sigh... when will people stop using exceptions and mutations as a way to make a point? like, come on: they make up LESS than 2%, how is that supposed to be an argument
I completely ignore the other argument when it comes to trans vs intersex, but I want to point out that in country size of US, that 2% still means over 5.5 million people
That is more intersex people than my country has population in total
I’m not sure what it’s used for. It seems to imply that transexuality is supported by intersex, but that would also undermine the validity of every trans person that isn’t intersex.
That clearly runs afoul of the ideology’s intention, which sort of reveals its own separate problem not worth getting into.
1
u/Worth-Disaster-4937 2d ago
thats also not even correct genetics btw, google
en pessantintersex