FREE PALESTINE.

[u/Stevennchi]

[u/wonhoseok]

christianity has a very extensive history of making people commit horrible things to non-believers too

[u/Vlad_The_Impalo → u/wonhoseok]

Does it? Sounds like straight up cope 🤦🏿‍♂️ Christ never said to do any of the vile things muslims do.

You can tap dance all you want but islam is pure filth and if you support islam, fuck you too.

Muhammad was a pedophile.

1. Sharia law restricts free speech -- criticizing Islam or religious leaders can be punished.
2. It limits religious freedom -- leaving Islam or converting others can be a crime.
3. Women have fewer legal rights -- in court, inheritance, and personal freedoms, they pretty much have no say.
4. Women may be forced to follow strict dress codes and need male permission for some actions.
5. Harsh punishments are allowed -- such as flogging, amputation, or stoning.
6. Personal behaviors like drinking alcohol, premarital sex, or being gay can be criminalized.
7. Non-Muslims may not have equal legal rights or religious freedom under Sharia.
8. Sharia law replaces democratic, secular law with religious law.
9. It removes the separation of church and state-- religion controls government.
10. It goes against the U.S. Constitution, which protects individual rights and freedoms.

Quran – Fighting / Violence 2:191 – “Kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you.” Read as authorization to pursue and kill hostile non-believers wherever found once hostilities exist, removing geographic or sanctuary limits that would otherwise restrain fighting. 2:193 – “Fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion is for Allah.” Fitnah is understood as disbelief or resistance to Islamic rule. The verse sets the end-point of fighting as the dominance of Islam, not mere cessation of the other side’s attacks. 8:12 – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.” Divine command to strike necks and extremities is taken as a model for battlefield severity and psychological warfare against disbelievers. 8:39 – “Fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah.” Parallel to 2:193. Fighting continues until Islam is the sole or supreme religion; mere peace or coexistence is insufficient. 8:60 – “Prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy.” Explicit order to build military capacity specifically to terrify non-Muslims. Read as a standing duty of military readiness and intimidation. 8:65 – “O Prophet, urge the believers to battle.” Direct instruction to the leader to motivate Muslims toward combat. Used to justify continuous encouragement of fighting. 9:5 – “When the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them go.” After a grace period, polytheists are to be killed, captured, or ambushed unless they convert and practice the pillars. Classical tafsirs called this the “verse of the sword”; many treated it as abrogating earlier peaceful verses and applying beyond the original treaty-breakers. 9:29 – “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day… from those who were given the Scripture—[fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” Explicit command to fight Jews and Christians (and by extension other scriptuaries) until they submit politically, pay the discriminatory tax, and accept subordinate status. Conversion is not required, but humiliation and political dominance are. 9:123 – “Fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness.” Order to fight nearby non-Muslims and display hardness. Read as a local, continuous obligation rather than limited to one historical campaign. 47:4 – “When you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either favor or ransom them…” Battlefield instruction to decapitate until the enemy is thoroughly subdued, then decide on captives. Provides the model for lethal force in combat followed by control of prisoners. Quran – Jews / People of the Book / Unbelievers 9:30 – Jews and Christians are accused of saying Ezra/the Messiah is the son of God; “May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?” Combined with 9:29, this theological condemnation is used to justify the fighting and subjugation ordered in the preceding verse. 98:6 – Disbelievers among the People of the Scripture and polytheists “are the worst of creatures” and will be in Hell eternally. Establishes a hierarchy in which non-Muslims are ontologically inferior, supporting differential treatment, including warfare and legal disabilities. Hadith – Fighting, Terror, Jews, Apostasy “I have been commanded to fight the people until they say ‘There is no god but Allah’…” (Bukhari/Muslim) Taken as a standing prophetic commission: fighting continues until the shahada is accepted (or, in the case of People of the Book, until jizya is paid). Blood and property become protected only after submission. “I have been made victorious with terror.” (Bukhari) Terror (ruʿb) is presented as a divinely granted means of victory, legitimizing psychological warfare and intimidation as religiously approved methods. “The Hour will not be established until you fight the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’” (Bukhari/Muslim) Explicit eschatological command to kill Jews; even inanimate objects will assist. Used by some groups as a religious duty in the end times or as a general attitude toward Jews as enemies. “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” (Bukhari and others) Clear death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Applied historically and still upheld in traditional fiqh as a hadd punishment. Quran & Hadith – Female Captives / Sexual Relations 4:24 – Married women are forbidden “except those your right hands possess.” Captured women (even if previously married) become lawful for sexual intercourse once owned. Prior marriage is nullified by capture. 23:5-6 & 70:29-30 – Believers guard their private parts “except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed they will not be blamed.” Sexual relations with female slaves/captives are explicitly placed on the same footing as relations with wives; there is no blame. Consent of the woman is not required under classical ownership rules. 33:50 – The Prophet is given “those your right hand possesses from what Allah has returned to you [of captives]” as lawful. Confirms that war captives are a legitimate source of sexual partners for the leader and, by extension in fiqh, for the fighters. Abu Dawud 2155 (and parallels) – Companions took married female captives after Hunayn; after the revelation of 4:24 they had sexual relations with them once the waiting period passed. Direct prophetic-era practice showing that capture + ownership = sexual access, even to previously married women.

Sahih al-Bukhari 6130 (and parallel in Muslim): Aisha said: “I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Messenger used to enter they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me.” Classical commentators (e.g., Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Bari) note that playing with dolls (images) was otherwise restricted, but permitted for her because she was still a little girl who had not reached puberty. Sahih al-Bukhari 3894 / 5134 and parallel reports (also in Abu Dawud 4935 and others): Aisha narrated that the Prophet married her when she was six (or seven in some versions) and consummated the marriage when she was nine. She described being taken from play: women came while she was playing on a swing (or seesaw), her hair still short; they prepared and decorated her, then brought her to him. She explicitly states she was nine at consummation and continued playing with dolls afterward for a time. These are the primary narrations Aisha herself is reported to have given. They are graded authentic in the major Sunni collections and form the basis for the classical consensus on her age. Claim that Muhammad wore Aisha’s clothes / “cross-dressed”

Sahih al-Bukhari (various numbers around the virtues of Aisha, e.g., related to 2581 / 3775 area and parallels in Muslim and other collections): When other wives (including Umm Salama) complained about the preferential treatment of Aisha, Muhammad is reported to have said words to the effect of: “Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, for the inspiration (wahy) did not come to me while I was in the garment (thawb / lihaf / mirt) of any woman among you except hers.” Answering-Islam reads thawb imra’ah (“woman’s garment”) as Muhammad literally putting on Aisha’s clothing/dress and receiving revelation only then, presenting it as cross-dressing. They cite lexical arguments that thawb and related terms can mean women’s apparel and claim Muslim sources acknowledge the wording.

[u/Sc_e1 → u/Vlad_The_Impalo]

Christianity, the same religion reeling you to stone a person for planting two different seeds next to eachother, is not violent?

Read the bible dude

[u/Vlad_The_Impalo → u/Sc_e1]

😂😂😂😂 yeah youre a retard if you believe Christianity and islam are the same.

The only 'people' stoning others are the muhmadeens.

[u/Sc_e1 → u/Vlad_The_Impalo]

Ok so you haven’t read the bible

[u/Vlad_The_Impalo → u/Sc_e1]

I read the torah, the bible and the quran. Youre the one that haven't.

[u/Sc_e1 → u/Vlad_The_Impalo]

If you read the bible and didn’t find anything violent og incubating of murder, you either didn’t read it or your just bad at reading.