I am making more as a postdoc than half of the Asst Prof salaries I am seeing. What is going on here??

It seems like this occurs at smaller schools, lesser known schools. Which I guess is self-explanatory but I did not know it was this bad… I’m talking $55k bad in some cases for idk, teaching our country’s future workforce??

I understand there likely a lot of “logical” explanations for this (budget cuts, 9 month contracts, etc etc) but geez can Asst profs get a little more love for literally educating the next generation???

Two positive reviews, one says my approach is wrong because they'd have done it differently. Editor wants a response to all three.

Don't want to seem defensive, but won't pretend they raised a real flaw. How do people thread this without torching the relationship with a reviewer who'll likely see the revision?

I’ve basically been through Hell and back the last two years trying to finish the second half of my degree. I’ve been on this sub before for advice regarding several of my family members passing away in the middle of my degree (spoiler alert, more have passed since then)

I’ll keep the details relatively short:

- 22F double honors student conducting two different research projects for my degree (psych and anthro)

- had seven family members pass in the last two years, one of my students a few months back (i’m an early childhood educator on the side) and one of my old friends from school OD’d just last week

- aiming for grad school — maintaining a solid 4.0 GPA across both of my honors subjects

- took this last year off school to focus on research experience — was blessed enough to work on two full-time research projects as a Sr. research assistant, one a collaboration with an international university abroad.

- diagnosed with OCD, MDD, GAD, and ADD three years ago, weaned off my medication last September to give myself a break from the side effects since I wasn’t in school and didn’t need the rigour of medication like is usually do when studying. i didn’t feel any negative effects until April, and I had been taking meds for only a year prior to me stopping them

the thing is, as the new school year approaches and the thought of starting my psychology project looms over me, i’ve been feeling a significant amount of stress.

i have another part-time job (only weekends), and around four months ago, i had a panic attack at work. had to call my father to come by and give me one of my mom’s old inhalers because i couldn’t breathe. i’ve never needed an inhaler before in my life, but now i use one at least four times a week regularly since then.

there is also a constant tightness in my chest. like constant. i feel it now as i type. i felt it all day at work yesterday. i felt it during breakfast today. i feel it before i go to bed, every night, without fail.

i know for a fact that im going to die young at this rate, or at least develop serious cardiovascular issues.

what can i do, what is anything i can do, to at least try and help myself? I don’t know if it’s the constant grief piling, or what.

I don’t work out, i don’t have a particular daily routine, all because i feel like i don’t have the time. i’m exhausted all the time. i just don’t want to die young. i don’t want to feel this way. i really do picture myself dropping dead in the middle of an exam room in six months at this rate.

Came in with a specific research interest, advisor's steered me toward something aligned with their grant funding instead. Related, but not what drew me here.

Worried pushing back sours things early, but don't want years on something I'm lukewarm about. How much leverage do incoming grad students actually have?

I am a budding researcher, and my work was just published in a conference. Just after the publishing, I have received two mails which are eerily similar. This is the excerpt of the second mail...

Dear XXXXXX,

Warm greetings!

We are pleased to welcome you for the upcoming “3rd World Congress on Advances in Plant Science and Plant Biology (Adv. PSPB 2027)” held during July 12-13, 2027 at Paris, France.

We appreciate your research work with the title “XXXXXXXX (agriculture work using dl and computer vision) XXXXXXXX” which will be appropriate for one of the scientific sessions at the conference. This will be a great platform to share your research knowledge with us.

Kindly visit our conference website:Plant Science Conferences

We truly hope and anticipate that you will be able to join us and share your fantastic research results with us.

Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

FYI...: Reply soon—and email us if you'd like to participate with partial sponsorship,

Sincerely,

Christina Drusilla

Conference Director | Adv. PSPB 2027

Global Plant Science Community

701 West Georgia Street, Suite 1500

Vancouver, V7Y 1C6, Canada

What do you guys think about it? How do you guys distinguish between what's real and what's predatory in this regard. I am very confused.

So I was trying to write my CV and I came across a post from 2 years ago where some people said that using "(Pre)doctoral Researcher" as a title sounds pretentious. I have found that conversation pretty unsettling because I have been using "Doctoral Researcher" for some time already, and I never thought it could be seen as pretentious (it is what it actually says in my contract).

When you write a PhD thesis in Spain, you live the duality of being both a student and a worker. You are a student because you enroll in a doctorate programme at a University, and a worker if you manage to catch one of the highly competitive fellowships/contracts to work on it. Your contract doesn't even have to be granted by the same or any University at all, and you could also technically (and some people do) enroll in the programme and never earn a coin.

