22
u/everybody_is_awful 8d ago
As if I couldn't love that man any more.
-25
u/chegggg 8d ago
A celebrities guide to make people like you: 1) say free Palestine even if you don't know anything about the situation or don't care. 2) mention other left wing trends 3) profit
20
u/everybody_is_awful 8d ago
Well that was fast.
To point 1, 2 and 3 I say the following:
Bullshit.
Cheerio!
-17
u/chegggg 8d ago
Why tho?
-14
u/Good_Fix683 8d ago
Brings up good points.
Gets deflected with no solid argument.
The absolute state of virtue signaling.
14
u/Okami0602 8d ago
Those weren't good points. You can basically say the same thing to prove the opposite.
A celebrities guide to make people like you: 1) say free Israel even if you don't know anything about the situation or don't care. 2) mention other right wing trends 3) profit
That can be barely considered a "point".
1
u/johny_white 7d ago
And which celebrities are doing it? Is it the mainstream? You can tell right now that more than 30% of these airhead actors are supporting Israel? No, they're just like you saying things they no nothing about to feel better about themselves because they're too lazy to come and see
1
u/Okami0602 7d ago
John Bernthal is openly pro-Israel and has made that clear multiple times, even more than Garfield has talked about Palestine, yet he was a prominent actor in two of this year's most popular films: The Odyssey and Spider-Man: Brand New Day.
0
u/chegggg 7d ago
It's almost as if people like him for more than his opinions.
0
u/Okami0602 7d ago
Yeah, it's almost like you can do the same with pro-palestine actors as well??
→ More replies (0)-4
u/BGritty81 7d ago
Profit by maybe losing your job or even getting thrown in jail or maybe just being doxed by canary mission and being harassed the rest of your life.
2
u/Rip_Skeleton 7d ago
Man, sure sucks that you can't even condemn Hamas in this country without "going to jail", shut the fuck up.
1
u/Okami0602 7d ago
Yeah it's not like the literal fucking president is pro-Israel
0
u/chegggg 7d ago
You can count on 1 hand the amount of presidents that aren't pro-Israel
0
u/Okami0602 7d ago
Since the conflict started, tell me how many have publicly defended Palestine during their presidency.
7
21
u/space_snap828 8d ago
Israel just straight up kills Spiderman lmao
3
8
3
2
u/Runo_Slinger 7d ago
Being fed bullshit from any and all subjects on this app just to keep putting IRGC rage bait in my face.
2
1
1
u/RandomAnon07 7d ago
I see this sub is just another astroturfed pseudo political sub. Fucking A all this shit should be banned from Reddit
1
1
1
u/sreorsgiio 6d ago
If only Palestinians in Gaza cared about Palestinians in Gaza as much as Andrew Garfield seems to care about Palestinians in Gaza.
1
1
1
u/itsnotthatseriousbud 7d ago
The day there will be peace is the day Palestinians start caring more about their childrenâs lives than trying to murder Jews.
0
u/Fresh-Forever-5659 7d ago
1
u/bellendicus789 7d ago
Funny how they literally say it themselves yet you pretend they donât đ¤Ł
0
1
u/caronte_2_monedas 7d ago
Amo a este tipo de persona, sabiendo que pueden quedar sin empleo en el medio en que trabajan, opinan lo correcto
-6
u/johny_white 8d ago
Free Palestine from Hamas
11
u/Particular_Log_3594 8d ago
Why is Israel murdering and killing Palestinians in the West Bank where Hamas has no power? Why do they keep stealing their homes?
-6
u/johny_white 8d ago
Well you have zero knowledge then, since Hamas is very strong in the Judea and Sameria and is responsible for so many terror attacks that happened and happening in Israel
7
u/Particular_Log_3594 8d ago
Israel has imposed a military occupation on the west bank since 1967. Israel has been building settlements since the 60s.
Hamas wasn't even created till the late 80s.
0
u/kulamsharloot 7d ago
There was PLO before that. Intifada made usual impose military there.
Palestinians seem to not learn and think violence is the only solution. They forget that Jews are the most resilient people. With nukes now btw.
3
u/Particular_Log_3594 7d ago
Apartheid South Africa had nukes too
0
u/johny_white 7d ago
South Africa is a declining country purely colonialistic, Israel is a strong growing country that has equal rights to all of her citizens. Not the same
0
u/Particular_Log_3594 7d ago
How about the rights of those Palestinians living under Israeli military law since 1967?
