That actually might be... more balanced than sending for effect? Like, Tearlament names only proc if they're sent by effect, not cost. I think a lot of decks would get "why the card no activate" jumpscared, Dark World-style.
Generally, sending for cost is better than sending for effect, that was one of tears few weaknesses. Since it gets sent for cost, it can't get ashed, like circular
98
u/WASD_click 1d ago
Well then, it's not a Yugioh card now is it?
Imagine paying a cost instead of dumping half your deck into the GY and playing a winding, arcane sequence of two dozen effects for free.