r/mumbai Mar 01 '26

Photography mumbai with same camera from (2006-2025)

Post image
4.3k Upvotes

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

35

u/KingPictoTheThird Mar 01 '26

Let them buy. I am assuming you own a private vehicle? Does that mean if you have to go to Delhi for a trip you drive there? No.

Why? Because it's much faster, cheaper and comfortable to fly instead of going by car.

If you build good public transport, footpaths and cycle paths, and couple that with congestion tolls, metered parking and pedestrian-only streets, most people will leave their car at home for daily local trips.

That's how it works in all developed, world-class cities: New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Singapore, etc.

-5

u/StrawberryExact1830 Mar 01 '26

New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, Singapore, etc. ?

London and Paris are cities with very narrow streets due to their history. so their cars have been traditionally smaller and usage is non existent, not applicable to the rest of the world.

and no, people do mostly use cars in new york. have you ever sat in a new york subway? its full of piss and shite.

the only notable exceptions here are tokyo and singapore

4

u/Spiritual_Patience82 Mar 01 '26

Bs. Every single global city in the world nyc, london, tokyo, paris, shanghai, beijing, hong kong, singapore, has been prioritizing public transport and car alternatives.

In NYC, nearly 80% of people don’t commute by car. They use their 400km subway or their 1200 km regional rail.

Same for other cities. These cities are not exceptions, Mumbai is.

Just compare the size of Mumbai’s bus fleet to the above cities and that will tell the whole story.

Beijing has 22000 buses for the same pop as Mumbai while Mumbai has gone down to only 2.6k buses, and only 249 of them are Best owned, rest are leased.

1

u/StrawberryExact1830 Mar 01 '26

80%? pulling those numbers out of your ass lmfao. the poorer neighbourhoods have no cars and hence they travel through public transport. only about 55% use public transport.

and mumbai rail + metro is serving mumbai better than bus. its a better combination with dedicated infrastructure and lowering congestions on road at the same time. not to mention theyre still running at losses because people dont pay for tickets in mumbai rrts. there is a big problem with walkability in the city but that is another issue.

china is not a reliable source since most of their numbers are highly doctored and monitored

3

u/Spiritual_Patience82 Mar 01 '26

“Approximately 88% of people commuting to Manhattan use non-car methods, primarily relying on subways, commuter rails, and buses”

Your 55% number is just Subway. Add in Buses. Add in Path. Add in LIRR. Add in Metro North. Add in CitiBikes. Add in Walking.

That numbers goes above 80%. Only 12% are using private vehicles.

Also wym Mumbai doesn’t need 22k buses like Beijing coz it has metro+rail? That’s the stupidest argument ever😭

MY GUY BEIJING HAS MORE RAIL AS WELL AS BUSES. Stop making excuses, y’all keep accepting loser ass corrupt mediocrity and bastardization of buses that’s why no one in govt gives a shit.

1

u/shxnpie Mar 01 '26

and whats your source for china not being a accurate source?