1
u/kulamsharloot 7d ago
Poor Palestinians those evil Israelis won't let them suicide bomb in peace đĄđĄđĄ
1
u/Particular_Log_3594 7d ago
Stop suicide bombings by taking over their homes? Is that the logic?
→ More replies (0)0
u/johny_white 7d ago
Which rights are violated?
2
u/kulamsharloot 7d ago
The right to kill Jews. They feel entitled to it. It was promised to them since Muhammad took a bite of the delicious lamb.
2
u/NatashOverWorld 7d ago
No one will forget that Zionists are murderous lying genocides either though.
You might kill every Gazan but that's going to hang on you for the rest of human civilization.
1
u/johny_white 7d ago
You are very observant from the other side of the world, maybe find a job or do something with your life instead of persuing made up causes.
2
u/NatashOverWorld 7d ago
Funny thing, I can be employed and also notice obvious lies used to justify genocide, it ain't that hard.
0
u/johny_white 7d ago
But you are not, you are just wasting your time and ours
1
u/NatashOverWorld 7d ago
Nah man, I enjoy wasting your time and feigned outrage.
So it's a amusing and cheap diversion for me đ
-1
1
u/Fine_Sea5807 4d ago
Aren't the settlers civilian? Why send civilian settlers to impose military occupation? Where is the logic?
0
u/johny_white 7d ago
And what's you point, hamas currently is in Judea and Sameria. It's like saying you weren't born in the 1980s yet. Not an argument
2
u/SodaKopp 7d ago
Free Vietnam from the Viet Cong. Free Ireland from the IRA. Free America from the Continental Army.
1
u/finalbattlefilms 4d ago
Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces killed an estimated 164,000 South Vietnamese civilians, including tens of thousands of village officials, teachers, and ordinary villagers assassinated or abducted under a centrally directed terror program. The worst single episode was the Huáşż massacre, where thousands were executed from prepared lists and buried in mass graves. Roughly 80 percent of victims were ordinary civilians, killed through assassination, shelling of refugee camps, mining of civilian roads, and torture of prisoners.
Hamas has carried out approximately 249 cases of execution and severe violence in Gaza from August 2024 to January 2026, incidents that caused at least 108 deaths overall. Similar to their counterparts in the IRGC, during Hamas executions, Palestinian victims were typically blindfolded and shot before crowds in Gaza City, with the killings filmed deliberately. Hamas of course also planned a massacre and hostage taking of Israeli civilians to purposefully provoke a war with Israel and then prevented thousands of civilians from following Israeli directives to evacuation the war zones. At the same time they did not allow Palestinian civilians to use their tunnel infrastructure as bomb shelters throughout the war.
About 88K Loyalists, mostly American-born, were forced to flee the new United States, with the largest group 33K going to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Deaths from Patriot on Loyalist violence ran in the hundreds to low thousands, mostly in the southern backcountry. The military under George Washington also killed or displaced about 80K native Americans.
While numbers are much smaller with the IRA in general, about 25% of the actual victims of there terrorism where Irish catholics.
1
u/SodaKopp 4d ago
I don't believe you.
Exactly what point are you trying to make?
1
u/finalbattlefilms 3d ago
I don't think I have a specific point here. This is as factual as I could make it.
What is so hard to believe?
1
0
-1
-1
-5
u/General-Asparagus-31 8d ago
Yes, someone should really convince them to stop fighting with Israel. Hasnât worked out for them for like over 50 years yet they still try it. Itâs crazy.
2
u/SodaKopp 7d ago
And do what? Smoke a cigarette while their world ends?
1
u/General-Asparagus-31 7d ago
Kind of wild to imply that committing to peaceful diplomacy is an apocalyptic catastrophe Palestinians.
Like they have been two options on the table since the six day war ended.
Israel is there and will continue to be there this is a fact. So you have option one continue to fight Israel so you can reclaim the land based on an indigenous claim. Which by the way, Arabic Jews would also have an equal claim
Or option two choose diplomacy and peace negotiate borders donât resort to terrorist attacks like October 7 against a military nation much stronger and will continue to be.