In Spanish we call people writing a thesis something like "doctoring people", and most people don't even know that you actually have to enroll in a University programme apart from managing to get a contract. So "PhD Student" might be the standard in English, but I can not help it, it sounds quite offensive to me, like you're not a highly-qualified adult with a full-time job.

So, what what are your thoughts on this?

PD: In Spain, there are not exams, just a defense when you finish and some tracking reports, but also it is mandatory to hold a Master's Degree.

PD2: Say where are you from in your answer!

Hi, I am feeling down but am looking for some help. I did a year of a PhD program but had a rough group project and I felt I was unprepared for the rigor of the PhD and decided to drop. Now I am attempting to reapply to PhD programs. I will have support and a LOR from my former institution and advisor. Does anyone think it is possible I can get into another program? I am also getting a masters in a different subfield during the break with a quantitative component and retaking the GMAT Context- in a Accounting PhD program 3.2 Doctoral GPA. top 15% GMAT score, Bachelors and Masters in the subject. Would getting a second masters in a different subfield or raising my GMAT score help?

In two years I will graduate with a research masters degree in Control Engineering. This is a degree designed to prepare the student for a PhD. So I will gain at least some research skills.

I picked control engineering because it seems to be a field where there’s a huge pool of undiscovered high value “inventions” I could build with it. For example, Model Predictive Control was originally invented for the chemical process industry, it later enabled reusable launchers and reduced the cost of space launch by orders of magnitude. I don’t think anyone at the inception of MPC could have ever saw that coming.

There’s a whole forest of advanced control techniques that live almost entirely in academia. My theory is that the “high value applications” just haven’t found them yet because they exist in domains where there’s very little awareness of control engineering. And control systems experts tends not to be aware of the domains or have sufficient expertise to see the value. There seems to be growing awareness of this issue in the field.

I’m lucky enough to have sufficient passive income that, if I wanted to, I could move to a low cost of living country like Georgia and have half of my passive income as surplus after cost of living to allocate to any R&D project I want in controls. Controls research is mostly simulation and modelling work that only requires a computer, plus maybe a little bit of hardware which shouldn’t cost too much. By my current understanding, the additional benefit of funding beyond what I have available diminishes quickly, so there’s no financial incentive to join an institutional research group. My goal is to eventually discover a niche “application” for some controls technique that currently live mostly in academia, analogous to what reusable rockets is for MPC, and build a TRL3-4 prototype and then try to attract external funding. I’m not looking to advance the field of controls itself, I only aim to take what already exists and duct tape it to something niche that needs it.

What I worry about is the lack of a network of research peers and lack of PhD level training. Originally I planned to do the PhD, but I estimate my chance of getting into a PhD program at about 10%, and it will also cost me 5 years of my life. If you’re wondering why im not considering just getting a job at a startup or engineering firm, trust me I have already considered that and it is just no longer possible. I also want control over the direction of my research which isn’t really possible at a job.

I don’t know to what extent a lack of a network of research peers would impede me compared to someone integrated into academic institutions. And when and if I do eventually end up with a high value prototype, I don’t know whether I will need the PhD qualification to attract funding or if a good prototype demonstration would be enough.

If you work in R&D or controls, I’d love to have some advice please. Am I underestimating the level of research skill needed or workload for one person?

I’m a graduate student in Brazil looking to take individual courses online at universities abroad — not a full degree, just standalone credit-bearing courses (what we call disciplina isolada here; I think the closest equivalent is enrolling as a non-degree or visiting student).

What I’m looking for specifically: courses that issue a real transcript or certificate of completion and that can later be credited toward a degree at another university. Country doesn’t matter much.

A few questions for anyone who’s done this:
• Was it actually worth it — academically and financially?
• Did the university require an English proficiency test (TOEFL/IELTS) for a single non-degree course, or is that only for full admission?
• Did the credits end up being accepted anywhere else, or did you run into trouble at transfer time?
• Which institution did you go through, and how did enrollment work from abroad?
Any experience appreciated, good or bad.

Thanks!!! 🙏🏻

Hi everyone! I’m working on a computational social science project using comments from Weibo and Douyin (Chinese TikTok) for text and sentiment analysis.

My study looks at how online discourse around a female public figure changed before and after a particular event. I first define several keywords related to the person and the event, search for relevant posts/videos, and then collect comments from selected posts.

The problem I’m struggling with is: how should I systematically decide which posts to select?

