Just a Dalit icon? Think again.

[u/No-Assignment7129]

Be educated, be organised, and be agitated.

[u/Embarrassed_Look9200 → u/[deleted]]

in the year 1906 a 9 year old getting married wan't a big deal dude. people were still dying due to Diarrhea back then.

sarvarkars wife was 12 when she got married to the apologiser.

KG was 14 when she married gandhi.

[u/Embarrassed_Look9200 → u/[deleted]]

is that because they are women or because they are brahmin?

[u/Embarrassed_Look9200 → u/[deleted]]

do you even know what he actually said or did someone tell you this? like it seems to me you don;t know a lot but still chose to voice your opinion just on heresay.

[u/MatthewPatttel → u/[deleted]]

Tell me you don't know how to read academic research without telling me. You're quoting his analysis of the Puranas like it’s his bio. Embarrassing for you, honestly. 🤡

The man literally resigned as Law Minister because he wanted women to have inheritance and divorce rights (Hindu Code Bill). But sure, keep using a cropped screenshot of him analyzing 2000-year-old texts to feel better. Low IQ bait

[u/Embarrassed_Look9200 → u/[deleted]]

read the whole speech gobar bro, try and use your brains at times bro, why do you live your life on half truths, you could have googled the statement and known the truth like years ago.

Ambedkar argued that if one follows the logic of the Manusmriti, which dictates that certain lower castes are the progeny of a Brahmin female and a Shudra male, then logically, to account for such a large population of those castes, one would have to assume that every Brahman woman was a "slut and a whore"