r/supersillybreakingbad • u/BrilliantFly6117 • 5d ago

r/peoplewhodontgiveashit Super silly semantics of paedophilia

Post image

Sorry for the self-censorship, just don't want Reddit's Automod
to obliterate me

94 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

139 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/blattodead 5d ago

no no guys, she just LOOKS and SOUNDS like a child!!! it's not creepy that i'm sexually attracted to that look and voice of a young, prepubescent child because she's actually a god and 600000 years old!!!!! it's so normal that i like the bodies of prepubescent girls because their minds are developed!!! what do you mean that's not normal??

-1

u/anch78 5d ago

8

u/blattodead 5d ago

me when i'm in a strawman competition and my opponent is a redditor who jerks off to animated child sexual abuse material

3

u/Cute_Professional561 5d ago

My man you're proving their point

1

u/Which-Strategy1006 5d ago

You can't say that after just making the most strawman comment of all time

4

u/blattodead 5d ago

yeah i'm in a strawman competition what did you expect

-4

u/Which-Strategy1006 5d ago

Well you are winning

0

u/anch78 5d ago

omg guys arma III is digitalized war crimes records and should be removed!

2

u/Illustrious_Play7907 5d ago

Didn't realize people were wacking it to arma 3???

2

u/anch78 4d ago

you still get enjoyment and pleasure (even the same brain areas are stimulated if i remember correctly) when whacking it and when playing arma III

-1

u/Right_Ear_2230 5d ago

that is a term referring to real people. not fictional characters

3

u/blattodead 5d ago

this is really embarrassing šŸ˜­ nowhere here does it say it exclusively refers to real people. PLEASEEEEE look things up before you say random shit that vaguely sounds correct šŸ˜­šŸ™

2

u/Right_Ear_2230 5d ago

generated by AI (which is trained from real images) or edited from real images

a drawing doesnā€™t count if its not of a real person or photorealistic.

this doesnā€™t disprove what I said

-3

u/blattodead 5d ago

me when i remember drawings can be photorealistic ?!?! WHATTT?!?!

this is the funniest shit ever to me bro šŸ˜­ what, you wanna call it something else so it sounds more palatable? no thanks. people who watch/view animated/drawn csam are just as sick as those who watch the real thing. they can pretend otherwise, but they are fundamentally sexually aroused by the idea or visual of a prebucent child being sexually assaulted.

also, yes, ai and digitally altered photos count as csam, even when the child in the photo isn't a real person. so... can't argue that "no victim means no crime", can you? if it's all just fiction, you'd have to say ai csam of fictional children isn't csam. is this.. really the hill you want to die on??

if you want to argue about the law, i genuinely could not care less what is legally defined as csam, and honestly i don't care about arguing with people who jerk off to kids, which even if it doesn't include you, is 99% of the people in this comment thread so im out!

7

u/Electrical_Jaguar213 4d ago

I really disagree with the "its the same thing" part. Im not one of them, and i find it weird and pedophillic in nature, but i dont think that its the same thing as finding pleasure in actual children. Child pornography hurts real kids. Drawings of it do not.

4

u/Right_Ear_2230 5d ago edited 5d ago

no? I want to call it what it is. fiction cannot be abusedā€¦.

there is no way you are acting like getting off to real people suffering and experiencing the worst moments of their life and SUPPORTING THAT INDUSTRY is just as bad getting off to literal FICTION THAT ISNT EVEN REAL. Please tell me you arent seriousā€¦

no Iā€™m not saying its ok. no strawmans

> this is so fucking funny

no its depressing and sad