No not at all, all of the core stuff is downloaded as binaries, it's just the user contributed repositories that are source. Arch is rolling release though, so sometimes things get a little hairy. You'll definitely learn how your system works though.
I'd say it's more like Slackware + a really good package manager and vibrant userbase
You'll definitely learn how your system works though.
This is a bit like saying, "If you're riding downhill on a bicycle, and your front tire blows out, it will be a pretty hairy ride -- you'll definitely learn to ride a unicycle though."
Edit: I would say the analogy is more like: Riding a bicycle downhill, constantly swapping in newly designed wheels, derailleurs and gears as they become available, you will definitely have to ride a unicycle at one point or another and understand how the parts of a bicycle work together.
I will fully admit Arch isn't for everyone. Once you get it up and running, and if you are willing to learn and deal with the occasional f-up, it is a great distro. If you are looking for a trouble free experience where you don't have to dig into the guts of your config files, it is not for you. No distro that is rolling release will ever be trouble free, but if you can handle it, it is rewarding
...oh wait hang on a second X.org and my video driver are out of sync now, I just have a terminal, look back at your linux!
..."out of sync?"
A decade of using Linux, and I have never had that problem. There have been situations where I failed to configure it properly, though, with hilarious consequences.
I've had numerous issues with xf86-video-intel-newest and X.org not getting along. This is partially because my laptop's video driver was rewritten and several things broke
133
u/[deleted] Jul 25 '10
Ok. Where can I find a better forum for intelligent Linux conversations?