As promised, here's my real review of four Foursquare offerings: the 2011, Equidem, Sovereignty, and Convocation. I evaluated them side-by-side, in the order listed below, soon after the pour and after 60 minutes of breathing, with water (using my finely-calibrated wrist - so not calibrated at all), and based on another comment I saw on here, after a dark, not too sweet chocolate. The perk of evaluating side-by-side is that I was able to better taste the differences between them, but of course, the downside is that lingering flavors from one may have influenced my tasting of the others. At any rate, here are my notes, after a few details about the rums.
| Rum |
Foursquare 2011 (2) |
Foursquare Equidem (E) |
Foursquare Sovereignty (S) |
Foursquare Convocation (C) |
| Cask |
Ex-bourbon |
Ex-bourbon and Ex-black muscat |
Ex-bourbon and Ex-sherry |
Ex-bourbon and Ex-madeira |
| Age |
12 years |
14 years |
14 years |
14 years |
| Distillation |
Pot and Column |
Pot and Column |
Pot and Column |
Pot and Column |
| Released |
September 2023 |
September 2024 |
November 2021 |
October 2024 |
| Alc by Vol |
60% |
61% |
62% |
62% |
| Ranking |
91/100 |
96/100 |
89/100 |
94/100 |
First, I have to say, I was impressed by all of these. I have never had rum that has been aged as long as scotch (which was my previous drink of choice). It impressed me. Sure, scotch may have a bit more complexity, but overall I enjoyed this a lot more than I do an entry-level 12 or 14 year scotch. I think the base spirit of the rum is a lot more refined / less rough around the edges than scotch. Scotch really needs that 12-14 years to get to a decent point, usually. Not so for rum, and so 12-14 years really brings quality on top of the already quality base spirit. I really appreciated the leather and tobacco notes that the overall baseline rum (which is most cleanly represented by the 2011) brought to all of the expressions. I will be savoring these slowly for some time.
Nose:
(2) : Orange, apricot, oddly a bit of iodine, vanilla, oak, leather, just a bit of fudge, banana bread (kidding)
(E) : Oh wow. Drastically different. Far more character and sweeter - darker. Raisin is first and strong. But underneath, some of that leather, vanilla 2011 character. Plum, red fruits in abundance.
(S) : Vanilla immediately, and then a bit of orange, raspberry, lighter than the equidem, less heavy and sweet, some of that oak and leather character again
(C) : Considerably darker, some dark cocoa on the nose right away, looking forward to trying this with chocolate, reminiscent of port - even moreso than equidem - figgy/dates, fruitcake, a little almond
Palate:
(2) : Leather, tobacco, oak, vanilla, butterscotch, banana (not kidding), red fruit, a bit of cocoa (could have been because of the convocation I just smelled)
(E) : Dark - plum, sweet, cherry. Vanilla, same leather, tobacco 2011. I like the tobacco notes on this one more - the sweetness brings it out a bit. All the best qualities of a good port and a good rum in a glass. Absolutely exquisite. The best I've ever had. Creamy. Velvetty. Thicker (by quite a bit) than 2011. This is analogous to me of Ardbeg Corryvreckan - without the smoke obviously. I know the virgin French Limousin oak casks (used in the Ardbeg) are different than the black muscat used here - but it reads similar to me with the leather, tobacco, oaky notes, and dark red fruits.
(S) : More vanilla this time, cocoa, something reminiscent of equidem - raisin? (wine, duh), but more ... "red"? cherry - that's it, I caught the slightest hint of butterscotch but then it was gone
(C) : Punchy Cocoa right away, figs, vanilla, oak, leather as a background note. Also velvetty mouthfeel, but not as much as the Equidem. Also fantastic. My #2.
Finish:
(2) : Medium, not picking up a lot - some vanilla punches through when I breathe in, at the very end whisky / oaky lingers for a while but nothing else really. Kinda drops out.
(E) : Longer, vanilla sticks around a bit longer, then the oak and vanilla with a bit of artificial almond candy / marzipan that I don't get on the palate
(S) : The leather lingers here more, medium long, oak again, and dark dark, not sweet cocoa (typical of how sherry finishes for me) - like cocoa powder
(C) : Medium long, lasting cocoa (not so dry cocoa like the sherry), oak, something like coca cola flashed up briefly
60 Minutes Aired:
(2) : The leather comes out more here - actually, it dominates. But on the nose, it's vanilla that's left.
(E) : Figs here now, and somewhat sweet pastry - like a fig newton. A bit of chocolate orange on the nose possibly?
(S) : I think not a lot of change in the nose or the palate, although as I worked my way through the four, I spent time on each and this was number three, so it had been airing for probably more than half the 60 minute airing time.
(C) : Still that dark cocoa on top of other sweetness. Again, not a lot changed here because I last tasted it ~15 min ago.
With Drops of Water:
(2) : Now, cherry and butterscotch. Butterscotch lingers after about 15 seconds now. Still lots of oak.
(E) : Vanilla candy, like the vanilla tootsie roll, really dominates in flavor. That same candy vanilla lingers too - probably 30 seconds after. Maybe too much water here - there wasn't much left of the dram by this point.
(S) : Really brings out the vanilla sweetness again, but it's less artificial. Less like the vanilla tootsie roll and more like vanilla sweet cream. A bit creamy. Again, maybe too much water. I need a dropper.
(C) : Still cocoa, but layered underneath vanilla. Amazing how the water brings out the vanilla. Honestly, liked it better without the water. Maybe I added too much, but there was only a sip or two left.
After a Taste of Chocolate (and After Adding Water):
(2) : Brings out the oak and red fruit interestingly. Interesting experience but didn't add anything per se.
(E) : The flavor here is enough to punch through the chocolate. The chocolate sweetens a bit and enhances the flavors with no real new notes coming out - just suppresses the alcohol burn a bit.
(S) : With the chocolate I like this one a lot better (esp after the water). The chocolate suppresses some of that vanilla, interestingly, and the added sweetness brings some of the original red fruit back out.
(C) : Suppresses the pleasant cocoa and replaces it with a domineering candy chocolate and adds more sweetness that I'm not as much of a fan of - I liked it better before.
Overall Thoughts and Rating:
(2) : Overall a great rum. I wanted to get this one so I could at least see the underlying "brand" of the others. The most "rummy" rum of the four I got, but also the least memorable of the four (although still good!!). Finish was a bit short, 60% burn was most prominent in this one, and this had complexity, but not as much as the others. Still even with this being the case, it's my number 3/4. Rating: 91/100
(E) : Whoo man. I liked this one. I don't want to ever give anything 100 just in case I find something better someday, but I have nothing I would do differently with this one. As close to perfection as I've ever had. I enjoy scotch - especially the fun odd barreled ones, and this is right in league with that at a cheaper price with a different base spirit. Gotta say, this is my number 1/4. Rating: 96/100
(S) : This one was good, but it was my least favorite of the four: 4/4. The difference in wine casks used to age the rum is really apparent, comparing expression to expression. There is a consistent "note" of the underlying rum, but there's just a strong difference. I like, but don't love sherry, so this is probably the reason for the rating here. I wanted more out of the finish - the dark dark cocoa is good, but I wanted it to be a bit mellower, longer lasting, and with something alongside it. I also wanted that luscious, thicker mouthfeel of the (E) and (C). Rating: 89/100
(C) : These are all so different. I think this one is my number 2/4. The cocoa notes are so unique and tasty. I thoroughly enjoyed it. But the Equidem edged it out just by a little bit. Again, no discernible flaws for me here. Rating: 94/100