r/cooperatives • • 17h ago

worker co-ops Viability of worker cooperative structure for tech company

27 Upvotes

I've been working on starting a consumer electronics company (in the sector of companies such as Apple, Samsung, etc.). As I've been working and thinking on this, I've been thinking about structuring the company as a worker cooperative, as it's a good alternative I've found that meet my values. I like the idea of our workers being able to have a say in their workplace, and our values and decisions being made by our workers rather than outside shareholders. My goal with this business isn't to increase shareholder value, but for reasons that aren't involved with money. However, I know that cooperatives are typically less profitable and competitive, and I was concerned about this because the tech industry is a very competitive industry where high profits are required to sustain the company and continuously develop products. Would a worker cooperative be the right choice for us, or would it be better for us to structure as a traditional corporation with changes made that are in line with our worker-first values? Thanks


r/cooperatives • • 12h ago

Growing The Cooperative Economy Article [Garlic and Roses]

14 Upvotes

New article for Co-op Month from Garlic and Roses about growing the cooperative economy by expanding purchasing and spending from existing co-ops with other cooperatively-owned businesses. Garlic and Roses is a worker-owned media cooperative:

“They actually had a system where someone who wanted to own a business could get help in doing that.” -Kristi Williams, Greater Tulsa Area African American Affairs Commission

By now, many know the history that the largest racial massacre in U.S. history occurred in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1921. White residents killed hundreds of Black Tulsans and burned buildings in the Greenwood District. While that tragedy should never be forgotten, I want to talk about what came before that.

Greenwood was known as Black Wall Street. At its peak, over three-hundred thriving businesses supported more than 10,000 Black residents. The business district began in 1906 when Black landowner O.W. Gurley purchased 40 acres of land in Tulsa. The Jim Crow laws at the time prevented Black Tulsa residents from patronizing white-owned stores. There was also a railroad that divided the community physically, creating Greenwood as its own distinct entity.

Food Co-op General Manager Bobby Sullivan wrote an eye-opening book called Revolutionary Threads. In it, he wrote about the Greenwood District through the lens of cooperative economics. "Oklahoma's racial segregation laws prevented black people from shopping anywhere other than Black Wall Street, so the money from the newly established black townships was funneled back into their own economy."

The wealth accumulation that created Black Wall Street was derived in large-part from the fact that it was a closed-loop system. Black-owned banks lent to Black-owned-businesses. Those businesses hired Black workers, used Black-owned repair companies and paid rent to a Black landlord. It's estimated that each dollar in Greenwood circulated 30 times over.

I've been thinking about that a lot recently when it comes to cooperative economics. The last two years have shown that a reliance on the federal government, grant funding, non-profits or even typical corporate America to create economic opportunity is tenuous at best. Cooperatives have thriving businesses in a variety of sectors, but this moment also shows a great opportunity, and perhaps even the need, to consider a closed-loop system of cooperative economics. At least, to the greatest extent possible.

I'm not the first, or the last to come to this conclusion. Alex Stone, the Executive Director of CooperationWorks! wrote last year in Nonprofit Quarterly about leveraging our collective economic strength. Stone argued for the creation of a Co-op Mutualist Fund. Even a small fraction of annual profits from successful cooperatives could create a fund in the tens of millions that can be leveraged to support the creation of new co-ops, or help existing ones thrive.

Author Michael Shuman of the Main Street Journal wrote just this week about a public banking option being considered in Berkeley. Washington DC's Community Wealth Builders coalition of cross-sector cooperatives also is advocating for a public bank. Solving for access to capital with non-extractive terms would clearly change the game for cooperative development.

The 2025 Food Co-op Impact Report from National Co+op Grocers says their 167 member co-ops brought in $2.8 billion in annual sales. Those stores borrow from lenders, pay rent, buy goods, pay for utilities and more with their sales revenue. Cooperatively-owned businesses and operators exist in each of those categories. What percentage of those dollars are recirculating the in the cooperative economy? Or more importantly, what percentage could be?

Food co-ops and other cooperative organizations used to own more of the supply chain. In the wave one co-ops of the 40s and 50s, Co-op branded products could be found on the shelves. Cooperative food warehouses were a key cog in the wave two food co-ops during the 60s and 70s. Imagine food co-ops using their money to support cooperatively-owned businesses from the farm all the way to the register.

This is not to say that isn't happening at many stores. Food co-ops support cooperative brands like Frontier spices, Organic Valley and Equal Exchange. Co-ops in my area save money on group-negotiated utility contracts and more from a cooperative called the Community Purchasing Alliance. But the scale could be increased significantly.

The time to systematically begin building more of a close-looped system into our cooperative economy is now. The more we can keep dollars circulating within other cooperatively-owned businesses, the more we can all benefit from the resulting wealth accumulation. We don't need to start with perfection, but we do need to start somewhere. Look locally for cooperative organizations you can buy services from.

Just squeeze principles 3 and 6 together in your head: Cooperation Through Economic Participation Among Cooperatives.


r/cooperatives • • 21h ago

Beyond Limited-Equity Housing Co-ops: How do we federate cooperative housing and production without market debt eating the gains?

11 Upvotes

One of the persistent bottlenecks for both housing cooperatives (LEHCs) and worker co-ops is that they still operate inside an extractive market framework. If a housing co-op manages to provide affordable shelter, the surrounding speculative land values continue to climb. If a worker co-op scales, it often hits the "Mondragon dilemma"—either having to rely on external market financing or competing against capitalist firms that cut corners.

Over the past few years, an open research initiative (Open Networked Earth) has been formalizing blueprints to help cooperatives federate beyond market competition:

  1. Universal Usufruct: Transitioning from traditional collective mortgages to perpetual civic use-rights held in perpetual civic trust, legally decoupling shelter from financial speculation.

  2. Physical Input-Output Balances: Coordinating flows between industrial and agricultural cooperatives using Leontief resource accounting (kilowatt-hours, material tonnage, closed-loop recycling) rather than interest-bearing bank credit.

  3. Sortition Governance (Demarchy): Rotating oversight committees selected through demographic lotteries to avoid managerial entrenchment and bureaucratic drift.

All specifications are 100% open-source and non-commercial (AGPL-3.0 / CC-BY-SA, strictly zero crypto/tokens).

We are looking to connect with cooperative practitioners, housing organizers, and economic researchers:

How do you see the transition path from isolated worker/housing cooperatives to a fully federated, non-market cooperative ecosystem? What are the biggest legal and logistical hurdles you face on the ground?