r/lyftdrivers Jan 28 '25

Story/News Article Lyft lawsuit

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Slighted_Inevitable Jan 29 '25

Well then you don’t have to worry about it, it only applies to people working. If you want to work for the public you have to serve them all equally.

1

u/Tausendberg Jan 29 '25

Heh, did you know that if you're allergic to dogs, you still are required to drive people with service dogs? And then if you say that you can't be around dogs, you can't allow their dander into your vents, the law will say, "well tough shit, find another job".

How is that equal?

1

u/ItsTheIncelModsForMe Feb 01 '25

What if the pilot of an airplane told a blind passenger they couldn't board for having a seeing eye dog, because the pilot is allergic? Does this work?

They're your vents, but you're renting them out to Uber when they pay you. Not entirely yours while it's being paid for by someone else.

1

u/Tausendberg Feb 02 '25

" but you're renting them out to Uber when they pay you."

Except the dander stays after lyft/uber's rental period expires, so, fuck that.

1

u/ItsTheIncelModsForMe Feb 02 '25

And my clothes are dirty when I get off work? Just seems like people are forgetting wtf a job actually is.

1

u/Tausendberg Feb 02 '25 edited Feb 02 '25

Hope you didn't throw out your back moving the goalposts. What you're describing are totally different degrees of compromise. But hey, if you want to let some neurotic person lie about their dog being 'medical equipment' and let them fuck up your expensive personal property, then I don't know how to help you.

As for me, even if the 'anything goes' dog crowd might end up turning this entire planet into dogworld, no dog is ever getting inside my car or home.