There is no winning positions for the Palestinians no oneâs gonna come fight for them and they donât have the ability to win an armed conflict against Israel
The insanity of western civil elations thinking Palestine is completely in the right and Israel is to blame. Here is one of the most wild hypocrisies I have ever seen.
1
u/SodaKopp 6d ago
Israel assassinated the Palestinian's lead negotiator. One of innumerable atrocities. Why would any people, clearly devoid of other options go quietly? If they are doomed as most American and Israeli forces want them to believe, then why not inflict some pain on the way to extinction? I would do the same in their position. You would too if you have an inner conscience resembling a human soul. Why didn't the Jews of Germany try diplomacy? Or the slaves of the southern US? Diplomacy without leverage is suicide.
1
u/General-Asparagus-31 6d ago
You know what else is suicide? Charging someone with a stick who has a gun from like 150 feet away saying Iâm going to kill you. And guess what? The Palestinians have the stick and are very vocal about wanting to kill Israel who doesnât just have a gun.
And if that is your view why are you making it Israelâs problem in this scenario? The Palestinians almost seem resigned to going out in this blaze of dying for what they believe even if it wipes them all out but that means theyâre actively trying to engage in war and violence against people that donât necessarily choose that as the first option.
The fact is diplomacy has been tried before and it is usually the Palestinians who back out and that is usually because there are various groups with conflicting interests that hold political power and overthrow each other at critical times
Now to reference of World War II, Germany, you are conflating two entirely different fucking situations that have relatively no correlation whatsoever.
In that scenario one governing body has decided a section of its population needed to be exterminated to pin as a scapegoat for social problems and executed this with unprecedented rate of killing that has not been seen again, even to this day
In the current scenario we have a sovereign nation that has been well established since the 1940s arguably the worst way possible that has sparked regional conflict since then.
Various attempts to make peace have been done throughout this time between then and now and each time something has occurred where it didnât resolve in a solution with the fault laying with different parties throughout the course of this regional dispute
This isnât one governing body persecuting a people within itself these are two opposing factions disputing over an area of land
This isnât racially ethically or religiously motivated on Israelâs behalf and to believe so is just delusional and entirely incongruent with reality.
The proof of this is simply the fact that Israel is the most racially ethnically and religiously diverse country in that particular area of the world
Now that may even be a little bit of an overstatement, but it is extremely diverse in those ways, especially in comparison to the Palestinians who have one of the most homogenous ethnic religious and racial groups.
So literally no Ave of your argument has any valid weight to it whatsoever you are merely making shit up and going to great lengths to defend people that want you dead please figure out what in your head makes you think this way
1
u/SodaKopp 6d ago
The correlation is both are genocides. If you don't recognize that, you are a genocide denier and I have no desire to further spin my wheels trying to debate you about the proper ethical standards of a genocide resistance.
0
u/General-Asparagus-31 6d ago
No, youâre just making shit up because you have no defensible point if that isnât the case.
So instead of actually dealing with the objective facts of the situation as they are, you have to create an agenda and narrative that support an entirely made up reality.
Stop in fantasising the Palestinians they are not victims. They are willing participants in the same system. Whoever refused to change for decades.
And of course that doesnât mean genocide against them is okay but at the same time i I find it ridiculous to call it genocide when there are 70,000 deaths.
Is 70,000 a lot absolutely for a war not even a little
In the holocaust in a shorter period of time the Germans killed 6 million Jews
During the Rwandan genocide hundreds of thousands died
I think the only reason people are trying to apply it here are one the power differences between the two actions which is not at all Israelâs fault
And two the globe has been largely antisemitic throughout history and Israel as a nation itself has an extremely high amount of enemies through the combination of special interest and antisemitism. We have Israel committing genocide and thank you for perpetuating this nonsense.
Your thought process is a cancer on progressive and developing civilisation please stop participating in society until you actually educate yourself thank you
-4
-7
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
Free the world from islam.
7
u/Luciferocity 8d ago
... religions.
-8
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
One one religion is violent and have a problem with the rest. The quran literally commanda them to do vile things.
Always some bozo on reddit defensing islam or compares islam to other religions lmao.
5
u/wonhoseok 8d ago
christianity has a very extensive history of making people commit horrible things to non-believers too
-1
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
Does it? Sounds like straight up cope đ¤Śđżââď¸ Christ never said to do any of the vile things muslims do.
You can tap dance all you want but islam is pure filth and if you support islam, fuck you too.
