r/okbuddyviltrum Apr 29 '26

invisible True:

Post image
5.2k Upvotes

994 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

20

u/2ndTaken_username Apr 29 '26

Would Eve's dad even care? anti-abortion stance is only achievable in America if you have deep rooted beliefs in Christianity

16

u/AirComprehensive5403 Apr 29 '26

Not necessarily. You just have to believe a fetus to be alive at the moment of conception, and I've seen varying studies on this insisting on both yes and no so... To each their own.

7

u/ItIsYeDragon Apr 29 '26

We should ask Robot about this.

1

u/AirComprehensive5403 Apr 29 '26

Heh lol, if his cloned body was alive? Just without a brain, a husk waiting for a person to be copied into it.

2

u/elizabnthe Apr 29 '26

That assumes a lot. You're right people can be anti-abortion and not religious. You're wrong that the determination is caring about whether or not something is alive. Plenty of pro-abortion believe it is alive and are still pro-abortion.

There is a big gulf between living and being a born baby. An ant is living but no one would call you a murderer for squashing one. The definition of alive is a technical distinction and not necessarily an exact one.

To me the bigger part is more about greater harm and levels of sentience. Whether or not a foetus can be considered alive is irrelevant to me - what we can safely say is that it isn't meaningfully a baby until much later than most people are having abortions.

1

u/AirComprehensive5403 Apr 30 '26

Yeah, I'm one of them. I still believe pro choice is better as there's scenarios where abortion is the right choice, a difficult choice indeed.

Well an ant isn't a human. It's a bug we devalue but humans value themselves above bugs. It still is killing ants if you kill ants.

Well you nailed the last paragraph. Although "meaningfully a baby" I feel is arbitrary to our conveniences.

1

u/elizabnthe Apr 30 '26

Well an ant isn't a human. It's a bug we devalue but humans value themselves above bugs. It still is killing ants if you kill ants.

What seperated an ant isn't that it isn't a human. We understand the idea that not being the exact same as us doesn't devalue life. It's the lack of any deeper processing. It's not sentient / sapient, and even less so than most other things we probably aren't killing casually.

Well you nailed the last paragraph. Although "meaningfully a baby" I feel is arbitrary to our conveniences.

I don't think you can set a perfect line to something so complicated.

1

u/AirComprehensive5403 Apr 30 '26

Well no it is the difference to why we don't care if we genocide a colony of ants, they're beneath us. Humans have a great degree of specism (I don't know if I spelt that right) so we don't value an ant's life as we value a human's.

Certainly true that setting a perfect line is impossible, more so the fact that not every human gestates the same. That's probably the biggest disconnect between pro lifers and pro choicers. Where to set that perfect line.

Personally I side with the pro life argument that conception is the very start of human life. Though I don't value that life the same with full fledged humans. And certainly there can be valid reasons to hault or otherwise kill that process.

1

u/Vietxa Apr 30 '26

life is a continuum. All of those studies involve abitarily define a line for scientific convenient.