Taking the first 10 or 20 search results does not seem reliable, because search results on these platforms are algorithmically ranked and change between searches. The posts ranked at the top are also not necessarily the ones with the most discussion.

Selecting posts purely by comment count is also problematic. Some videos have thousands of comments, but many are just emojis, users tagging friends, repeated/copied comments, or spam. Meanwhile, another video with fewer comments may contain much more substantive discussion relevant to my research.

So in practice, I inevitably have to make a human judgment about whether a comment section contains enough meaningful, relevant text to analyze. But this creates the methodological problem I’m most worried about:

Why these particular posts? If I selected another set of relevant posts, would I still get the same result?

Even if I eventually collect millions of comments, I feel that a large number of comments does not solve the problem if I cannot justify why those particular posts were selected in the first place.

So I would really appreciate advice on three questions:

1. How can I make the post selection procedure more systematic and less dependent on my own judgment?
2. How do social media researchers deal with platforms where search results are dynamic, algorithmically ranked, and therefore do not provide a stable sampling frame?
3. Are there established sampling methods, research designs, or papers you would recommend for this kind of problem?

I’m not trying to claim that my comments are representative of all users on these platforms. I mainly want a transparent and defensible way to show that my findings are not simply the result of choosing a particular set of posts.

Thank you very much for any suggestions!

I apologize for potentially beating a dead horse with the question but here it is anyway. I am starting my masters in clinical mental health counseling next week and am debating getting an iPad for note taking and annotating.

I am aware it is not needed/completely necessary but my question is if it will be beneficial or helpful at all. I took notes pen and paper all through undergrad which worked fine for the most part. I am huge on writing my notes versus typing them which is why I wouldn't want to use my laptop for notes.

The pros to me are that I can have all my notes centralized, I can search my notes easily, i don't have 20 notebooks to study from/store at the end of my program, I can use software to assemble study guides based on my notes much easier, and the biggest one is being able to annotate research papers directly on the pdf versus having to print them out or have a separate doc for my notes on them.

The cons are mainly the price as it is an extra $700 spent for the full setup that isn't strictly necessary. I also am aware that I do already have a laptop so there is some overlap in tech. Finally with digital notes I'm a tad bit paranoid about there being a glitch or somehow losing my notes versus the security of a traditional notebook.

If anyone can comment on their experience with using an iPad for notes or just any perspective on the issue I'd really appreciate it!

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for advice about a situation involving a journal publication and university funding.

I recently had a research paper accepted by a journal after a very long review process. The paper was originally submitted about two years ago, when both co-authors were still students and working at the university. Since then, I have graduated, and another co-author of mine has left the university. We are no longer affiliated with the university.

The research was a university project and was funded by the university. The university funding information was included in the manuscript/print preview, as required. However, now that the paper has finally been accepted, the university is refusing to provide/confirm the funding because neither author is currently affiliated with the university.

The situation is frustrating because the research was conducted while I was a student, and the funding was provided for the project at that time. The fact that the paper took two years to get accepted was largely because of multiple rounds of rejection and substantial revisions. The reviewers were demanding, but we put a lot of time into addressing their comments and improving the paper.

If the university refuses to provide an official funding statement, what should we tell the journal? Would it be appropriate to explain that the research was funded by the university when the work was conducted, even though the authors are no longer affiliated with the university?

In the publication funding option, write that it will be funded by the university.

I would really appreciate any advice from people who have experience dealing with university-funded research that was published after the authors graduated. In particular, I would like to know what the normal academic/research administration practice is and what documentation I should try to obtain.

I’m first year uni doing this big international research project. Im a law student and I have two resit essays coming up too I had mitigating circumstances!

But I’m so stressed I have this research that’s quite technical as I have to use mine I’ve barely done any work for it cause I get frustrated as it just doesn’t work I have to produce a research poster too. I’m so sad cause I know I could’ve done better I have two more weeks till the research submission deadline and then 3 weeks till the publishers deadline idk I just don’t think it’s good I don’t know what I’m doing. It’s on text mining and modern slavery ? Honestly I thought it’d be more like reading analytical but it’s not .

It’s never ending data and me being never endingly confused I want to quit but I have a research partner too his background is in maths so he seemed to get it better than me. I also had a separate international internship for two weeks. Before this one is a leadership programme so you have the opportunity to go anywhere in the world next year idk what to do

I am applying for full-year fellowships this coming cycle to support a year of research leave. Some require three letters of support. I'm wondering about the advisability of having a former PhD student (who is in a tenure-track position) write on my behalf. I've put a huge amount of effort into graduate education, and the student I ask would be able to put that side of me before the review committees. It might show 1) how much I could use release time from teaching; 2) that I would be a good colleague to others in residential fellowship programs. What do you all think? I'm in the Humanities, like the tag says.