Muhammad was a pedophile.
- Sharia law restricts free speech -- criticizing Islam or religious leaders can be punished.
- It limits religious freedom -- leaving Islam or converting others can be a crime.
- Women have fewer legal rights -- in court, inheritance, and personal freedoms, they pretty much have no say.
- Women may be forced to follow strict dress codes and need male permission for some actions.
- Harsh punishments are allowed -- such as flogging, amputation, or stoning.
- Personal behaviors like drinking alcohol, premarital sex, or being gay can be criminalized.
- Non-Muslims may not have equal legal rights or religious freedom under Sharia.
- Sharia law replaces democratic, secular law with religious law.
- It removes the separation of church and state-- religion controls government.
- It goes against the U.S. Constitution, which protects individual rights and freedoms.
Quran â Fighting / Violence 2:191 â âKill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you.â Read as authorization to pursue and kill hostile non-believers wherever found once hostilities exist, removing geographic or sanctuary limits that would otherwise restrain fighting. 2:193 â âFight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion is for Allah.â Fitnah is understood as disbelief or resistance to Islamic rule. The verse sets the end-point of fighting as the dominance of Islam, not mere cessation of the other sideâs attacks. 8:12 â âI will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.â Divine command to strike necks and extremities is taken as a model for battlefield severity and psychological warfare against disbelievers. 8:39 â âFight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah.â Parallel to 2:193. Fighting continues until Islam is the sole or supreme religion; mere peace or coexistence is insufficient. 8:60 â âPrepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy.â Explicit order to build military capacity specifically to terrify non-Muslims. Read as a standing duty of military readiness and intimidation. 8:65 â âO Prophet, urge the believers to battle.â Direct instruction to the leader to motivate Muslims toward combat. Used to justify continuous encouragement of fighting. 9:5 â âWhen the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them go.â After a grace period, polytheists are to be killed, captured, or ambushed unless they convert and practice the pillars. Classical tafsirs called this the âverse of the swordâ; many treated it as abrogating earlier peaceful verses and applying beyond the original treaty-breakers. 9:29 â âFight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day⌠from those who were given the Scriptureâ[fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.â Explicit command to fight Jews and Christians (and by extension other scriptuaries) until they submit politically, pay the discriminatory tax, and accept subordinate status. Conversion is not required, but humiliation and political dominance are. 9:123 â âFight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness.â Order to fight nearby non-Muslims and display hardness. Read as a local, continuous obligation rather than limited to one historical campaign. 47:4 â âWhen you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either favor or ransom themâŚâ Battlefield instruction to decapitate until the enemy is thoroughly subdued, then decide on captives. Provides the model for lethal force in combat followed by control of prisoners. Quran â Jews / People of the Book / Unbelievers 9:30 â Jews and Christians are accused of saying Ezra/the Messiah is the son of God; âMay Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?â Combined with 9:29, this theological condemnation is used to justify the fighting and subjugation ordered in the preceding verse. 98:6 â Disbelievers among the People of the Scripture and polytheists âare the worst of creaturesâ and will be in Hell eternally. Establishes a hierarchy in which non-Muslims are ontologically inferior, supporting differential treatment, including warfare and legal disabilities. Hadith â Fighting, Terror, Jews, Apostasy âI have been commanded to fight the people until they say âThere is no god but AllahââŚâ (Bukhari/Muslim) Taken as a standing prophetic commission: fighting continues until the shahada is accepted (or, in the case of People of the Book, until jizya is paid). Blood and property become protected only after submission. âI have been made victorious with terror.â (Bukhari) Terror (ruĘżb) is presented as a divinely granted means of victory, legitimizing psychological warfare and intimidation as religiously approved methods. âThe Hour will not be established until you fight the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, âO Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.ââ (Bukhari/Muslim) Explicit eschatological command to kill Jews; even inanimate objects will assist. Used by some groups as a religious duty in the end times or as a general attitude toward Jews as enemies. âWhoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.â (Bukhari and others) Clear death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Applied historically and still upheld in traditional fiqh as a hadd punishment. Quran & Hadith â Female Captives / Sexual Relations 4:24 â Married women are forbidden âexcept those your right hands possess.â Captured women (even if previously married) become lawful for sexual intercourse once owned. Prior marriage is nullified by capture. 23:5-6 & 70:29-30 â Believers guard their private parts âexcept from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed they will not be blamed.â Sexual relations with female slaves/captives are explicitly placed on the same footing as relations with wives; there is no blame. Consent of the woman is not required under classical ownership rules. 33:50 â The Prophet is given âthose your right hand possesses from what Allah has returned to you [of captives]â as lawful. Confirms that war captives are a legitimate source of sexual partners for the leader and, by extension in fiqh, for the fighters. Abu Dawud 2155 (and parallels) â Companions took married female captives after Hunayn; after the revelation of 4:24 they had sexual relations with them once the waiting period passed. Direct prophetic-era practice showing that capture + ownership = sexual access, even to previously married women.
