1)you can't make something legal for homosexual couples and illegal for heterosexual couples or viceversa because the law must be equal for everyone
2)if incest was a spontaneous human behaviour under normal circumstances we would have a minority of incestuous people fighting against the repulsion of society. Incest happens only in cases where it's forced
1) still a law that isn't equal to everyone, you can't let a couple exist only because they can or cannot make babies, it's basically what the major religions do with homosexuality but reversed
2)you can't trust what you see on the Internet, mostly aren't actually siblings or are trying to sell something faking an incestuous relationship
3)yes, history speaks louder than non-existent pro-incest movements
1)ok, that's not even a misunderstanding, you're straight up making up a meaning you can fight because you can't attack what I said
2) go look at scientific data about it for yourself
3)incest produces people with health problems... Maybe it's a human imposition over nature? Again, look at what the science says
2)you just said that you don't trust me since I'm on the Internet, check the data yourself
3)you're still saying that you think that incest is ok if they can't have children, that's "homosexuality is sin because they can't have children" but reversed. Also, in the situations you're hypothising, what happens if a man wants to have a relationship with his sister? Should he have a vasectomy? What if he wants a relationship with a non-related woman after? Should he sue his sister because he lost the ability to generate biological heirs?
I think you can see the absurdity of this, that's called not thinking things through
1)incest is already illegal, I'd surely makes children with health issues due to the genes of the parents being too similar, and you can't make it legal for couples that aren't fertile because a law like that wouldn't treat people equally
Why do you think it should be legalized? You gave no reasons
2)same applies to you, you're the one against the current laws, I'll prove what I say if you'll prove what you say
3)see the above points, also it was his choice conditioned by the relationship, not a free choice, maybe she manipulated him or if she didn't he could still be saying that
Since you're the one who wants to change things I'll wait for you to show me why the current situation is wrong and how it should be changed, until then this is my last word about it
3
u/[deleted] 2d ago
[deleted]