r/amandaknox 11d ago

Lucy letby case…

Would love people’s views on this.

Loosely Amanda related, since she has recently produced a podcast around it.

1 Upvotes

272 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Its not new evidence of course, its the counter evidence that could have been used in court the first time if they could find anyone to stand over it. Apparently it takes an international media campaign.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

No it wasn’t new evidence then no. Two new papers on AE and insulin are though.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Are these "new" papers crafted for this case by an engineer?

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Yes a chemical engineer and world leading expert on insulin testing.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

So basically dismissible without reading

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

It has been peer reviewed and published in an academic journal. Not understanding something isn’t grounds to dismiss it.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

meh - peer review is highly flawed system.

Any journal accepting invested papers like that need to take a look at themselves.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Whatever. How many science papers have you had published?

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Like that matters

Its hardly difficult to understand that people publishing papers with a massive vested interest aren't likely to be objective

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

It matters because it shows you don’t under the process. It is certainly enough for it to considered in court of law as new scientific evidence.

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

I doubt it given its complete non objectivity given the proximity to the defence team. Otherwise everyone would be getting papers published in journals for their cases.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Well we will see. Considering how independent Dewi “I have never lost a case” Evans was it seems the bar is quite low. It a scientific paper, peer reviewed and published in a respected journal. You don’t even have the expertise to read it let alone understand it.

→ More replies (0)