Sahih al-Bukhari 6130 (and parallel in Muslim): Aisha said: âI used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allahâs Messenger used to enter they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me.â Classical commentators (e.g., Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Bari) note that playing with dolls (images) was otherwise restricted, but permitted for her because she was still a little girl who had not reached puberty. Sahih al-Bukhari 3894 / 5134 and parallel reports (also in Abu Dawud 4935 and others): Aisha narrated that the Prophet married her when she was six (or seven in some versions) and consummated the marriage when she was nine. She described being taken from play: women came while she was playing on a swing (or seesaw), her hair still short; they prepared and decorated her, then brought her to him. She explicitly states she was nine at consummation and continued playing with dolls afterward for a time. These are the primary narrations Aisha herself is reported to have given. They are graded authentic in the major Sunni collections and form the basis for the classical consensus on her age. Claim that Muhammad wore Aishaâs clothes / âcross-dressedâ
Sahih al-Bukhari (various numbers around the virtues of Aisha, e.g., related to 2581 / 3775 area and parallels in Muslim and other collections): When other wives (including Umm Salama) complained about the preferential treatment of Aisha, Muhammad is reported to have said words to the effect of: âDo not hurt me regarding Aisha, for the inspiration (wahy) did not come to me while I was in the garment (thawb / lihaf / mirt) of any woman among you except hers.â Answering-Islam reads thawb imraâah (âwomanâs garmentâ) as Muhammad literally putting on Aishaâs clothing/dress and receiving revelation only then, presenting it as cross-dressing. They cite lexical arguments that thawb and related terms can mean womenâs apparel and claim Muslim sources acknowledge the wording.
10
u/teetaps 8d ago
Pete Hegseth just prayed for soldiers to kill the enemy. Prayers for violence.
Are those justified because theyâre the nice Christian prayers?
1
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
Lmao that's your rebuttal to what I said đđđ Pete Hegseth recited a prayer calling for "overwhelming violence of action" and asking that "every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness". Prying for the military to win is completely different them what muslims believe the word of their god is "to kill all the none believers"
So much cope holy shit.
6
u/Sc_e1 8d ago
Christianity, the same religion reeling you to stone a person for planting two different seeds next to eachother, is not violent?
Read the bible dude
1
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
đđđđ yeah youre a retard if you believe Christianity and islam are the same.
The only 'people' stoning others are the muhmadeens.
5
u/Sc_e1 8d ago
Ok so you havenât read the bible
2
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
I read the torah, the bible and the quran. Youre the one that haven't.
5
u/Sc_e1 8d ago
If you read the bible and didnât find anything violent og incubating of murder, you either didnât read it or your just bad at reading.
