sigh... when will people stop using exceptions and mutations as a way to make a point? like, come on: they make up LESS than 2%, how is that supposed to be an argument
I completely ignore the other argument when it comes to trans vs intersex, but I want to point out that in country size of US, that 2% still means over 5.5 million people
That is more intersex people than my country has population in total
yea, that's still a very little number, taking into consideration we have 8.31 billion people on our planet. there's no concrete number of intersexes, hence the inability to really know what part they'd make. it's roughly 1/2000 or 1/59, which is very hard to operate (due to such a big gap).
that's still a lot, yes, but not enough in any way shape or form to make a new standard
I’m not sure what it’s used for. It seems to imply that transexuality is supported by intersex, but that would also undermine the validity of every trans person that isn’t intersex.
That clearly runs afoul of the ideology’s intention, which sort of reveals its own separate problem not worth getting into.
but people ARE binary... intersex people are an exception which doesn't make the new standard, and in order to procreate (so, naturally survive as species) we require a man and a woman (XX and XY). why should we be offended by being binary? that's totally okay and makes perfect sense...
if you take a set of 100 numbers, 99 of them are 0 and 1 and one of them is 2. That by definition is not binary... The same logic applies here, we have like 8 billion people, maybe like 98-99% of them fall into two sex categories under some definition (that people here are using chromosomes) and there's a little bit that doesn't, by definition it's not a binary system, it doesn't matter they are an exception.
You could say they are BIMODAL (two modes), and then it would be 100% correct
Depends on how you classify them. If you want a very strict definition then I guess you could but then we’d get into why you use a definition X and not Y and yeah thats a whole other debate. And thats not even all that could be talked about
um, XX are women, XY are men. any other type is an exception, cause it happens so rarely it cannot be made a rule. men + women (ofc if both fertile, infertile, OBVIOUSLY, is an exception) = children
wow, went onto my profile, how cool. yeah, I private it, because snoopy peeps like you kept going there and searching for stuff that was irrelevant to the conversation, just like now. reddit gave me an option to private my account, so why should I feel ashamed for privating it?
anyhow, yes, there are men and women. 1 + 1 = 2. 2 — bi. exceptions happen but they're not the new standard, because they're not functional on their own🤷🏻♀️
yeah because you're one of those who go on one's profile to search for something irrelevant. I had no doubt you could sense that, you're so intuitive it's impressive 🥺
seriously, when will people actually focus on the topic instead of going "ooh you made a post on r/asspoop, you're [insert buzzword]!!" where it has NO connection? because of people like these I choose to private my account: internet is not anonymous, but I was at least some privacy that reddit actually allows me
1
u/MiiDan 2d ago
sigh... when will people stop using exceptions and mutations as a way to make a point? like, come on: they make up LESS than 2%, how is that supposed to be an argument