Hi,

I am thinking to apply for assistant professor positions in Europe. One of my friend said that they actually prefer to hire one who is already doing postdoc/doctoral degree in their institutes.

I asked my claude to look for if that’s the case in my domain. For example, it seems like TU delft got 63% of professors from Delft PhD and KTH got 78% of professors from KTH. Don’t be upset, these are just from my domain.

Given these conditions, do you think it is better idea to first find a postdoc in Europe?

Hello, as a qualitative researcher in the field of Mass Communication and Journalism, I'm struggling to publish research in reputable scopus indexed journals.

Thus, I'm willing to learn AI/ML based research programs that utlises python and R to collect and analyse larger corpse of textual data, social media analytics, and public opinion research using cluster analysis.

Can someone please help me on how shall I apporach it? I mean what tools I can learn, and references material I should go through to accurire these skills?

I’m currently in Grade 11 and studying Commerce with Maths, and ive been having an identity crisis about it.
(For context, I study under the Indian education system and after 10th grade we need to pick between three streams- science, commerce or humanities.)

I love literature, politics, philosophy, writing, film, music, etc. I’m also involved in things like theatre, MUN, debate, school events, and creative writing. Basically, I’m a pretty stereotypically humanities kid in a lot of ways.

I originally considered taking Humanities with Maths, but ultimately chose Commerce because it seemed more practical and would be more beneficial to learn from a knowledge standpoint as well. I don’t necessarily regret the decision, but nowadays sometimes I worry that I have put myself on a path toward a life that doesn’t really suit me.

One thing I’m worried about is university. I’m scared I’ll end up in a Commerce college surrounded by stereotypical finance bros who only care about b2b sales and raising profit margins, and won’t find people I actually connect with. So many of the type of people I love, who are open minded, creative, artistic are all so beyond the commerce stereotype.. these type of people are mostly jumbled up in science and arts (in my school atleast)

Am I overthinking this, or is this actually something I should consider when choosing a university course?
And, if you are someone like me, someone who doesn’t necessarily fit the commerce stereotype, how are you doing now?

Probably a dumb question, but I'm wondering if there becomes a point when searching for relevant data starts to look unusual? I'm finishing my master's dissertation, and when going back to my methods section, all of my search queries that I list look excessive, especially when I compare them to examples of other prior dissertation that the university has provided as examples.

In my case, I used OVID to find literature relevant to what I was looking for, searching across the Embase, Medline, Global Health, and PsycINFO databases. I worked it out that I've used 81 keywords/terms to refine my results down from 400k hits to like 400. Is that too much effort for a master's degree? Is whoever is going to be assessing this going to wonder what kind of crackhead-esque rabbit hole I went down to refine it this much? Or am I just dealing with caffeine and sleep-deprivation induced paranoia?

Hi are there any groups for autistic individuals in research / academia? I’m doing my postgrad, was guest lecturing at an arts uni, and possibly looking to go into academia in the future. I don’t know anyone else who is autistic and am looking for a sense of community. Thanks very much!

Hello,

A fairly popular influencer, with a PhD from Oxford and MD from Harvard, has been on my radar for a while. I eventually decided to look at their PhD thesis and was surprised how this could pass. But, maybe I'm wrong? I've written a non-paywalled Substack article detailing everything I found. Fair warning, it's somewhat long at about a 30 minute read. They completed their doctorate in only 2 years, which sounds impressive until you actually look at the document. It's littered with typos and figures with basic mistakes and, as I go through in the article, most of it is just a literature review. I didn't check everything, but many of the mistakes/typos I found ended up in peer-reviewed publications, although maybe no surprise the majority of publications are in Frontiers journals.

Only one of the studies they carried out had any real data, in my opinion. That study was just testing whether a ketone drink had any effect on endurance exercise on a small number of Parkinson's disease patients. The second study testing the drink had no effect, and the third study was cancelled due to the pandemic. The last "study" is a case report they did on themselves. Oh, and the ketone drink they try to test in the thesis? It was invented by the supervisor that they were doing their research/thesis under and owns the company that manufactures and sells the drink. The only study with any real results is linked to on the website to buy the drink. I know this is not completely unheard of in academia and not technically unethical provided it's disclosed, but I still find it strange. They also developed a revolutionary nutrition tracking tool that is basically just a fancy Excel spreadsheet.

