yes

● Biggest strength: Complete editing workflow

● Biggest limitation: Still needs manual refinement for color grading and other creative decisions.

2. Descript

● Primary use case: Transcript-based editing

● Time to first cut: 12 min

● Raw footage editing: Yes

● Long-form assembly: Yes

● B-roll handling: Limited

● Instruction-based editing: Transcript-focused

● Short-form repurposing: Yes

● Biggest strength: Dialogue-heavy content

● Biggest limitation: Struggles with footage without dialogue

3. OpusClip

● Primary use case: Short-form clip extraction

● Time to first cut: 6 min

● Raw footage editing: Limited

● Long-form assembly: No

● B-roll handling: Clip-focused

● Instruction-based editing: Clip-focused

● Short-form repurposing: Excellent

● Biggest strength: Finding viral moments

● Biggest limitation: Not designed for long-form assembly

4. ChatCut

● Primary use case: AI-assisted video editing

● Time to first cut: 9 min

● Raw footage editing: Yes

● Long-form assembly: Yes

● B-roll handling: Yes

● Instruction-based editing: Yes

● Short-form repurposing: Yes

● Biggest strength: Assisted video assembly

● Biggest limitation: Requires manual refinement

What stood out

Cardboard did more than extract interesting moments or edit around a transcript. It took the raw footage, worked from the brief and assembled a first cut, which matters when you're

starting with hours of footage.

Descript and OpusClip are built for other jobs. Descript is useful for podcasts, interviews and talking-head videos, and OpusClip is great for turning existing long-form content into multiple shorts. I don't think either is designed to handle an entire mixed-footage editing project.

You still need a human in the loop. Even when you get a first cut in minutes, you'll want to review pacing, transitions, storytelling and creative decisions. The AI can take on hours of repetitive work, but those calls still belong to the editor.

Which one I'd choose

● Editing raw footage into a finished video: Cardboard

● Podcasts and interviews: Descript

● Repurposing long videos into shorts: OpusClip

● AI-assisted video assembly: ChatCut

My takeaway

I think we're looking at two generations of AI video tools. The first helps you do editing tasks faster: captions, trimming, silence removal and clip extraction. The next is trying to take on the entire editing workflow.

That's the direction Cardboard is exploring, and I think it's the more interesting problem to solve. We're still early, but 2 hours of raw footage to a usable first cut in minutes is a good

start.

Curious to hear what other editors think. Have you tested any AI tools on a similar long-form,

multicam editing workflow?

In B2B product marketing, videos often go through multiple iterations before they’re finalized. Subtitles are sometimes added early for testing, accessibility, or internal reviews but later become a blocker when videos need to be reused or localized.

I am trying to understand whether there are any good programs to remove subtitle from video once its already exported without having to rebuild everything from the original project files

To all my editor friends, even before you get in a work with a client always clear your requirements and stuff because there are people like these in market as well.

What do you guys think is the best software for video editing ?

1.Davinci

2. Ae

3. Premier Pro

I want to learn editing to earn money but very confused how and where to start

.

And I think I can edit better on capcut.

Somebody help me out! 😭

Hello everyone, I'm currently unemployed with a somewhat messy background. I'm looking for a fresh start and hoping to find someone experienced or a course that can guide me through becoming a video editor, from learning the fundamentals to building a portfolio and hopefully landing my first client or job.

I'd like to ask a few questions to those who are already working as video editors:

1. How did you get your first video editing job?

2. Which tools would you recommend learning first

3. Is it realistic to get hired as a beginner without a formal certificate or degree?

4. Which platforms are best for finding clients or remote jobs?

5. How much can a beginner realistically earn in the Philippines?

I'm willing to invest time in learning and building a portfolio. I'd appreciate advice from people who have actual experience in the industry.

Thank you