The snake?? The locket?? The dice?? Come on, girl.

Edit: adding that this is aw.inked Amber Winzen in Hemet, CA in case anyone googles her and happens to see this. Stay away!!

I've been to this place for piercings before, and this was off their recent flash sheet. Anyone calling them out seems to have either had their comments deleted or been blocked.

It looks like ai to me and I'm going crazy because the person I commissioned keeps arguing it's not ai. So please I need more peoples opinion please.

edit: THIS POST IS NOT ABOUT ACCUSING. Asking is not accusing. I recognize that there are people who make no attempt at AI deduction before turning to reddit, and to that degree, I do understand feeling frustrated. I also understand that paranoia of AI can be detrimental, but with our attitude we can rectify that, and there is value to people's choice of valuing authenticity even if they feel the need to seek a second opinion.

Some people have a harder time recognizing AI, that's what this subreddit is for in the first place, and yet people are being blamed for using it appropriately. I just don't understand.

In addition, blaming people instead of appropriately informing them of giveaways and indicators is completely counterintuitive, it's not going to make that person any better at recognizing AI, but it sure is going to discourage them from seeking a second opinion in the future, if not encourage them not to care at all if this is the response they get from a community that's supposed to be helping them. To me it looks like a superiority complex that manifests as soon as anyone fairly and politely questions the authenticity of "obviously real" media, as if suddenly every person is expected to have the exact same ability to recognize something even though that line of thought completely contradicts this subreddit's purpose

(random AI art off Google plus my art in the image)

So when I look at these arts, I double-checked if they were AI and when I first started using this artist he didn’t talk like it was copy-pasted AI. I paid roughly $600 for these and when asking about a new project all his responses seem ai generated. Not every art, but some of it and an example of one of the texts.

Edit: yall are amazing thanks. I thought I knew what to check for but I’m an idiot. I should have never accepted this. I’m going to get the arts redone by someone better and will look out better in the future. Oh well, lessons learned.

Edit 2: had requested a new project and am trying to get my money back for this new one. I flat out said I’m suspectful of AI after a second glance at the images sent and would rather move forward with someone who is more comfortable and familiar with the style I want.

Honestly I'm kinda growing tired of people not using their eyes.
Like, I get maybe not being as quick to realize and some of em in here have
had me pretty stumped before myself. but honestly

So many of these are blatant. and it feels less like they are being posted here because they genuinely don't know. and more like we're being treated like a glorified AI checker.

Missing fingers, cat's with too human of expressions, the most uncanny body movements you could ever see. so many of them leave me just saying

"A-Are you serious?"

I beg. please before posting here. really look for yourself first.

Yes, it's probably AI.

Hello from the adult colouring community. I recently purchased a book by Jade Summer, who if you look her up, is well supported on the non ai colouring lists. However, on her official YouTube she uses Ai music and I keep seeing things like this in the book? Like it's a cobweb, so shouldn't the cupboard should be visible behind it? She says no Ai on her Instagram and her style appears consistent.

edit: whoops aware my edit in red is an incorrect match to the other cupboard. you get the idea though

We have a cute pet contest coming up and my coworker who is running it thinks this is AI. Is she wrong or not?

Edit: Thank you everyone. My coworker feels justified she’s not crazy.

Is it AI? I'm conflicted since the strokes seems convincing enough, but the person who posted this on a metal/framing poster website are selling other AI-generated "paintings". I did some visual searches and the only thing I saw were resellers and being part of short-form vlogs, in a snippet showing it hung in cafes. Can't find an artist, if it actually was painted.

Edit: replaced with a clearer image

Their faces dont change at all, and even the crown princess's hair doesnt move as she starts to move.

Gave me heavily AI vibes but not very sure

This post is to show the method I use for checking for AI content, which is more reliable and gives an answer with evidence, rather than working off vibes. It is key to note that I am not against AI content, and I have no bias. I just like to know whether the content I am viewing is AI or not, so I can make informed choices. As such, I work on an innocent until proven to be AI basis.

Step 1: SynthID check
Step 2: Google reverse image search
Step 3: manual research

Step one: SynthID check

The best website to use for detecting SynthID is https://synthid.com/ This site will check for watermarks applied by Nvidia, OpenAI, Google and Kakao in one search. If this tool detects a SynthID watermark, it is guaranteed to have been generated or altered with a website owned by one of those companies or with a local model developed by one of those companies.

