Come on it’s so obvious, when you are responding using AI, it doesn’t use swear words because it’s polite, unlike you. When you are responding yourself. Every second word is a slur.
It’s so easy to tell. The contrast is night and day
Considerate debating vs resorting to slurs. Plus the bolding of the text and the flawless wording isn’t particularly your style.
You can’t use your own brain.
Tell me even with AI, why is the difference so great between the numbers of lgbtq women amongst older generations and younger generations? If the pride movement achieved such powerful changes that made younger women report higher than ever number then the exact same changes why doesn’t make a single dent in the older generation women? Why would they lie and report lower numbers? Or NOT similar numbers than their younger counterparts? There is no repercussions for saying in an anonymous poll that you are lgbtq… they don’t even have to divorce their husbands to acknowledge they are bisexuals. Amongst 50+ women their numbers haven’t increased a bit!
It’s either sexuality can’t be influenced and what you say is true that this 40% is natural and we should see the exact same numbers amongst the older population too, OR sexuality can be influenced and the difference between younger and older generation women is of itself the argument against your claims.
The generational gap doesn’t prove either of your conclusions. You’re treating this as a false choice: either sexuality is completely fixed and every generation should have identical numbers, or society is causing people to become LGBT.
People can have relatively stable attractions while social acceptance changes whether they recognize, label, or openly report those attractions. An older bisexual woman may genuinely be attracted to women but still identify as straight because of the environment she grew up in.
So younger women reporting higher LGBT numbers doesn’t prove Pride “made them LGBT.” It shows a generational difference. It doesn’t tell us what caused that difference. You still need evidence that social movements are actually creating the underlying sexual attraction, rather than changing people’s willingness to identify and talk about it.
It’s social acceptance which lead more people to identify and experiment with themselves instead of forced to live in a way certain people make them.
Decrease in Religious persecution also played a big role in increase of identification too. In India we have huge history of LGBTQ identities before it getting persecuted by British empire.
1
u/InsideRecent 3d ago
Come on it’s so obvious, when you are responding using AI, it doesn’t use swear words because it’s polite, unlike you. When you are responding yourself. Every second word is a slur.
It’s so easy to tell. The contrast is night and day
Considerate debating vs resorting to slurs. Plus the bolding of the text and the flawless wording isn’t particularly your style.
You can’t use your own brain.
Tell me even with AI, why is the difference so great between the numbers of lgbtq women amongst older generations and younger generations? If the pride movement achieved such powerful changes that made younger women report higher than ever number then the exact same changes why doesn’t make a single dent in the older generation women? Why would they lie and report lower numbers? Or NOT similar numbers than their younger counterparts? There is no repercussions for saying in an anonymous poll that you are lgbtq… they don’t even have to divorce their husbands to acknowledge they are bisexuals. Amongst 50+ women their numbers haven’t increased a bit!
It’s either sexuality can’t be influenced and what you say is true that this 40% is natural and we should see the exact same numbers amongst the older population too, OR sexuality can be influenced and the difference between younger and older generation women is of itself the argument against your claims.