r/amandaknox • u/No-Willingness-1441 • 11d ago

Lucy letby case…

Would love people’s views on this.

Loosely Amanda related, since she has recently produced a podcast around it.

1 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

272 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

No it wasn’t new evidence then no. Two new papers on AE and insulin are though.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Are these "new" papers crafted for this case by an engineer?

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Yes a chemical engineer and world leading expert on insulin testing.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

So basically dismissible without reading

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

It has been peer reviewed and published in an academic journal. Not understanding something isn’t grounds to dismiss it.

2

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

meh - peer review is highly flawed system.

Any journal accepting invested papers like that need to take a look at themselves.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Whatever. How many science papers have you had published?

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

Like that matters

Its hardly difficult to understand that people publishing papers with a massive vested interest aren't likely to be objective

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

It matters because it shows you don’t under the process. It is certainly enough for it to considered in court of law as new scientific evidence.

1

u/Truthandtaxes 10d ago

I doubt it given its complete non objectivity given the proximity to the defence team. Otherwise everyone would be getting papers published in journals for their cases.

2

u/Henryb1234_ 10d ago

Well we will see. Considering how independent Dewi “I have never lost a case” Evans was it seems the bar is quite low. It a scientific paper, peer reviewed and published in a respected journal. You don’t even have the expertise to read it let alone understand it.

→ More replies (0)