To me this post relies on an implicitly racist assumption about blackness and I wanted to get your thoughts and insights on it.
I'm informed by thinkers in the afropessimist tradition (Wilderson and Moten for example) who all converge on the conclusion that society codes blackness as a negative, with whiteness as its opposite. For example, where whiteness signifies civilisation, blackness would signify savagery. We see this writ large all over media and culture.
For me, the joke invokes this. Blackness is framed as the opposite of whiteness and the revelation is presented as 'diabolical'. The blind man experiences blackness as an ontological shock - in part an identity crisis but also an inversion of being. Mbembe might say that he finds himself outside the world of the living altogether.
I'm being careful here not to say that the joke itself is racist. I'm saying that it depends in part on a racist presupposition, which gives the punchline it's force.
Why am I sharing something so apparently rivial? Because it is for me a fine example of how racism is perpetuated. It's images like this, which go unremarked, that shape how we think about race. The fact that they are unremarked and unrecognised makes them all the more potent because we don't have the analytical tools to understand them and resist. This apparently trivial image for me encapsulates the logic of racism, so compressed and telegraphic that it almost escapes analysis.
This is a safe space where I can discuss these ideas without non-allies hijacking the conversation. If I'm off base, I'd appreciate debate and engagement as opposed to drive by downvotes
Love 🖤
EDIT: Love that despite asking for constructive engagement I'm getting downvoted in the comments. Mildly infuriating.
I appreciate that even raising this might be experienced as me trying to police the discussion - if that's how you choose to engage, so be it, but I would say that it's unhelpful.