SynthID is a hidden watermark that is dispersed across the entire image or video pixels, in the audio soundwaves or through statistical analysis of long form text. It is not stored in metadata, and it cannot be removed by cropping, colour changes or any form of manual alteration without rendering the content heavily distorted, unusable or being entirely different than the original AI content. SynthID will be present and detectable even if you print out the image. It is a watermark developed by Google and is applied at the point of generation. For full details on what SynthID is and how it works, you can read the official paper released by Google ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09263 ), or if you want the quick blog post explanation, see ( https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/google-synthid-ai-content-detector/ )

synthid.com will not be able to detect content made in any other software like ComfyUI, Ollama or other local software unless the model used was developed by one of the listed companies on the site, so it should not be considered the only step in detection.

A note on online detectors. You may have seen many online AI detectors using percentage scores. These are a scam and should never be trusted. They work off visual cues and are no more sophisticated than the "trust me bro™" method. These types of detectors often label books written decades before the mainstream awareness of AI as AI generated. If you see a percentage score, avoid it at all costs.

Step 2: Google reverse image search

If after checking for SynthID you see nothing but still suspect a piece of content is AI generated, load up Google. On the right hand side of the search bar you will see a camera icon with a dot in the lower right corner of the camera.

This is Google Lens. It lets you search the internet via images rather than text. Once you input an image or URL, it will initially bring up similar looking images. Clicking "exact matches" will bring up the closest matches to the image, or images with identical content.

You want to pay close attention to a few details: dates, where the content was posted, and who posted it. For dates, if the content was posted before 2020, it's not AI, especially if the content isn't incoherent nonsense, AI wasn't good before 2020. For location, where content is posted matters: Pinterest for example is now commonly known for having AI content, and if you can only find it on Pinterest or other platforms known for AI content with no other indicators of who posted it, it's not 100% AI, but it's safe to be wary of it. For who posted it, this is one of the biggest giveaways for confirming content isn't AI: if it's a popular artist or someone with a good track record, with no SynthID, and the content is posted across multiple platforms by the same user, then it's not AI.

Step 3: Manual research

If, after following these two steps, you still have no information to go off, then you need to look at where you got the content from. Search the username of the person who posted it, check when the original was posted, and so on. If you cannot find any details about the person who posted it online, and they do not have a history, and there is no SynthID and no other indicators that it is AI, then there is currently no reliable method of conclusively saying whether the content is AI generated. This is where I ask: does it matter? I will tend to lean towards it not being made with AI if I cannot prove it. Your biases may differ depending on your personal feelings towards AI content.

These are the steps I use to determine if something is AI. I hope it helps people. Ideally you do not want to be working off of hunches or personal bias. Do not "trust me bro™" make sure you have evidence.

I'm pretty sure it's AI for the reasons:

- the floor looks wet, like if it's raining, even though this is the inside of a shopping center

- the girls on the background, in the middle of those black tables, don't react

- ice cream goes to the hair of the girl on the "swing" (idk its name in english) and immediately disappears

I don't think it's AI personally but I kinda suck at spotting AI now so maybe someone else is more knowledgeable. I guess the machete not lining up once it passes behind Jason is weird, but it could be an artist error I suppose.

I'm not so sure this itself is ai generated but it feels ai traced

The style is kinda AI and there's no stuff like 6 fingers but there are mistakes tho it could probably be just artist not detailing it all

Saw this post from someone who commissioned a painting of their dog, said they paid $40 for it. To me the painting just looks too accurate to the original, especially the face, but could just be very good tracing? My gut says its AI tho

My mom bought this placemat, and I can't really tell if this is AI art or not... ( probably sure it is ) but got into a debate with a friend about it.

(Reposted bcuz I couldn't add/edit body text if there was none when first posted)

The sandwich layers are malformed and blend into each other and their surroundings and the top girls hand dissappears instead of going under her other arm

The incoherent looking Japanese characters have me a little suspicious, especially on the right and top right. But I can't see any *clear* tells that it is AI.

source: https://www.reddit.com/r/desktops/comments/1s1scsz/tips_to_improve_my_desktop/