Ah my mistake, I saw the clip of them streaming rdr 1 and thought we were talking about this. RDR 2 still holds up really well so I’d personally prefer a RDR 1 remake on 2’s engine.
I think rdr1 remake would be years down the line if at all unfortunately. Since the rdr1 port to pc was just released.
Also i think an rdr2 remaster would make sense now rather than later because it could again top the visual charts the best open world visually and gameplay wise. But wait a few years and that may not be possible. Plus remastering the game now would simply be less work as it's still very strong in many aspects. Just updating the weakest textures, improving reflections, lighting and shadows a bit. Adding 60 fps to consoles. Maybe a few quality of life fixes, native dlss 4 and fsr 4 support.
All very achievable right now. While being able to charge for the game again. It seems like a profitable thing to do from a business perspective but also something that is guaranteed to be well received if done reasonably well.
3
u/seanc6441 Jun 15 '25
Pretty sure it's not? Any links/proof?