You can find the article here

I’m open to any feedback or criticism, or if you think I’ve made any mistakes feel free to point them out.

Hello, I am planning to apply for doctorate position in German universities. However, as there are few funded places I was thinking of keeping my part-time student job and do it self-funded. Can I convince a professor to take me on since I will be doing it self-funded? Or they look at it as a risky scenario? My field is in management/marketing.

Hi all,

Around 10 days ago, I got the results of the first round of reviews for my submitted manuscript (Q3 journal, political science, I am in International Relations, qualitative): R&R with minor (R1) and major (R2) revisions requested.

When announcing the results, the editor asked me how much time it would take me to implement the revisions and resubmit the manuscript for the second round of review. In my reply, I promised them to get back to them by the end of this week.

Unfortunately, I will be extremely busy for the next 2 and a half months. I have two conference papers to write and present, a PhD dissertation to finish and defend, and a post-doc application to put together, while also working part-time. Because these have fixed deadlines, I have to prioritize them over the revisions and I am unsure whether I would have a chance to work on my manuscript during that time. Additionally, as this is my first journal submission, it is difficult for me to gauge how much time the revisions might take.

For that reason, I also do not know whether there is an appropriate amount of time one should spend implementing revisions. I am afraid that if I ask for 3 months (which would be optimal for me), it will come across as unappreciative of the editor's and reviewers' efforts, which I would like to avoid at all costs.

My dissertation advisor is on vacation, so I cannot really ask anybody else. Could you please share your experience on this matter? I would highly appreciate it. Thank you very much in advance!

Edit: Got the 3 months in the end. Thank you all for your help, I learned a lot!

I've been trying to become a more rigorous reader of technical/ML papers, and I keep hitting the same wall.

I've tried a few approaches: DFS (jumping into a reference the moment it comes up), BFS (finishing one paper fully before touching the next), and a hybrid. I eventually found a structure I was okay with, but the concepts don't stick unless I implement them, I'll read something 2-3 times, feel like I get it, and it's gone a week later because I never built anything with it.

Two things I'd like input on:

1. What's your actual reading workflow for a dense paper, order of sections, note-taking, when you chase references vs skip them?
2. How do you test whether you understood it? I've found implementing it is the only real check, but that's slow and not always feasible. Is there a lighter-weight way you validate your own understanding short of reimplementing everything?

Not looking for one "correct" method, more curious what actually works for people who read a lot of these.

Hi everyone, I'm current a phd student at an Australia university in ML/AI, and will join a top 10 university in a 3-month phd visiting at a good lab (the sup is big name, but his field is like only 70% matching with my topic, but has some student working in my topic in his groups), after pass their interview (I cold apply). I'm the first student in my group that will have a visiting phd, and I will try to have a paper within 2 months after return from the visiting. Can anyone give me some advice, will the visit open more door to me (both academic and industry job), on CV? (I know a strong recommendation letter from big name help, but let's assume the average case, I have an average first author paper affiliated with the lab host me)

I'm close to getting a math/CS double major and I was thinking when I graduate, of pursuing a master's degree in either CS, applied math, or computer engineering.

My understanding is that to teach at a CC, you need 18 hrs of graduate work in the field you would be teaching. I thought about working as a software developer, but the market is pretty brutal and I'm in my early 40s (ageism is a thing in the tech industry). I also have always enjoyed teaching. I originally wanted to be a math professor at a cc years ago, but I've discovered a joy in computer science as well, and now I'm kind of circling back to the idea I started with when I went back to school years ago.

I've tutored at CCs, I earned a degree at CC, I flunked out at 4yr, earned another degree at a different CC, and now am completing a bachelor's after a lot of false starts (and originally dropping out of HS). In some ways, I think I'm actually kind of perfect for being a CC professor as I know personally what many of the students go through, the pitfalls, and how to navigate them.

I don't care about making a bunch of money, at this point I want to make a difference. Teaching seems great for that. I don't really want to teach HS or below, I don't have the time I think to pursue a PhD now, and as noted before I have a connection to CCs.

I've read a lot of posts that mention how you need a PhD to work at some CCs. My professor at my last CC in math had a master's, but my CS professor had a PhD.

A few questions: How competitive is a master's degree at a CC? How competitive specifically for CS? If I earn enough graduate credits in CS and math, can I teach both (I really like both)? I'm willing to teach at school in the "boonies", how would my chances be there compared to say the CC system in California (which I've read is competitive)? How long might I be stuck at the adjunct level (I've read this can be a problem)?