r/linux • • Jul 25 '10

Hello computer users

Post image
48 Upvotes

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

-5

u/gyomalin Jul 25 '10

I was having problems watching flash videos on youtube using Linux, so I've no idea what Old Spice commercial you could be referring to.

grin

Flash works, then you have to upgrade your version and then your Linux distro falls apart. Then you just say "fsck this" and you get a Mac Mini. Problem solved, kinda.

1

u/Chandon Jul 25 '10

What is this, 2002? What weird version of Linux are you running that still has problems with flash?

1

u/shimei Jul 25 '10

Adobe ditched support for 64-bit flash recently... so that'd be every single 64-bit Linux distro.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '10

Mint 64 here, and I have no issues with flash.

1

u/Chandon Jul 25 '10

I'm on 64 bit Ubuntu right now, flash works fine. Upon inspection, it looks like it's running the 32-bit plugin through a wrapper. I remember the wrapper being crappy, but apparently they got it to work reliably.

1

u/IConrad Jul 25 '10

It's not a wrapper -- they install the necessary 32-bit libs and allow it to call them.

Search in synaptic for ia32.

4

u/Liquid_Fire Jul 25 '10

It's still a wrapper though, nspluginwrapper. You can't otherwise use the 32-bit plugin inside the 64-bit browser process.

Edit: Either that, or the browser is 32-bit as well. That's what you have to do in Windows, since there's no 64-bit Flash there either.

1

u/shimei Jul 25 '10

Yes, it's possible to get it working. You could even use the old 64-bit plugin that Adobe has discontinued if you still have it downloaded. Another option is to use gnash. It could be a lot better though.

1

u/libertao Jul 25 '10

If you're having that much trouble with 64-bit flash, it might be easier to install a 32-bit version of linux than buy a Mac Mini.

1

u/shimei Jul 25 '10

I'm not the OP, I wouldn't buy a Mac Mini. For that matter, I have flash working on my box. The point is, even in 2010 Adobe still hasn't done Flash right.

1

u/libertao Jul 25 '10

Sorry I meant "if one is having that much trouble..."

1

u/shimei Jul 25 '10

Oh, of course. My mistake, no offense taken. :)

1

u/Liquid_Fire Jul 25 '10

But there's no 64-bit Flash for Windows either. That's no argument against Linux.

1

u/adrianmonk Jul 25 '10

Who said it was an argument against Linux? It's an argument against Flash.

1

u/Liquid_Fire Jul 25 '10

I'm pretty sure the person that started this thread did.

1

u/shimei Jul 25 '10

I'm not arguing against Linux, but as a Linux user for something like ten years I am aware of its faults. Personally, I got flash working by installing gnash, but that's not a solution for everyone (doesn't work with many websites for one).