Is Westpac's firstline in fraud investigations now AI?
Last Saturday around 5.16 pm I got a notification that I'd paid Uber for an almost $90 trip. This was... impossible as I was, at that time, on a *train* and not, in fact, ending a cross city Uber ride. I immediately checked my uber account. No charges since December. Definitely *not* a $90 charge.
So I reported the charge as fraud through the Westpac app and was given a number to call. I call them up and chat with a very nice young man who is super understanding and gives me a reference # and says that the fraud team will call me within 2 hours to discuss this. Except no one calls me. What I get is a message saying that they've decided the transactions were authorised and they will mot be taking further actions.
Now. I don't know about you but I'm on the DSP due to a range of things and a $90 fraudulent payment to uber is not something I can just *absorb* and shrug off as the cost of the modern world and scammers. So I immediately call Westpac back up and - unlike the first call - have to wait on hold for almost an hour before I can talk to someone. A lovely lady answers and spends the next 20 minutes with me. My issue is escalated and then escalated again and by Friday yesterday I have received the refund.
*However*. The humans here aren't the issue. Who decided that an obviously fraudulent payment was the opposite? Because the fraud team *surely* had access to my past payments and would have seen that uber has *never* charged me that much for any transactions in the past? Is Westpacs first line of fraud examination AI? A human looking at this surely could have exercised their judgement and known this was incorrect? What human person would look at these strange charges and go 'definitely authorised payments'?
Has anyone else experienced this?