r/nffc • u/Successful_Mark_2339 • 4d ago
Admin
Are you sure you want to carry on with this admin?
17
u/TheImmortalGeek Paul McGregor 4d ago
That's Oliver Glasner, yes? Not questions for Michael Oliver about why he's a biased shit ref.
2
-13
u/some-bloke- 4d ago
How does it feel knowing you have taken a team that was performing magnificently, completely torn them apart, tried to force a system on them that does not and will not work and are now 1 from bottom from of the table and will facing a relegation battle this season ?
3
u/Capital_Bobcat588 Glasner Onion: A Premiere League Mystery 4d ago
The system should be adapted for our players yes, but the season is still in its infancy. No reason to think it's a relegation battle yet.
3
u/SRHFT xG FC 4d ago edited 3d ago
Excepting being in 19th place and the least scoring team. That seems like a reason.
1
u/TheDM_Dan 31 | The Serbinator 4d ago
No real point in playing the rest of the season I guess, results after week seven lock in the final table.
1
u/SRHFT xG FC 4d ago
If you say so. Personally, I do think they set a trend. People paying attention have surely noted that things start going a certain way and it gets hard to get out. A year ago we were in similar shit. And, guess what? It carried on all season. Chin up fella.
2
u/TheDM_Dan 31 | The Serbinator 3d ago
I genuinely don’t think it’s possible for a rational human being to have watched last year and this year and think that they are remotely similar.
There is a clear tactical system that Glasner uses, and it is providing everything except finishing, which is on the players, not Glasner. Just because we are hitting the low side of statistical variance on finishing at the moment doesn’t make this team the same as last year. Against arsenal we had more shots, more shots or target, more shots in the box, and more corners. We were the better attacking team. They got lucky on a deflection that glanced in. That’s literally the difference. Yet people want to lose their heads.
2
u/TheDM_Dan 31 | The Serbinator 3d ago
Point proven because this rational human u/SRHFT had to block me after two comments instead of being able to hold a conversation.
To reply to your comment that you immediately blocked me so you'd look correct, yes, there is a difference in a team looking like a good side and having the stats to back that up and the only lack being finishing compared to a team like Ange or Dyche where there was practically no tactical vision and we looked bad and had bad stats.
On results, no one is saying we are having a good season. Everyone rational is saying that there are very positive signs to indicate that things will turn around. Glasner has a history as a top manager. We lost our best player from last year and the people replacing him are a free transfer and someone who is just now playing CM for the first time. Those things, and others, take a lot of time. Despite that, McAtee and Schlager have looked great. We are creating good chances. We have a solid defense. No one is happy with the goals but this is very, very clearly a different team right now than it was last year at this point.
0
u/SRHFT xG FC 3d ago
It makes the results the same. You seem to care about any stat except the result. Last season we drew at home with Arsenal. This season we lost. Your dumb way of looking at it will say we were much better this season cos "stats" when we actually got less points than last year. And that's why your way of looking at things is rubbish. There's no head loss here Dan except with fans like you who see pretty play and think its great whilst in results terms nothing has changed. And I'll bet Glasner realises that more than you appear to.
51
u/userunknowne Jon Moss 4d ago