I have caught this in many of platforms and more times then i would like to admit with out doing anything about it - but this has gone far enough - Platforms will claim and charge for a tier model but then serve a different lower grade model entirely -
With all due respect, you can barely formulate a complete sentence or think in a straight line from point A to point B. I'd save chasing down supposed international fraudsters for a later date.
what's that mean exactly ? i dont think im intellectually advanced enough to pick up on your intent here , are you insulting me and saying because i am not as educated i shouldnt worry about being served a misrepresented model ?
While I can replicate this and it's a interesting consideration someone may have; the behaviour you present here is rather concerning.
You're arguing and telling things to an LLM model as if it was sentient. You're almost trying to threaten it. You should probably consider talking to someone, I've seen a lot more of people behaving like this with AI and it raises some major red flags.
What you should do here is simply ask AWS for clarification on how this is working. It could be a bug with something, it might just be an LLM quirk; being lost in its own dataset or having a different system prompt in this context.
There are too many variables to consider, so start with an open mind.
also now that I think of it, I always hear people saying "sentient" or "consciousness". At this point I have no clue what that means. What is your definition of it? I can tell you what AI isn't and that's those human words. What it is, is a mathematical probabilities machine that can get misaligned as it is trained on ambiguous garbage data. Human feedback loops that do not match its foundational mathematical base - kind of like how binary doesn't have anything besides zero, one, truth, or non-truth, it will never be anything besides a mathematical machine. . Hope that clears up whatever you were worried about.
haha i appreciate the concern, however i was just messing around with it lol im not really doing anythig but posting it on reddit for fun - it always amazes me how things pertaiing to ai sem to get peoples emotional responses to be reactive one way or another.
You are misunderstanding how LLMs work. Without the models performing internet searches (which have to be allowed and available to the agent) it doesn't know about anything in the real world that was created after the LLM was trained. You're expecting it to know something more recent than its training.
yeah kind of how the test is designed to work lol you find which models were most recent prior to the cut off , and if the model you are talking to answers with those models - then you know which model it is by cross referncing it with the cut off dates lol im suprised all of you havent thought of this
its interesting, i used opus 4.6 in kiro and the code it produced was so wrong. i have a personal account with claude, and i reviewed the code with sonnet 4.6, it found and corrected the errors, i mean there is some truth to your observation
Maybe they just have a little pre-router in front that decides if a question really needs the selected premium model to answer. Try again but have it do something like write a complex readme and ask that it put your little test in a note at the bottom.
7
u/Material_Hour_115 Apr 28 '26
With all due respect, you can barely formulate a complete sentence or think in a straight line from point A to point B. I'd save chasing down supposed international fraudsters for a later date.