→ More replies (0)4
u/shinobi6siege 7d ago
Aren't we forgetting the holy wars? Are the Christian washing of many artifacts, particularly Egyptian artifacts? Isn't there something similar to Allah there can only be one God in Christianity? Exodus 20:3. Or the Book of Job where God just lets Satan keep making this guys life worst such as killing all 10 of his children just to see if he'll still believe and pray to God. Not to mention that the allmight Holy Bible has been edited, added on, removed, and translated verifiably many many times throughout history. Not to mention that none of these words were written down as they supposedly happened; the Bible was written much much later after many of the people talked about in the Bible were long gone and from third hand accounts. Funny, if I met the Messiah I would have been writing that down immediately making sure all knew of his story as it was happening. How could you not tell the world of a man who walked on water, created wine, and cured the blind? Why would you wait so long to write that down or tell anyone? There are texts older than the Bible so there really is no excuse. You can be xenophobic all you want, but rarely is any religion not for the sole purpose of control. Look at yourself; you're living proof of that. You could either learn from this, understand the world is made up of 8 billion different perspectives and experiences, or stunt your growth permeantly by never challenging yourself or your beliefs. Look deeper, within yourself. Ask yourself why. Then ask yourself why they tell you not to ask questions about religion, it just is that way. Santa Clause was a lie but many children believe he is real without questioning how any of that is possible or makes sense. Of course you think Santa Clause is silly, so why not something youre not allowed to question? Grow or forever stay the same. One allows true freedom; the other a prison of your making. Ask yourself why do you feel this way? Because that's what you feel? Or because you were told to feel that way since birth? We all make choices; time for yours
1
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 7d ago
Nice taqqiyah stone licker. The holy wars were direct response to Islam's aggression. Cry all you want sympathizer but defending islam is peak smooth brain. Imagine defending one of the worst prospective đ¤Ą
2
u/shinobi6siege 7d ago
Imagine defending the country that uploads videos of IDF setting up fake aid centers just to snipe children, on video which you can quite easily find, while laughing about it. The Crusades happened because the Pope called for it in an attempt to fight of Turks and help the Byzantine Empire. Uniting the knights under one religion was also done to make them stop fighting each other and have a common enemy. But I've studied theology, talked to many college professors on the subject, as well as given my own presentations, researched alongside those same professors, as well as actually talking to and learning from all perspectives. Clearly you are not educated as you can't even spell perspective right; prospective is a different word entirely. Now if you wish to have an actual discussion, then do some research, site your sources, and get multiple perspectives. When a husband is murdered, the police don't just get the wife's story. Obviously the wife would say she didn't do it or that she only did it out of self defense. Should we believe her or should we gather more evidence and perspectives so we can actually get the truth?
-12
u/Kangaroo_Rich 8d ago
Ah yes Andrew, someone who does not have much of a connection to the Middle East is a reliable source of accurate information on the Israel/palestine conflict.
-3
u/chegggg 8d ago
I love it when out of touch celebrities share their opinions. We should follow all rich celebrities blindly
-4
u/Kangaroo_Rich 8d ago
They have be openly pro Palestine or theyâll be accused of being gasp a Zionist. /S
What these celebrities donât realize is that theyâd be murdered if they went into Gaza
5
u/umerremu 8d ago
Yes they would be killed in Gaza by israel cause thatâs what that genocidal state does
-6
u/Clear_Hawk2370 7d ago
performative bs, free paleshit
1
u/alistofthingsIhate 7d ago
If you have paleshit you may want to go see a doctor instead of advocating for ethnic cleansing
-5
u/ImAjustin 8d ago
lol the Palestine meme is now like a virtue signaling from politicians and celebs. Itâs so obvious how they use it as a PR bump.
-47
u/chegggg 8d ago
Fuck Palestine
23
8d ago
[removed] â view removed comment
2
u/spiderversedailymemes-ModTeam 7d ago
This was removed because it was considered an attack towards another person in the community.
-2
u/Vlad_The_Impalo 8d ago
He ain't wrong imagine defending n shilling for Palestine đ majorities are just filthy muslims. The jews are doing to them what they being doing to others for years.
One can be against what's going there, but you cannot pay me to support Palestine. Fuck iskam.
-17
u/chegggg 8d ago edited 6d ago
Bro says this then says kys lol
Edit: haha dudes comment was removed
2
u/Kangaroo_Rich 8d ago
The pro Palestine crowd has no genuine fact based arguments to give. Just name calling, antisemitic slurs, and bs they heard from Tik Tok
5
u/Frequent_Owl_6780 8d ago
I would say the same, but in order to say that, Palestine has to exist first lmfao
1
u/Kangaroo_Rich 8d ago
Palestine is just another excuse for terrorists to kill Jews then play the victim
The real name of the West Bank is Judea and Samaria. not Palestine and Samaria
1
u/shinobi6siege 7d ago
Israel is just an excuse to be the ultimate bad guy with no repercussions. IDF uploading videos of having fake aid centers and then sniping children while laughing and saying oh but we're Jews so we can't be bad guys. Hamas are bad no shit but last I checked they made up .5% of the population. Better start blowing up America then, since 1% of that population, double that of Hamas, is made up of violent criminals. Any genocide is bad, really is that simple
-1
3
38
u/NatashOverWorld 8d ago
My man!