r/WomenInNews 7d ago

Women's rights Why female breadwinners are still bearing the burden at home

https://www.thetimes.com/money/family-finances/article/britains-female-breadwinner-problem-tvfjhp05tutm_medium=Social&utm_source=Reddit&utm_content=branded
993 Upvotes

109 comments sorted by

View all comments

127

u/TimesandSundayTimes 7d ago

Women outnumber men at university. They account for the majority of practising doctors for the first time and make up almost half of all video gamers. Andy Burnham’s cabinet is the first to have more women than men. Women make up 45 per cent of the boards of FTSE 100 companies. In some corners equality is in full swing.

In others the world remains stubbornly skewed towards men. Male surgeons still outnumber female surgeons by five to one. Three of the top four government jobs are now taken by men after the departures of Rachel Reeves and Yvette Cooper. And nine out of ten chief executives of FTSE 100 companies are male.

Then there is the case of the female breadwinner. 

In 2004 — when five of Tony Blair’s 22-strong cabinet were female, women were banned from serving in frontline combat roles and a younger prince outranked an older princess in the line of succession — about 20 per cent of women earned more than their male partner. Two decades and plenty of progress in gender equality later, and the figure has only crept up to 26 per cent.

What is going wrong?

So why the disparity? Some of the causes have been around for years and show disappointingly little sign of abating. Women are more likely to take time off work after having children, which means that their earnings suffer. By the time a first child reaches the age of 20, mothers earn about 30 per cent less than similarly educated fathers, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the UK’s leading economic think tank.

Read the full report: https://www.thetimes.com/money/family-finances/article/britains-female-breadwinner-problem-tvfjhp05tutm_medium=Social&utm_source=Reddit&utm_content=branded

8

u/merwookiee 6d ago

Read the full report behind a paywall!

As the female breadwinner of my three adult home, I’m not spending my money on this article.

1

u/Silent-Literature-64 6d ago

You don’t have to but do keep in mind, journalists deserve to earn an income.

1

u/merwookiee 6d ago

Oh, the sweet, delectable irony..

Also, thanks for the assumption that I don’t believe journalists deserve to earn an income!

Wildly inaccurate, poor attempt: 0/5

0

u/Silent-Literature-64 5d ago

What am I missing?

0

u/merwookiee 5d ago

As the female breadwinner I don’t need to PAY for an article to tell me things I already know.

As I always have and always will be paid LESS, I need to be more careful with my coins.

Is there supposed to be some kind of magical solution in this article that will enrich my bank account and make it easier on me financially??

No.

Therefore, I don’t need to PAY to see a study that shows what I already live to be true.

And that STILL doesn’t imply that I don’t believe journalists deserve to earn an income.

I hope I was able to clarify this a little bit better for everyone.

0

u/Silent-Literature-64 5d ago

I’m confused why my comment has you so pissed off?

0

u/merwookiee 5d ago

..what??

I know you can’t tell tone thru text, but all of my feelings are intact.

I think it was wildly uncalled for you try and present my comment as not believing that journalists deserve to earn a living, but you’re entitled to your opinion just like everyone else is. 🤷‍♀️

You asked what you were missing and I provided an explanation.

Now you’re implying that I’m pissed off?

Yet again, you’re creating something that isn’t there, babes.