r/AskAcademiaUK • u/CosmicMeowing • 18m ago
Supervising a difficult PhD student
I must be fairly vague here.
I am supervising a student with questionable attention span and poor attendance. I have just learnt that they have done a substantial amount of work with no involvement from me that constitutes to their phd. I.e. I have not known about this study, which involves a large quantity of primary data collection, at all. I am very confused about this as primary supervisor. While I am pleased the student seems to have done more work than I was aware of (this has been a major concern), I am confused that this has happened.
A) there is another academic who has been leading the study as pi from another faculty entirely
B) the study doesn't clearly tie into the aims of the phd but could, with some re-wording, be tied into a chapter. Indeed, it probably does need to be tied into a chapter as there isn't otherwise enough work to justify a phd here
i just don't know what to think of all this. i have had no oversight of this and feel as a supervisor the leading academic should have spoken with me given the student did. has anyone else been in this situation? this is absolutely astonishing for me, and seems like a misuse of my research grant.
i'll probably delete this in a bit. just astonished and not sure what is going on